Substitution of a Percutaneous Vascular Access for Repeated Hemodialysis in Children
If standard arteriovenous vascular access is not available, alternatives must be created when hemodialysis is indicated. Most often the need is transient as in acute renal failure, or in chronic renal failure when a more permanent access has not yet matured. However, in an occasional patient all potential sites for permanent vascular access have become irreversibly occluded. In both acute and chronic failure, it may be of utmost importance to the child’s subsequent management to preserve as many peripheral vessel sites as possible for future fistula or shunt creation. A flexible catheter, percutaneously placed into an alternative vascular site, with sufficient caliber for adequate blood flow, and of variable length to accomodate to the child’s size would be of considerable value in these situations. Such a catheter has been developed for pediatrics in our unit with experience over a 22 month period in 21 children.
KeywordsCatheter Urea Heparin Assured Peri
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Kipp KF, Gutch CF, Kolff WJ (1972) Single needle dialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 18: 75Google Scholar
- 3.Gotch FA (1976) Hemodialysis: technical and kinetic considerations. In: Brenner BM, Rector FC (eds) The kidney. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 1681Google Scholar
- 4.Erben J, Kvasnicka J, Bastecky J, Vortel V (1969) Experience with routine use of subclavian vein cannulation in hemodialysis. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 6: 59Google Scholar
- 7.Butt KMH, Kountz SL, Friedman EA (1976) Angioaccess. In: Ravitch M (ed) Current problems in surgery, vol. XIII No. 9. Year Book Publications, Chicago, pp 7–9Google Scholar
- 8.Schwartzbeck A, Brittinger WD, Strauch M (1978) Percutaneous cannulation of subclavian vein for acute hemodialysis. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 15: 575Google Scholar
- 9.Uldall PR, Dyck RF, Woods F, et al. (1979) A subclavian catheter for temporary vascular access for hemodialysis or plasmapheresis. Dialysis and Transplantation (N. Hollywood, California ) 8: 963Google Scholar