CT Localization and Operative Approaches in Posterior Fossa Lesions

  • J. Gilsbach
  • H. R. Eggert
  • Ch. Ostertag
  • W. Seeger
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Neurosurgery book series (NEURO, volume 10)

Abstract

With the help of the computed tomography more than 90% of the tumors and av-malformations of the posterior fossa can be positively shown. With the first generation computers only the geometrical position of the tumor could be determined in relation to the bony structures. With the most modern scanners which have a thin section and reconstruction possibilities, the relationship to each cerebellar lobe and brain stem structures can be recognized.

Keywords

Neurol Meningitis Hydrocephalus Dura 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adson, A.W.: A straight lateral incision for unilateral sub-occipital cranitomy. Surg. Gynec. Obst. 72, 99–100 (1941)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Böhm, B., Mohadjer, M., Hemmer, R.: Preoperative continous measurements of ventricular pressure in hydrocephalus occlusus with tumors of the posterior fossa: the value of ventricular shunt. In: Advances in neurosurgery, Vol. 5. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1978Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dandy, W.E.: Results of removal of acoustic tumors by the uni-lateral approach. A.M.A. Arch. Surg. 42, 1026–1033 (1941)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foerster, O.: Das operative Vorgehen bei Tumoren der Vierhügel-gegend. Wien. Klin. Wschr. 41, 986–990 (1928)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frazier, C.H.: The midline bloodless approach to the posterior fossa. Tr. Ann. S.A. 44, 229–247 (1926)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krause, F.: Operative Freilegung der Vierhügel nebst Beobachtungen über Hirndruck und Dekompression. Zentralbl. J. Clin. 53, 2812–2819 (1926)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Martle, T.: La thérapeutique des tumeurs cerebrales. Tech-nique chirurgicale. Rapp. Congr. Soc. Internat. Chir. 1 803–846 (1926)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naffziger, H.C.: Brain surgery with special reference to exposure of the brain stem and posterior fossa, the principle of intra-cranial decompression and the relief of impactions in the posterior fossa. Surg. Gynec. Obst. 46, 240–248 (1928)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rand, R.W., Kurze, T.: Facial nerve preservation by posterior fossa transmeatal microdissection in total removal of acoustic tumors. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. psychiat. 28, 311–316 (1965)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Torkildsen, A.: A new palliative operation in case of inoperable occlusion of the Sylvian aquaeduct. Acta Chir. Scand. 82, 117–124 (1939)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Unsold, R., Ostertag, Ch., de Groot, J., Newton, T.H.: Computed tomography and computer refoemation of the brain and skull base. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yasargil, M.G., Smith, R.D., Gasser, J.C.: Microsurgical approach to acoustic neurinomas. In: Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery. Krayenbühl, H. T ed.). Vol. 4. Wien, New York: Springer 1977Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zapetal, B.: Ein neuer operativer Zugang zum Gebiet der Incisura tentorii. Zbl. Neurochir. 16, 64–69 (1956)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Gilsbach
  • H. R. Eggert
  • Ch. Ostertag
  • W. Seeger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations