Effect of DMN, Phenobarbital and Halothane on the Sedimentation Characteristics of Rat Liver DNA

  • M. Schwarz
  • K. E. Appel
  • R. Rickart
  • H. W. Kunz
Part of the Archives of Toxicology book series (TOXICOLOGY, volume 2)

Abstract

Viable rat liver cells were isolated, and the velocity sedimentation characteristics of DNA centrifuged through alkaline sucrose gradients were studied following the administration in vivo of dimethylnitrosamine (DMN), phenobarbital and halothane. DMN application resulted in a strong decrease of sedimentation velocity, indicating generation of single strand breaks in DNA, whereas phenobarbital and halothane given in doses sufficient to induce liver enlargement did not alter the sedimentation behaviour of DNA from parenchymal or extraparenchymal liver cells.

Key words

Dimethylnitrosamine Phenobarbital Halothane Liver DNA 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berry, M. N., Friend, D. S.: High-yield preparation of isolated rat liver parenchymal cells. J. Cell Biol. 43, 506–520 (1969)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cox, R., Damjanov, I., Abanobi, S. E., Sarma, D. S. R.: A method for measuring DNA damage and repair in the liver in vivo. Cancer Res. 33, 2114–2121 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Damjanov, I., Cox, R., Sarma, D. S. R., Farber, E.: Patterns of damage and repair of liver DNA induced by carcinogenic methylating agents in vivo. Cancer Res. 33, 2112–2128 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Engelse Den, R., Philippus, E. J.: In vivo repair of rat liver DNA damaged by dimethylnitrosamine or diethylnitrosamine. Chem. Biol. Interact. 19, 111–124 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farber, E.: Carcinogenesis-Cellular evolution as a unifying thread: Presidential address. Cancer Res. 33, 2537–2550 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kunz, W., Schaude, W., Schmid, W., Siess, M.: Stimulation of liver growth by drugs. In: Proceedings of the European Society for the study of Drug Toxicity. Vol. VII, p. 113–153. International Congress Series Nr. 115. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica 1966Google Scholar
  7. Kunz, W., Appel, K. E., Jones, G. R. N., Rickart, R., Schaude, G., Schwarz, M., Stöckle, G.: Drug-induced liver growth and carcinogenesis: molecular mechanisms. Lecture given at the 20th Congress of the European Society of Toxicology, Berlin (West), June 1978Google Scholar
  8. Lutz, W. K., Schlatter, Ch.: In vivo covalent binding of chemicals to DNA as a short-term test for carcinogenicity. This volumeGoogle Scholar
  9. Mills, D. M., Zucker-Franklin, D.: Electron microscopic study of isolated Kupffer cells. Am. J. Pathol. 54, 147–155 (1969)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rossi, L., Ravera, M., Repetti, G., Santi, L.: Long-term administration of DDT or phenobarbital-Na in Wistar rats. Int. J. Cancer 19, 179–185 (1977)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Swenberg, J. A., Petzold, G. C., Harbach, P. R.: In vitro DNA damage/alkaline elution assay for predicting carcinogenic potential. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 72, 732–738 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Thorpe, E., Walker, A. I. T.: The toxicology of Dieldrin (HEOD). II. Comparative long-term oral toxicity studies in mice with dieldrin, DDT, phenobarbitone, β-BHC and γ-BHC. Fd. Cosmet. Toxicol. 11, 433–442 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Schwarz
    • 1
  • K. E. Appel
    • 1
  • R. Rickart
    • 1
  • H. W. Kunz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Toxicology, Institute of BiochemistryGerman Cancer Research CentreHeidelbergFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations