Stability Regions of Cellular Fluid Flow

  • F. H. Busse
Part of the International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics book series (IUTAM)


It is well known that the Navier-Stokes equation of motion for a homogeneous incompressible fluid has a unique stationary solution, if the body forces acting on the fluid and the prescribed values of the velocity at the boundary are sufficiently small. We shall call this solution the primary solution. While the primary solution is a possible solution for all values of the prescribed parameters, it is not unique anymore when the parameters exceed certain critical values. The simplest kind of nonuniqueness is caused by stationary secondary solutions for which the principle of exchange of stability holds, i.e. the secondary solution branching off the primary solution becomes stable in place of the primary solution for values of the relevant parameter beyond the critical branching point. Physically this process corresponds to the appearance of a secondary motion superimposed onto the primary state of the fluid system. The secondary motion is usually char-acterized by a typical scale which is not shown by the primary state and which is exhibited in the form of a cell-like subdivision of the flow field. It is for this reason that the secondary motion for which the principle of exchange of stability holds has been called cellular flow.


Prandtl Number Rayleigh Number Stability Region Stability Boundary Primary Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Schlüter, A., Lortz, D., Busse, F.: J. Fluid Mech. 28, 129 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Busse, F. H.: J. Fluid Mech. 30, 625 (1967).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eckhaus, W.: Studies in Non-Linear Stability Theory, Berlin/Heidelberg/ New York: Springer 1965.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Snyder, H. A.: J. Fluid Mech. 35, 273 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Busse, F. H.: J. Math, and Phys. 46, 140 (1967).MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Busse, F. H.: Dissertation, University Munich 1962.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Newell, A. C., Whitehead, J. A.: J. Fluid Mech. 38, 279 (1969).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Segel, L. A.: J. Fluid Mech. 38, 203 (1969).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. H. Busse
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für Physik und AstrophysikMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations