Skip to main content
Book cover

Engineering in Medicine pp 401–424Cite as

The Betavoltaic Pacemaker Power Source

  • Chapter

Summary

Developments in nuclear and chemical batteries have been applied during the past few years to increase the reliability and lifetime of the cardiac pacemaker. Although clinical use of the radioisotope-powered pacemaker dates only from 1970, statistics available to date confirm the expected superior reliability. More time is needed to confirm the relatively long lifetimes projected.

Two types of radioisotope batteries are in use: plutonium thermoelectric and promethium betavoltaic, each type having its individual merits. As compared with thermoelectric batteries, betavoltaic batteries have the advantage of smaller size and lower price and the disadvantage of being currently limited to a ten-year life. However, projected improvements in betavoltaic technology give good promise of extending this lifetime to 15 years if needed. The beta-voltaic battery Betacel ® has been qualified to NEA/AEC stress, corrosion and cremation fire standards and is licensed for clinical use by AEC and State authorities. Radiation safety requirements are well satisfied by the promethium-powered pacemaker. Risk-benefit factors to the patient and public are favorable to the use of this pacemaker in medical costs saved and deaths avoided.

Over 120 Betacel-powered pacemakers have been implanted in the U.S. and abroad. The clinical implantation program of the Biotronik-Betacel pacemaker is currently being expanded in the U.S. to a 50 per month rate.

Keywords

  • Power Source
  • Cardiac Pacemaker
  • Junction Device
  • Beta Source
  • Chemical Batterie

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-66187-7_25
  • Chapter length: 24 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-66187-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Laurens, “French nuclear-powered pacemaker program”, ANS Trans. 13, 508 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.W. Spickler, N.S. Rasor, P. Kezdi, S.N. Misra, K.E. Robins, and C. LeBoeuf, “Totally Self-Contained Intracardiac Pacemaker”, J. Electrocardiology 3, 325 (1970)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Ehrenberg, Chi-Shi Lang, and R. West, “The Electron Voltaic Effect”, Proc. Roy. Soc. 64, 424 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Rappaport, “The Electron-Voltaic Effect in p-n Junctions Induced by Beta Particle Bombardment”, Phys. Rev. 93, 246 (1953)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. W.G. Pfan, and W. Van Roosbroeck, “Radioactive and Photoelectric p-n Junction Power Sources”, J. Appl. Phys. 25, 1422 (1954)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Rappaport, J.J. Loferski, and E.G. Linder, “The Electron-Voltaic Effect in Germanium and Silicon P-N Junctions”, RCA Rev. 17, 100 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Flicker, J.J. Loferski, and T.S. Elleman, “Construction of a Promethium-147 Atomic Battery”, IEEE Trans. ED-11, 2 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  8. W.E. Matheson, “Higher Outputs and Efficiencies for Nuclear Batteries”, Space/ Aeronautics, February 1969

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.E. Knapp, et al., “Nuclear Electric Power Sources for Biomedical Applications”, Proc. of the Fourth IECEC, 699014, 101 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  10. L.C. Olsen, S.E. Seeman, and B.I. Griffin, “Betavoltaic Nuclear Electric Power Sources”, ANS Trans. 12, 481 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Bomal, A. Manim, and K. Steinschaden, “Prospects for Radiovoltaic Energy Conversion”, Second International Symposium on Power from Radioisotopes, Madrid, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  12. F.C. Gatt, “A Tritium Pacemaker Battery Design”, Page 278, Digest of 9th International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering, August 26, 1971, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  13. L.C. Olsen, “Betavoltaic Energy Conversion”, Energy Conversion 13, 117 (1972)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. L.C. Olsen, “Advanced Betavoltaic Power Sources”, Presented to 9th IECEC, San Francisco, California, August 1974

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.A. Klein, “Bandgap Dependence and Related Features of Radiation Ionization Energies in Semiconductors”, JAP 39, 2029 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.C. Sheppard, “Possible Reduction of the Pm-147 (y,n) Pm-146 Reaction by the Use of Graphite Irradiation Targets”, Paragraph 5–4. 2, Promethium Technology, American Nuclear Society, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nuclear Energy Agency “Interim Radiation Protection Standards for the Design, Construction, Testing and Control of Radioisotopic Cardiac Pacemakers”, NE (74) 8, Paris, April 1, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  18. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission “Interim Safety Guide for the Design and Testing of Nuclear Powered Cardiac Pacemakers”, March 26, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  19. “Technical Information for the Biotronik I KP Series Pacemaker Clinical Investigation Program”, McDonnell Douglas DWDL Report No. 746–169–1, August 1974

    Google Scholar 

  20. T.H. Smith, J. Greenborg, W.E. Matheson, “A Benefit/Risk Analysis of the Betacel®Battery Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemaker”, Presented to Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Biomedizinische Technik, Erlangen, Germany, McDonnell Douglas Paper No. WD 211C, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  21. “Risk-Benefit and Environmental Impact Analysis for Cardiac Pacemakers Powered by Betacel Pm-147 Batteries”, McDonnell Douglas Report DWDL736–127, June 1973

    Google Scholar 

  22. K.Z. Morgan, W.S. Snyder, and M.R. Ford, “Relative Hazard of the Various Radioactive Materials”, Health Physics 10, 151 (1964)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. E.E. Warner, “Comparison of Plutonium and Promethium Containment for Medical Applications”, Presented to Second International Symposium on Power from Radioisotopes, Madrid, Spain, McDonnell Douglas Paper No. WD 1896, May 1972

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Franco and M.L. Smith, “Benefits and Risks of Promethium Battery-Powered Pacemakers”, to be presented to International Symposium on Advances in Pacemaker Technology, Erlangen, Germany, September 1974

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. W. E. Matheson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Prof. Dr., Zentralinstitut für Biomedizinische Technik der Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen/Nürnberg, 852, Erlangen, Germany, Turnstr. 5

    Max Schaldach

  2. Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, N.Y., 10467, USA

    Seymour Furman M.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Springer-Verlag Berlin-Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matheson, W.E. (1975). The Betavoltaic Pacemaker Power Source. In: Schaldach, M., Furman, S. (eds) Engineering in Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66187-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66187-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-66189-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-66187-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive