Cervical Spondylosis Myelopathy

  • B. Guidetti
  • A. Fortuna
  • C. Zamponi
  • P. P. Lunardi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Neurosurgery book series (NEURO, volume 8)

Abstract

For the purpose of treating Cervical Spondylosis Myelopathy (CSM) following etiopathogenetic factors have to be considered: a) spondylosis; b) stenosis of the cervical canal (3); c) mobility of the cervical spine (19). Surgical treatment can affect the various pathogenetic differently (7, 11, 27) and must be tailored to their relative importance in a given patient. These points were not altogether clear when we began to treat patients with CSM. Indeed, in the first series of 9 2 patients the operation was confined to a posterior laminectomy with section of the dentate ligaments or, in mediolateral spondylosis, with removal of the causal agent (12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 25). The results obtained were, as we shall show, less good than those achieved later with more rational procedures, which we have used in 311 cases.

Keywords

Neurol Tate Crest Radiculopathy Spondylosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ABOULKER, J., METZGER, J., DAVID, M., BALLIVET, J.: Les myelopathies cervicales d’origine rachidienne. Neuro-Chirurgie 11, 87–198 (1965)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    CANTORE, G.P., FORTUNA, A.: Intersomatic -usion with calf bone, “Kiel bone splint” in the anterior surgical approach for the treatment of myelopathy in cervical spondylosis. Acta Neurochir. 20, 59–62 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    CHRISPIN, A.R., LEES, F.: The spinal canal in cervical spondylosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 26, 166–170 (1963)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    CLOWARD, R.B.: The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J. Neurosurg. 15, 602–614 (1958)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    CLOWARD, R.B.: Lesions of the intervertebral disk and their treatment by interbody fusion methods. Clin. Orthop. 27, 51–77 (1963)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    CONNOLLY, E.S., et al.: Clinical evaluation of anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disk disease. J. Neurosurg. 23, 431–437 (1965)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DEREYMAKER, A., GHOSEZ, J.P., KENKES, R.: Le traitment chirurgical de la discopathie cervicale. Resultats comparés de l’abord posterieur (laminectomie) et de l’abord ventral (fusion corporeale), dans une cinquantaine de cas personnels. Neuro-Chirurgie 9, 13–20 (1963)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    EPSTEIN, J.A., LAVINE, L.S., ARONSON, H.A., EPSTEIN, B.S.: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: the syndrome of foraminal constriction treated by foramenotomy and the removal of osteophytes. Clin. Orthop. 40, 113–122 (1965)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    FAGER, C.A.: Results of adequate posterior decompression in the relief of spondylotic cervical myelopathy. J. Neurosurg. 38, 684–692 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    GONZALES-FERIA, L., et al.: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a cooperative study. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 78 (1), 19–33 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    GREGORIUS, F.K., ESTRIN, T., CRANDALL, P.H.: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study. Arch. Neurol. 33, 618–625 (1976)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    GUIDETTI, B.: Mielopatie da spondilosi cervicale. Bologna:Medica 1958Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    GUIDETTI, B.: Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. Acta Neurol. Latinoam. 7, 11–23 (1961)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    GUIDETTI, B., FORTUNA, A.: Trattamento conservativo e chirurgico delle mielopatie da discoartrosi. Relazione al XVI° Congresso Nationale di Neurologia. Rome, October 23–26 1967. Atti del Congresso, Vol. I, pp. 181–238. Rome: Pensiero Scientifico 1967Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    GUIDETTI, B., FORTUNA, A.: Long-term results of surgical treatment of myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis. J. Neurosurg. 30, 714–721 (1969)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    MAATZ, R., BAUERMEISTER, A.: A method of bone maceration. Results in animal experiments. J.B.J.S. 39-A, 153–162 (1957)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    PIEPGRASS, D.G.: Posterior decompression for myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis: laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with dentate ligaments section. Clin. Neurosurg. 24, 508–515 (1977)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    RAMANI, P.S., et al.: Cervical spinal interbody fusion with Kiel bone. Br. J. Surg. 62, 147–150 (1975)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    REID, J.D.: Effects of flexion-extension movements of the head and spine upon the spinal cord and nerve roots. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat, 23, 214–221 (1960)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ROBINSON, R.A., SMITH, G.W.: Anterolateral cervical disk removal and interbody fusion for cervical disk syndrome. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 96, 223–224 (1955)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ROBINSON, R.A., et al.: The results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J.B.J.S. 44-A, 1569–1587 (1962)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    SCOVILLE, W.B.: Cervical spondylosis treated by bilateral facetectomy and laminectomy. J. Neurosurg. 18, 423–428 (1961)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    SCOVILLE, W.B., DORHMAN, G.J., CORKILL, G.: Late results of cervical disk surgery. J. Neurosurg. 45, 203–210 (1976)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    STRACHAN, W.E.: Cervical myelopathy treated by anterior decompression and fusion. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 38 (8), 823 (1975)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    STOLTMANN, H.F., BLACKWOOD, W.: An anatomical study of the role of the dentate ligaments in the cervical spinal canal. J. Neurosurg. 24, 43–46 (1966)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    TAHERI, E., et al.: Experience with calf bone in cervical interbody spinal fusion. J. Neurosurg. 36, 67–71 (1972)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    VERBIEST, H.: La chirurgie anterieure et laterale du rachis cervical. Neuro-Chirurgie 16, Suppl. 2 (1970)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    WHITE, A.A., et al.: Relief of pain by anterior cervical spine fusion for spondylosis. A report of 65 patients. J.B.J.S. 55-A, 525–534 (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Guidetti
  • A. Fortuna
  • C. Zamponi
  • P. P. Lunardi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations