Conflicting Neuropathological and Computertomographic Findings in Cases of Suspected Brain Tumors or Retrobulbar Tumors

  • H.-U. Thal
  • A. Wanis
  • U. Pasch
  • M. Weizsäcker
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Neurosurgery book series (NEURO, volume 10)


CUSHING’s monography includes 2000 histologically verified intracranial tumors, 1031 cases of suspected and 859 histologically unverified tumors during a period of 30 years. We report 12 cases among 520 space-occupying lesions seen during the last two years in whom the diagnosis of a tumor could not be proven histologically. 4 patients are already excluded where the clinical course or the second operation finally proved the diagnosis of a tumor. It seems that this number remains too high with respect to the improved diagnostic methods including CT scanning.


Brain Abscess Cranial Computerize Tomography Neuropathological Finding Neuroradiological Finding Lipomatous Tissue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bailey, P.: Contribution to the histopathology of “pseudotumor cerebri”. Arch. Neurol, and Psych. 4, 401–416 (1920)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bradac, G.B., Simon, A.S., Grumme, T., Schramm, J.: Limitations of computed tomography for diagnostic neuroradiology. Neuroradiology 13, 5, 243–247 (1977)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cushing, H.: Intrakranielle Tumoren. Berlin: Springer 1935Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, K.R., Taveras, J.M., Roberson, G.M., Ackerman, R.H.: Some limitations of computed tomography in the diagnosis of neurological diseases. Am. J. Roentgenol. 127, 111–123 (1976)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kazner, E., Wende, S., Meese, W.: Reliability and limitations of cranial computerized tomography. In: Cranial Computerized Tomography. Lanksch, W., Kazner, E. (eds.), pp. 463–470. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1976Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mori, H., Lu, Ch., Chiu, L.C., Cancilla, P.A., Christie, J.H.: Reliability of computed tomography: Correlation with Neuropathology Findings. Am. J. Roentgenol. 128, 795–798 (1977)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nonne, M.: Über Fälle vom Symptomenkomplex “Tumor cerebri” mit Ausgang in Heilung (Pseudotumor cerebri). Dt. Ztschr. f. Nervenheilk. 27, 169–216 (1904)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tentler, R.L., Palacios, E.: False-negative computerized tomography in brain tumor. Jama 238, 339–340 (1977)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wende, S., Aulich, A., Lange, S., Lanksch, W., Schmitt, E.J.: Computerized tomography in diseases of the orbital region. In: Cranial Computerized Tomography. Lanksch, W., Kazner, E. (eds.), pp. 207–211. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1976Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wende, S., Aulich, A., Kretschmar, K., Grumme, Th., Meese, W., Lange, S., Steinhoff, H., Lanksch, W., Kazner, E.: Die Computer-Tomographie der Hirngeschwülste. Eine Sammelstudie über 1658 Tumoren. Radiologe 17, 149–156 (1977)PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • H.-U. Thal
  • A. Wanis
  • U. Pasch
  • M. Weizsäcker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations