Historical View of the Interest in Intracranial Pressure

  • J. P. Evans

Abstract

Those of us who are old enough to have lived several decades of our lives before the onset of the Second World War, and whose training period therefore demanded much less of us bibliographically than is the case today, tend to be concerned over our younger colleagues. As we observe those working in the field of intracranial pressure, elaborately equipped with multiple strain gauges, amplifiers, radioisotopic tracers and other implements — and then see them faced with the inordinate demands of a burgeoning literature — we are concerned lest they fail to look back over their shoulder, and thus fail to employ that most useful scientific instrument, the retrospectroscope. Through such failure they risk repeating the errors of history. To be quite honest with you, my original intent as I began the preparation of this paper, was to preserve my listeners from that same risk. Thus I quite diligently and with no little personal profit reviewed a considerable portion of the literature on the cerebrospinal fluid. But my serious and pedantic interest was quickly dispelled when I faced compressing into a few pages the field that has already been so amply covered. Outstanding among reviews is the excellent historical section in Nils Lundberg’s monograph in the 1960 Acta [1], which is a model of bibliographic reporting. In 1962 there appeared the succinct and very readable and well illustrated “historical introduction” to the small text entitled The Anatomy of the Cerebrospinal Fluid by Millen and Woolam of Cambridge Univ [2].

Keywords

Corn Europe Respiration Hydrocephalus Congo 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lundberg, N.: Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta. psychiat. scand. (Suppl. 149) 36, 1–193 (1960).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Millen, J. W., Woollam, D. H. M.: The Anatomy of the Cerebrospinal Fluid, pp. 151. London: Oxford University Press 1962.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lups, S., Haan, A. M. G. H.: The Cerebrospinal Fluid, pp. 350. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1954.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davson, H.: Physiology of the Cerebrospinal Fluid, Chapter 10, p. 337–383. Boston: Little Brown and Co. 1967.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Viets, H. R.: Domenico Cotugno: His description of the cerebrospinal fluid, with a translation of his Des Ischiade Nervosa Commentarias (1764) and a bibliography of his important works. Bull. Hist. Med. 3, 701–738 (1935).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Key, A., Retzius, G.: Studien in der Anatomie des Nervensystems und des Bindegewebes, 2 vols. Stockholm 1876.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cappie, James: Brain 2, p. 373–385 (1879–1880).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cushing, H. C.: Studies in Intracranial Physiology. London: Oxford University Press 1926. Lecture I. The Third Circulation and its Channels, pp. 1–51.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quincke, H.: Über Hydrocephalus. Verhandl. des Cong, für Inn. Med. 10, 321–340 (1891).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ryder, H. W., Espey, F. F., Kristoff, F. V., Evans, J. P.: Observations on the interrelationships of intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow. J. Neurosurg. 8, 46–58 (1951).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guillaume, J., Janny, P.: Monométrie intracranienne continue. Intérêt de la méthode et premiers résultats. Rev. neurol. (Paris) 84, 131–142 (1951).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldensohn, E. S., Whitehead, W. R., Parry, T. M., Spencer, J. N., Grover, R. F., Draper, W. B.: Effect of diffusion respiration and high concentrations of CO2 on cerebrospinal fluid pressure of anesthetized dogs. Amer. J. Physiol. 135, 334–340 (1951).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Evans

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations