Interacting Markov Processes

  • Thomas M. Liggett
Part of the Lecture Notes in Biomathematics book series (LNBM, volume 38)


Interacting Markov processes are obtained by superimposing some type of interaction on many otherwise independent Markovian subsystems. As a result of the interaction, the subsystems fail to have the Markov property; the system as a whole remains Markovian, however. This subject has grown rapidly during the past decade. It is a branch of modern probability theory, but it draws much of its inspiration and motivation from various areas of science, including physics and biology.


Invariant Measure Ergodic Theorem Exclusion Process Infinite System Duality Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Brains on and D. Griffith (1979). On the Williams-Bjerknes tumour growth model, to appear.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Clifford and A. Sudbury (1973). A model for spatial conflict, Biometrika 60, 581–588.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. L. Dobrushin (1971). Markov processes with a large number of locally interacting components, Problems of Information Transmission 7, 149–164.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Durrett (1979). On the growth of one dimensional contact processes, to appear.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Griffeath (1978). Limit theorems for nonergodic set-valued Markov processes, Annals of Probability 6, 379–387.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Griffeath (1979). Additive and Cancellative Interacting Particle Systems, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 724.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. E. Harris (1974). Contact interactions on a lattice, Annals of Probability 2, 969–988.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. E. Harris (1976). On a class of set-valued Markov processes, Annals of Probability 4, 175–194.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Holley (1972). An ergodic theorem for interacting systems with attractive interactions, Z. Wahr. verw. Geb. 24, 325–334.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Holley (1974). Recent results on the stochastic Ising model, Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics 4, 479–496.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Holley and T. M. Liggett (1975). Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting infinite systems and the voter model, Annals of Probability 3, 643–663.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Holley and T. M. Liggett (1978). The survival of contact processes, Annals of Probability 6, 198–206.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Holley and D. Stroock (1976). Applications of the stochastic Ising model to the Gibbs states, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 249–265.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. M. Liggett (1973). A characterization of the invariant measures for an infinite particle system with interactions, Transactions of the A.M.S. 179, 433–453.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. M. Liggett (1976). Coupling the simple exclusion process, Annals of Probability 4, 339–356.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. M. Liggett (1977). The stochastic evolution of infinite systems of interacting particles, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 598, 188–248.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. M. Liggett (1978). Attractive nearest neighbor spin systems on the integers, Annals of Probability 6, 629–636.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. M. Liggett (1979). Long range exclusion processes, Annals of Probability, to appear.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Schwartz (1977). Applications of duality to a class of Markov processes, Annals of Probability 5, 522–532.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Spitzer (1970). Interaction of Markov processes, Advances in Mathematics 5, 246–290.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. Spitzer (1974). Recurrent random walk of an infinite particle system, Transactions of the A.M.S. 198, 191–199.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. G. Sullivan (1974). A unified existence and ergodic theorem for Markov evolution of random fields, Z. Wahr. verw. Geb. 31, 47–56.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas M. Liggett
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations