Advertisement

The Use of Diffusion Chambers in the Study of Tumour Immunobiology and Lymphokines

  • S. Buessow
  • D. M. Lopez
  • A. M. Miller
Conference paper

Abstract

Diffusion chambers were employed to study the in vivo mechanism of cytotoxicity reactions in a mammary tumor mouse model system. Chambers containing normal or tumor-immune murine spleen cells were implanted into both normal and tumor-bearing recipient mice. Spleen cells from recipient animals were subsequently assayed in three different types of cytotoxic reactions: phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-induced cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and specifically induced, nonspecifically expressed cytotoxicity (SINEC). Lymphocyte responses of either group of recipients receiving chambers containing normal spleen cells were unaffected. Additionally, tumor-bearing recipients implanted with chambers containing tumor-immune spleen cells showed no significant changes in these cell-mediated immune assays. In sharp contrast, normal mice receiving chambers with tumor-immune spleen cells became responsive in the SINEC assay while not changing their reactivity in the other two cytotoxic assays. Since in vitro evidence exists that lymphokines are at least in part responsible for the mechanism of SINEC, we propose that the use of diffusion chambers demonstrates the in vivo relevance of these factors.

Keywords

Spleen Cell Mouse Bone Marrow Diffusion Chamber Spleen Lymphocyte 51Cr Release 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Algire, G.H., Weaver, J.M., Prehn, R.T.: Growth of cells in vivo in diffusion chambers. I. Survival of homografts in immunized mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 15, 493–508 (1954)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berman, I., Kaplan, H.S.: The cultivation of mouse bone marrow in vivo. Blood 14, 1040–1046 (1959)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berman, I., Kaplan, H.S.: The functional capacity of mouse bone marrow cells growing in diffusion chambers. Exp. Cell Res. 20, 238–239 (1960)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bøyum, A., Børgstrom, R.: The concentration of granulocytic stem cells in mouse bone marrow, determined with the diffusion chamber technique. Scand. J. Haematol. 7, 294–303 (1970)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Distasio, J.A., Lopez, D.M., Ghaffar, A., Silverman, M.A., Sigel, M.M.: Mechanism of specifically induced nonspecifically expressed cytotoxicity. J. Reticuloendothel. Soc. 24, 161–167 (1978)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lopez, D.M., Sigel, M.M.: Tumor antigen extracts stimulate cytotoxicity against unrelated target cells. Int. J. Cancer 18, 808–812 (1976)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopez, D.M., Sigel, M.M., Herbert, L.: Enhanced killer cell activities induced by progressive tumor growth. J. Reticuloendothel. Soc. 22, 431–443 (1977)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marmor, J.B., Russell, J.L., Miller, A.M., Robinson, S.H.: Modulation of murine granulocyte proliferation in diffusion chamber cultures. Blood 46, 39–50 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGarry, M.P., Miller, A.M.: Evidence for the humoral stimulation of eosinophil granulocytopoiesis in in vivo diffusion chambers. Exp. Hematol. 2, 372–379 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Medina, D., DeOme, K.B.: Response of hyperplastic alveolar nodule outgrowth line D1 to mammary tumor virus, nodule-inducing virus, and prolonged hormonal stimulation acting singly and in combination. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 42, 303 (1969)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller, A.M., McGarry, M.P.: A diffusible stimualtor of eosinophilopoiesis produced by lymphoid cells as demonstrated with diffusion chambers. Blood 48, 293 (1976)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, A.M., Colley, D.G., McGarry, M.P.: Spleen cells from Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice produce diffusible stimulator of eosinophilopoiesis in vivo. NatureGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perlmann, P., Perlmann, H.: 51Cr release from chicken erythrocytes: an assay system for measuring the cytotoxic activity of “non-specifically” activated lymphocytes in vitro. In: In vitro methods in cell-mediated immunity. Bloom, B., Glade, P.R. (eds.). New York, Academic Press 1971Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pfeffer, P., Bøyum, A.: Bone marrow cell culturing in double diffusion chambers. Scand. J. Haematol. 18, 129–136 (1977)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tyler, W.S., Niskanen, E., Stohlman, F. Jr., Keane, J., Howard, D.: The effect of neutropenia on myeloid growth and the stem cell in an in vivo culture system. Blood 40, 634–645 (1972)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tyler, W.S., Stohlman, F. Jr., Keane, J., Chovaniec, M., Howard, D.: Survival of murine hemopoietic cells in an in vivo culture system. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 146, 316–320 (1974)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Buessow
  • D. M. Lopez
  • A. M. Miller

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations