The use of noun phrases as so-called concealed questions may be a rather marginal phenomenon in natural languages, but it touches quite fundamentally on considerations about the notion of noun phrase scope and its proper role in a formal semantic description of natural language. My main point in this paper is that a theory that handles ordinary noun phrases fails to carry over to concealed questions in a simple straightforward manner. To illustrate this, I will list some inadequacies of an unsophisticated extension of MONTAGUE’S PTQ fragment . I will then offer a choice of two different remedies, neither of which seems to be the ultimate solution, however. Throughout my argumentation, I will completely ignore the fact that there are paraphrase relations between concealed and overt questions which may suggest interpreting the former via the latter. This doesn’t mean that I have any evidence which would rule out that sort of approach, but I do have some practical justification for my neglect. Unless otherwise indicated, I presuppose everything in PTQ, but that is just a matter of convenient presentation.
KeywordsNoun Phrase Relative Clause Phone Number Variable Assignment Individual Concept
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Baker, C.L. Indirect Questions in English, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, 1968.Google Scholar
- 2.Cooper, R. The Interpretation of Pronouns, in F. Heny and H. Schnelle (eds.) Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table, Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 10, Academic Press, New York, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- 3.Greenberg, B. A Semantic Account of Relative Clauses with Embedded Question Interpretations, ms., U.C.L.A., 1977.Google Scholar
- 4.Grimshaw, J. English Wh-Constructions and the Theory of Grammar, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1977.Google Scholar
- 5.Gupta, A. The Logic of Common Nouns, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1978.Google Scholar
- 7.Montague, R. Universal Grammar, in R. Thomason (ed.) Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1974.Google Scholar
- 8.Montague, R. The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English, in R. Thomason (ed.) Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1974.Google Scholar