Skip to main content

Comments on: “A Model for mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory Receptor” (Schroeder and Hall)

  • Conference paper
Facts and Models in Hearing

Part of the book series: Communication and Cybernetics ((COMMUNICATION,volume 8))

  • 267 Accesses

Abstract

Schroeder and Hall’s model gives an elegant and easily visualizable description of adaption of the auditory receptor cell. However, other features of the model, including mathematical analysis of the transfer properties of the model, have received considerable attention in the literature (Siebert and Gray, 1963; Siebert, 1965, 1968, 1970, 1972; Duifhuis, 1971, 1972). In particular Siebert’s 1972 paper proposes a rate function identical to the one following from the present model (including saturation). The models taking account of synchronization are using non-homogeneous Poisson processes. Even after discretization of time this term appears adequate as long as the bin-width is small enough to allow no more than one spike per time-bin (before averaging).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Duifhuis, H. (1971).“A tentative firing model for the auditory receptor cell,” (presented at the 7th ICA, Budapest).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duifhuis, H. (1972). Perceptual Analysis of Sound, Ph.D. thesis, Eindoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, W.M. and Gray, P.R. (1963). “Random process model for the firing pattern of single auditory neurons,” MIT - RLE - QPR, 71, 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, W.M.(1965). “Some implications of the stochastic behavior of primary auditory neurons,” Kybernetik.2, 206–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, W.M. (1968). “Stimulus transformations in the peripheral auditory system,” in: Recognizing Patterns, Kohlers, P.A. and Eden, M. (eds.), (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, W.M. (1970). “Frequency discrimination on the auditory system: Place or periodicity mechanisms?” Proc. IEEE 58, 723–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, W.M. (1972). “What limits auditory performance?” Proc. 4th Conf. Int, Union of Pure and Applied Bio., Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.L. (1973). Short-term Adaptation and Incremental Responses of Single Auditory-nerve Fibers. Ph.D. thesis, Syracuse University, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Spinger-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Duifhuis, H. (1974). Comments on: “A Model for mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory Receptor” (Schroeder and Hall). In: Zwicker, E., Terhardt, E. (eds) Facts and Models in Hearing. Communication and Cybernetics, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65902-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65902-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-65904-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-65902-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics