Does Coronary Bypass Surgery Prolong Life Expectancy?

  • R. J. Hall
  • D. A. Cooley
  • E. Garcia
  • V. S. Mathur
  • C. M. de CastroJr.
Conference paper

Abstract

While relief of disabling angina following coronary artery bypass (CAB) generally has been accepted, the influence of CAB upon long- term survival has remained controversial. Comparison of survival data of nonrandomized surgical series with “noncurrent” historic med­ical controls [1] has been criticized frequently, most recently by Braunwald [2], In addition, the results of two recent multicenter co­operative studies of patients with unstable angina (NHLI)[3] and sta­ble angina (VAH)[4], who were randomly assigned to medical or surgi­cal therapy, show no difference in long-term survival.

Keywords

Luminal Cardiol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bruschke, A.V.G., Proudfit, W.L., et al: Progress study of 590 consecutive nonsurgical cases of coronary disease followed 5-9 years. Circulation 47, 1147–1153 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braunwald, E.: Coronary-artery surgery at the crossroads. N. Engl. J. Med. 297, 661–663 (1977)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Cooperative Study Group of National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: Medical approach better than previously reported. In: Acute unstable angina. Clinical Trends in Cardiology 6, 1–3 (1977)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murphy, M.L., Hultgren, H.N., Detre, K., et al: Treatment of chronic stable angina: A preliminary report of survival data of the randomized Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. N. Engl. J. Med. 297, 621–626 (1977)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooley, D.A., Wukasch, D.C., Bruno, F., et al: Direct myocardial revascularization: Experience with 9,364 operations. Thorax 33, 411–417 (1978)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall, R.J., Garcia, E., Mathur, V.S., et al: Factors influencing early and late survival after aortocoronary artery bypass: A preliminary report. Cardio- vasc. Dis., Bull. Texas Heart Inst. 4, 120–128 (1977)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Russel, R.O., Moraski, R.E., Kouchoukos, N., et al: Unstable angina pectoris: National Cooperative Study Group to compare medical and surgical therapy. I. Report of protocol and patient population. Am. J. Cardiol. 37, 896–902 (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wukasch, D.C., Hall, R.J., Cooley, D.A., et al: Surgical versus medical treatment of coronary artery disease: Long-term survival. Vase. Surg. 10,. 300–314 (1976)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cutler, S.J., Ederer, F.: Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J. Chronic. Dis. 8, 699 (1958)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scheidt, S.S.: Unstable angina: Medical management or surgery? Editorial and comment. Cardiovasc. Med. 2, 541–543 (1977)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Detre, K., Hultgren, H., Takaro, T.: Veterans Administration Cooperative Study for coronary arterial occlusive disease. III. Methods and baseline characteristics, including experience with medical treatment. Am. J. Cardiol. 40, 212–225 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hutter, A.M., Russel, R.O., Resnekov, L., et al: Unstable angina pectoris: National randomized study of survival vs medical therapy: Results in 1, 2, and 3 vessel disease. Circulation 5556 [suppl. 3], 60 (1977)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. Hall
  • D. A. Cooley
  • E. Garcia
  • V. S. Mathur
  • C. M. de CastroJr.

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations