Sensory Transduction in Insect Olfactory Receptors

  • Karl-Ernst Kaissling
Conference paper
Part of the Colloquium der Gesellschaft für Biologische Chemie 25.–27. April 1974 in Mosbach/Baden book series (MOSBACH, volume 25)

Abstract

Sensory transduction means the conversion of a physical or chemical stimulus into the excitation of a sensory (or receptor) cell. This process involves a number of steps which can be fully understood only by a combined effort of biophysicists, biochemists, morphologists and physiologists. To study sensory transduction it is also worthwhile to compare sensory systems adapted to different stimulus modalities, since the receptor organs differ considerably depending on their adequate form of stimulus energy.

Keywords

Sugar Cage Macromolecule Acetylcholine Decane 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, G., Delbrück,M.: Reduction of dimensionality in biological diffusion processes. In: Rich,A., Davidson,N. (Eds.): Struct. them. and molec. biology, pp. 198–215. San Francisco-London: Freeman Co. 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Bean, R. C., Shepiiard, W. C., Clan, H., Eichner, J.: Discrete conductance fluctuations in lipid bilayer protein membranes. J. gen. Physiol. 53, 741–757 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beidler,L.M.: A theory of taste stimulation. J. gen. Physiol. 38, 133–139 (1954).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boeckh,J, Kaissling,K.-E., Schneider, D.: Insect olfactory receptors. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 30, 263–280 (1965).Google Scholar
  5. Boheim, G.: Statistical analysis of alamethicin channels in black lipid membranes. J. Membrane Biol. (1974, in press).Google Scholar
  6. Butenandt, A., Beckmann, R., Stamm, D., Hecker, E.: Über den Sexuallockstoff des Seidenspinners Bombyx mori. Reindarstellung und Konstitution. Z. Naturforsch. 14b, 283–284 (1959).Google Scholar
  7. Butenandt, A., Hecker, E., Koch, W.: Über den Sexuallockstoff des Seidenspinners. IV. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 658, 39–64 (1962).Google Scholar
  8. Cone, R. A.: The early receptor potential of the vertebrate eye. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 30, 483–491 (1965).Google Scholar
  9. Dörrscheidt-Käfer, M.: Die Empfindlichkeit einzelner Photoreceptoren im Komplexauge von Calliphora erythrocephala. J. comp. Physiol. 81, 309–340 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. Dumpert, K.: Alarmstoffrezeptoren auf der Antenne von Lasius fuliginosus (Latr.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Z. vergl. Physiol. 76, 403–425 (1972).Google Scholar
  11. Ferkovich, S. M., Mayer, M. S., Rutter, R. R.: Conversion of the sex pheromone of the cabbage looper. Nature (Lond.) New Biol. 242, 53–55 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferkovich, S. M., Mayer, M. S., Rutter, R. R.: Sex pheromone of the cabbage looper: Reactions with antennal proteins in vitro. J. Insect Physiol. 19, 2231–2243 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hille, B.: Ionic channels in nerve membranes. Progr. Biophys. molec. Biol. 21, 1–32 (1970).Google Scholar
  14. Jacobson, M.: Insect sex pheromones, p. 382. New York: Academic Press 1972.Google Scholar
  15. Kafka,W.A.: Physiochemical aspects of odor recognition in insects. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. (in press). See also this volume.Google Scholar
  16. Kafka, W. A.: Analyse der molekularen Wechselwirkung bei der Erregung einzelner Riechzellen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 70, 105–143 (1970).Google Scholar
  17. Kaissling,K.-E.: Kinetics of olfactory receptor potentials. In: Pfaffmann (Ed.): III. Int. Symp. Olfaction and Taste, pp. 52–70. New York: Rockefeller Univ. Press 1969.Google Scholar
  18. Kaissling,K.-E.: Insect olfaction. In: Beidler,L.M. (Ed.): Handbook of sensory physiology IV/1, pp. 351–431. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1971.Google Scholar
  19. Kaissling, K.-E.: Kinetic studies on olfactory receptors of Bombyx mori. In: Schneider, D. (Ed.): Intern. Symp. Olfaction and Taste, pp. 207–213. Stuttgart: Wiss. Verlagsges. 1972.Google Scholar
  20. Kaissling,K.-E.: Chemoreception in the olfactory system. In: Schmitt, F. O. (Ed.): Functional linkage in biomolecular system New York: Raven Press (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Kaissling,K.-E.: Sensorische Transduktion bei Riechzellen von Insekten. 68. Verh. Deutsche Zool. Ges., Rathmeyer, W. (Ed.), (1974, in press).Google Scholar
  22. Kaissling,K.-E., Priesner,E.: Die Riechschwelle des Seidenspinners. Naturwissenschaften 57 23–28(1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kasang, G.: Tritium-Markierung des Sexuallockstoffes Bombykol. Z. Naturforsch. 23b, 1331–1335 (1968).Google Scholar
  24. Kasang, G.: Bombykol reception and metabolism on the antennae of the silkmoth Bombyx mori. In: Oiiloff, G., Thomas, A. F. (Eds.): Gustation and olfaction, pp. 245–250. London-New York: Academic Press 1971.Google Scholar
  25. Kasang, G.: Physikochemische Vorgänge beim Riechen des Seidenspinners. Naturwissenschaften 60, 95–101 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kasang, G., Kaissling, K.-E.: Specificity of primary and secondary olfactory processes in Bombyx antennae. In: Schneider, (Ed.): IV. Intern. Symp. Olfaction and Taste, pp. 200–206. Stuttgart: Wiss. Verlagsges. 1972.Google Scholar
  27. Kasang, G., Knauer, B., Beroza, M.: Uptake of the sex attractant 3Hdisparlure by male gypsy moth antennae (Lymantria dispar = Porthetria dispar). Experientia (Basel) 30, 147 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kasang, G., Weiss, N.: Dünnschichtchromatographische Analyse radioaktiv markierter Insektenpheromone. Metaboliten des 3H-Bombykols. J. Chromatog. 92, 401–417 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katz, B., Miledi,R.: The statistical nature of the acetylcholine potential and its molecular components. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 224, 665–699 (1972).Google Scholar
  30. Katz, B., Miledi, R.: The characteristics of “end-plate noise” produced by different depolarizing drugs. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 230, 707–717 (1973).Google Scholar
  31. Kirschfeld, K.: Discrete and graded receptor potentials in the compound eye of the fly Musca. Proc. Int. Symp. The Functional Organization of the Compound Eye, pp. 291–307. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1966.Google Scholar
  32. Morita, H.: Electrical signs of taste receptor activity. In: Pfaffmann, C. (Ed.): III. Intern. Symp. Olfaction and Taste, pp. 370–381. New York: Rockefeller Univ. Press 1969.Google Scholar
  33. Morita, H.: Properties of the sugar receptor site of the blowfly. In: Schneider, D. (Ed.): IV. Intern. Symp. Olfaction and Taste, pp. 357–363. Stuttgart: Wiss. Verlagsges. 1972.Google Scholar
  34. Neuwirth,J.: Multiple-site Wechselwirkung zwischen Duftmolekülen und Akzeptoren. Diplomarbeit an der Technischen Univ. München, Physik-Department. E 10, 60 p. (1973).Google Scholar
  35. Ogston,A.G.: Interpretation of experiments on metabolic processes, using isotopic tracer elements. Nature (Lond.) 162, 963 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Priesner, E.: Artspezifität und Funktion einiger Insektenpheromone. Fortschr. Zool. 22, 49–135 (1973).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Priesner, E., Jacobson, M., Bestmann, H. J.: Structure and electrophysio-logical activity of noctuid sex pheromones and analogues—an introductory report. Z. Naturforsch., in press.Google Scholar
  38. Roelofs, W. L., Comeau, A.: Sex pheromone perception: Synergists and inhibitors for the red-banded leaf roller attractant. J. Insect Physiol. 17, 435–448 (1971a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roelofs, W. L., Comeau, A.: Sex pheromone perception:Electroantennogram response of the red-banded leaf roller moth. J. Insect Physiol. 17, 1969–1982 (1971b).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneider, D.: Electrophysiologische Untersuchungen von Chemo-und Mechanorezeptoren der Antenne des Seidenspinners Bombyx mori L. Z. vergl. Physiol. 40 8–41 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schneider, D., Lacher, V., Kaissling,K.-E.: Die Reaktionsweise und das Reaktionsspektrum von Riechzellen bei Antheraea pernyi (Lepidoptera, Saturniidae). Z. vergl. Physiol. 48, 632–662 (1964).Google Scholar
  42. Scholes,J.: Discontinuity of the excitation process in locust visual cells. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 30, 517–527 (1965).Google Scholar
  43. Steinbeeciit, R. A.: Der Feinbau olfaktorischer Sensillen des Seidenspinners (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Z. Zellforsch. 139, 533–565 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steinbrecht, R. A., Müller, B.: On the stimulus conducting structures in insect olfactory receptors. Z. Zellforsch. 117, 570–575 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Steinbrecht, R. A., Kasang, G.: Capture and conveyance of odour molecules in an insect olfactory receptor. In: Schneider, D. (Ed.): IV. Intern. Symp. Olfaction and Taste, pp. 193–199. Stuttgart: Wiss. Verlagsges. 1972.Google Scholar
  46. Thorson,J., Biederman-Thorson,M.: Distributed relaxation processes in sensory adaptation. Science 183, 161–172 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thurm, U.: Untersuchungen zur funktionellen Organisation sensorischer Zeltverbände. Verh. dtsch. Zool. Ges. Köln, 79–88 (1970).Google Scholar
  48. Thurm, U.: The generation of receptor potentials in epithelial receptors. In: Schneider, D. (Ed.): IV. Symp. Olfaction and taste, pp. 95–101. Stuttgart: Wiss. Verlagsges. 1972.Google Scholar
  49. Thurm,U.:Basics of the generation of receptor potentials in epidermal mechanoreceptors on insects. “Mechanoreception” Symposium, Bochum Schwartzxopff,J. (Ed.): Abh. d. Rhein. Westfäl. Akademie der Wiss. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag (1974, in press).Google Scholar
  50. Trusciieit, E., Eiter, K.: Synthese der vier isomeren Hexadecadien-(10, 12)ole-(1). Liebigs Ann. Chem. 658, 65–90 (1962).Google Scholar
  51. Vareschi,E.: Duftunterscheidung bei der Honigbiene—Einzelzell-Ableitungen und Verhaltensreaktionen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 75, 143–173 (1971).Google Scholar
  52. Webb, E. C.: Cited in Dixon, M., Webb, E. C.: Enzymes, p. 218ff. London: Longmans, Green & Co. 1966.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl-Ernst Kaissling
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für VerhaltensphysiologieSeewiesen und Erling-AndechsSeewiesenFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations