Skip to main content
  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

The answers most frequently given to this question can be divided into two major categories, each of which includes a number of variants. The first holds that there is indeed a ruling class in the USSR, but there is no general agreement as to its nature and attributes. Some say it is a capitalist class, basically like the ruling classes in the developed capitalist countries though differing from them in relatively minor respects and degrees. Others maintain that there is a ruling class but that it is of a new type, differing in essentials from hitherto existing ruling classes. The second major category of answers holds that there is no ruling class in the USSR, arguing instead that state power is in the hands of a “bureaucracy,” but once again there is no consensus on the meaning of the term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. My understanding of this theory comes partly from more than 40 years of active interest and participation in discussions and debates over the interpretation of the Soviet experience, and more specifically from three published works: (1) Leon Trotsky, The Revolution Betrayed (1937), cited from the 1945 Pioneer Publishers edition;

    Google Scholar 

  2. (2) Trotsky, “The U.S.S.R. In War,” The New International, November 1939; and

    Google Scholar 

  3. (3) Ernest Mandel, “The Nature of the Soviet State,” New Left Review, No. 108, March—April 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a fuller exposition of this version of the Marxist theory of the state, see Paul M. Sweezy, The Theory of Capitalist Development (1942), chapter, 13. I should note, however, that it was presented there, at least by implication, as a theory specifically applicable to advanced capitalism and not as a universal theory of the state.

    Google Scholar 

  5. This is not to say that there were no serious differences among Marxists in that period on the theory of the state. But they related not to the role of classes and the centrality of the property system but rather to whether the revolutionary class could take over and utilize for its purposes the existing state (thesis of the reformists) or would have to smash the existing state and replace it with a new one (thesis of the revolutionaries). There is no doubt, as Lenin conclusively proved in The State and Revolution, that Marx himself held to the revolutionary thesis, which explains why he and the Bolsheviks generally applied the label “revisionist” to those adhering to the reformist thesis. But this dispute, despite its prominence and bitterness, should not be allowed to obscure the far-reaching agreement between the two factions on the basic meaning of revolution as the replacement of one property system by another.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Emphasis added.

    Google Scholar 

  7. “On the Nature of the Soviet State”, New Left Review, March-April, 1978, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A by no means exhaustive list includes Russia after Stalin (1953), Russia in Transition (1957), and Ironies of History (1966). The last-named is a collection of essays containing reprints from the 1957 volume plus other relevant writings of the same period.

    Google Scholar 

  9. II Manifesto, ed., Pouvoir et Opposition dans les Sociétés Post-Revolutionnaires, Paris, Seuil 1978, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  10. There remain important differences, of course, about this and other aspects of Soviet development. See my essays in the following issues of Monthly Review: November 1974, January 1975, March 1976, May 1977 (reply to Bernard Chavance), and October 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sweezy, P.M. (1979). Is There a Ruling Class in the USSR?. In: Laski, K., Matzner, E., Nowotny, E. (eds) Beiträge zur Diskussion und Kritik der neoklassischen Ükonomie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67326-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67326-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-67327-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-67326-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics