Advertisement

Masking Patterns and Lateral Inhibition

  • T. Houtgast
Part of the Communication and Cybernetics book series (COMMUNICATION, volume 8)

Abstract

The main issue of this contribution is a comparison among several types of psychophysical masking patterns in the light of one specific electrophysiological “fact” about the neural coding of a masker’s sound spectrum, namely lateral inhibition. Masking experiments were performed in a number of different ways, in which the temporal presentation of masker and test tone was a main variable. We essentially found two types of results: one type, in those cases where the test tone was superimposed on the masker (direct masking), which consistently shows no effects related to lateral inhibition, and a second type, when masker and test tone were presented nonsimultaneously (e.g., forward masking), which consistently does show effects related to lateral inhibition. Thus, it would appear that only this latter type of masking pattern is closely related to the neural coding of a masker’s sound spectrum.

Keywords

Lateral Inhibition Hearing Threshold Mask Pattern Noise Band Test Tone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arthur, R.M., Pfeiffer, R.R. and Suga, N. (1971). “Properties of ‘Two-Tone inhibition’ in Primary Auditory Neurons,” J. Physiol. 212, 593–609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Greenwood, D.D. and Goldberg, J.M. (1970). “Response of Neurons in the Cochlear Nuclei to Variations in Noise Bandwidth and to Tone-Noise Combinations, ”J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 47, 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Houtgast, T. (1973). “Psychophysical Experiments on ‘Tuning Curves’ and‘Two-Tone Inhibition’,” Acustica 29, 168–179.Google Scholar
  4. Houtgast, T. (1974a). Lateral Suppression in Bearing; A Psychophysical Study on the Ear ’s Capability to Preserve and Enhance Spectral Contrasts (Institute for Perception TN0, Soesterberg, the Netherlands).Google Scholar
  5. Houtgast, T. (1974b). “Lateral Suppression and Loudness Reduction of a Tone in Noise,” to be published in Acustica.Google Scholar
  6. Kate, J.H. ten, Bilsen, F.A., Raatgever, J. and Buunen, T.J.F. (1974). “Single Unit Responses in Acoustic Nuclei of Cat to Noise and Its Attenuated Repetition,” submitted to 8th I.C.A., London.Google Scholar
  7. Kiang, N.Y.S. (1965). discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cats Auditory Nerve (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
  8. Sachs, M.B. and Kiang, N.Y.S. (1968). “Two-Tone Inhibition in Auditory- Nerve Fibers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 43, 1120–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Spinger-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Houtgast
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Perception TNOSoesterbergThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations