Venovenous Allotransplantation in the Rat

  • T. Schang
  • B. von Gaudecker
  • A. Thiede
Conference paper


In previous studies Engemann et al. (1977) and Körner (1979) were able to demonstrate that vein grafts transplanted into the venous system have the capacity to sensitize allogeneic recipients. Vein grafting led to accelerated rejection of subsequent donor-type skin grafts and production of cytotoxic antibodies to donor-type tissue. But all allogeneic vein grafts showed long-term patency, and histologically they appeared to be intact when investigated between day 20 and day 100 postoperatively. Especially no mononuclear cellular infiltrations could be found within this period. Allogeneic vein grafts in nonimmunosuppressed recipients were not distinguishable from syngeneic vein grafts 100 days postoperatively. These findings were unexpected, because arterial allografts (Thiede et al. 1979; Timmermann and Thiede 1981) as well as venous allografts (Deltz 1977) used for arterial replacement in the rat underwent a marked cellular infiltration even if long-term patency was achieved. Therefore the aim of our study was to compare syngeneic and allogeneic venovenous grafts by means of morphometric methods. Especially morphological alterations of the vein grafts occurring in the early postoperative phase needed investigation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Deltz E, Sonntag H, Thiede A (1977) Funktionelle and morphologische Untersuchungen bei allogenen Venentransplantaten. Vasa 6:211–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Engemann R, Körner H, Thiede A (1977) Microsurgical venous replacement in allogeneic rat strain combinations. Twelfth Congress of the European Society of Surgical Research, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  3. Gronemeyer U (1979) Zur Immunbiologie der Hornhauttransplantation. Modelluntersuchungen an Inzuchtratten.Habilitationsschrift, University of KielGoogle Scholar
  4. Körner H (1979) Veno-ven6se Transplantationen in standardisierten Ratteninzuchtstammkombinationen. Die Bedeutung der Sensibilisierung fur das Transplantatverhalten. Thesis University of KielGoogle Scholar
  5. Thiede A, Engemann R, K6rner H, Mfiller-Ruchholtz W (1979) Comparison of the immunological reactions of arterial transplants in the arterial system and of venous transplants in the venous system using inbred strains of rats. Transplant Proc 11:603–609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Timmermann W, Thiede A (1981) Histologische and funktionelle Untersuchungen an Femoralarterientransplantaten bei Batten. Vasa 10:141–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Williams GM, terHaar A, Krajewski C, Parks LC, Roth J (1975) Rejection and repair of endothelium in major vessel transplants. Surgery 78:694–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Zilles K, Schleicher A, Kretschmann HJ (1978) A quantitative approach to cytoarchitectonics. The anal pattern of the cortex of Tupaiabelangeri. Anat Embryol (Bert) 153:195–212Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Schang
  • B. von Gaudecker
  • A. Thiede

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations