Advertisement

Abstract

The following two lectures were delivered in December 1947 at the Cavendish Laboratory, as an introduction to discussions on two different topics in atomic theory.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. (1).
    Compare, for example, G. Wentzel, Quantumtheorie der Wellenfelder, Wien, Deuticke, 1943.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    W. Pauli. Report on an International Conference on Fundamental Particles and Low Temperatures, 1, 5, 1947, London, Taylor Si Francia.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    W. Heisenberg. Ann. d. Phys., Lpz., (5), 32, 20, 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    C. M. G. Lattes, G. P. S. Ocuroliniand C. F. Powell. Nature, Land., 160, 453, 486, 1947.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    W. Heisenberg. Z. Phys. 101, 533, 1936.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    J. F. Carlson and J. R. Oppenheimer. Phys. Rev. 51, 220, 1937.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    H. Bhabha and W. Heitler Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 159, 432, 1937.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    The most recent paper is that by W. H. Fretter, Phys. Rev. 73, 41, 1948, in which numerous quotations on the earlier work are given.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    H. W. Lewis, J. R. Oppenheimer and S. A. Wouthuyaen. Phys. Rev. 73, 127, 1948.ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Compare J. Frenkel. J. Phys. U.S.S.R. 9, 465, 1945.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    R. Becker and G. Lempried. Phys. Rev. 69, 34, 1946.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    G. D. Rochester and C. C. Butler. Nature, Lend., 160, 855, 1947.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    W. Heisenberg. Z. Phys. 120, 513, and 073, 1943; Z. Naturforsch. 1, 608, 1946.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Ch. Moller. K. danke videnk. Selak. 23, no. 1, 1945; 24, no. 19, 1946; Nature, Lend., 158, 403, 1946.Google Scholar
  15. S. T. Ma. Phys. Rev. 69, 668, 1946; 71, 195, 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Ter Haar. Phyeiea. Google Scholar
  17. (14).
    C. F. vote Weizsaegker. Z. Phys. 118, 489, 1941.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (15).
    N. Bohr. Report on the International Congress on Physics in Rome, 1931.Google Scholar
  19. (1).
    F. and H. London. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 149, 71, 1935.ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. F. London, Une conception nouvelle de la euperconductébiliti, Paris, 1937; Nature, Lond., 140, 796, 834, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (2).
    M. V. Lave. Ann. Phys., Lpz., (5), 32, 71, 253, 1938; Theorie der Supraleitung, Springer, Berlin, 1946.Google Scholar
  22. (3).
    R. ns L. Kaosera. Z. Phys. 78, 744, 1932; 80, 203, 1932.Google Scholar
  23. (4).
    H. Welker. Phys. Z. 39, 920, 1938.Google Scholar
  24. (5).
    W. Heisenberg. Z. Naturforsch. 2a, 185, 1947; 3e, 65, 1948.Google Scholar
  25. H. Korre. Ann. Phye., Lpz., (6), 1, 406, 1847; Z. Naturforsch. 3a, 1, 1948.Google Scholar
  26. (6).
    B. Lasarevand L. Kerr. J. Phys. U.S.S.R. 8, no. 6, 361, 1944.Google Scholar
  27. (7).
    C. S. Goarca and H. Cssrtsnr. Z. techn. Phys. 15, 539, 1934; Flips. Z. 35, 963, 1934.Google Scholar
  28. (8).
    W. J. De Haas and H. Breslea. Commun. Phys. Lab. Univ. Leiden, no. 214d, 1931.Google Scholar
  29. (9).
    W. J. de Haas and A. Radeoaxeas. Physica, 7, 992, 1940.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (10).
    D. Shoenbese. Nature, Lend., 143, 434, 1939; Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 175, 49, 1940.Google Scholar
  31. M. Dkszsonrand D. Shoenbero. Nature, Lond., 159, 201, 1947.Google Scholar
  32. (11).
    A. B. Pirrard. Nature, Land., 159, 434, 1947.Google Scholar
  33. (12).
    H. London. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 176, 522, 1940.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (13).
    A. B. Pittard. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 191, 385, 399, 1947.ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. (14).
    G. E. H. Rsxrrsa and E. H. Sondemnnar. Nature, Lend., 161, 394, 1848.Google Scholar
  36. (15).
    W. Heisenbero. Nachr. Ges. Wise. Göttingen, 1946.Google Scholar
  37. (16).
    J. G. Damerand K. Mendelasorn. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 185, 226, 1946; Nature, Lend., 150, 604, 1942.Google Scholar
  38. (17).
    A. Sommerfeld. Z. Plays. 118, 487, 1941.ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. (18).
    A. Sommerfeld and H. Beihaa. Handb. Plays. xxiv, 2, 555, Berlin, 1933.Google Scholar
  40. (19).
    E. Joan. Ann. Plays., Lpz., 42, 84, 1942; Phys. Z. 43, 130, 1942.Google Scholar
  41. (20).
    J. H. Van Vleok. Theory of Electric and Magnetic Susceptibilities,Oxford, 1932, especially p. 276.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Heisenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for PhysicsGöttingenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations