Abstract

In cohort studies (and clinical trials), subjects are followed in a forward direction from exposure to outcome. Inferential reasoning is from cause to effect.

Keywords

Obesity Migration Estrogen Adenocarcinoma Stratification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Feinstein AR (1973) Clinical biostatistics. XX. The epidemiologic trohoc, the ablative risk ratio, and “retrospective” research. Clin Pharmacol Ther 14: 291–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miettinen OS (1985) The “case-control” study: valid selection of subjects. J Chronic Dis 38: 543–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR (1978) Alternative analytic methods for case-control studies of estrogens and endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med 299: 1089–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jick H, Walker AM, Rothman KJ (1980) The epidemic of endometrial cancer: a commentary. Am J Public Health 70: 264–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shapiro S, Kaufman DW, Slone D, Rosenberg C, Miettinen OS, Stolley PD, Rosenshein NB, Watring WG, Leavitt T, Knapp RC (1980) Recent and past use of conjugated estrogen in relation to adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. N Engl J Med 303: 485–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kramer MS (1981) Do breast-feeding and delayed introduction of solid foods protect against subsequent obesity? J Pediatr 98: 883–887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H (1982) Epidemiologic research: principles and quantitative methods. Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, CA, p 146Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miettinen OS (1976) Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol 103: 226–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berkson J (1946) Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data. Biometr Bull 2: 47–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walter SD (1980) Berkson’s bias and its control in epidemiologic studies. J Chronic Dis 33: 721–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lippman A, Mackenzie SG (1985) What is “recall bias” and does it exist? In: Marois M (ed) Prevention of physical and mental congenital defects. Part C. Basic and medical science, education, and future strategies. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 205–209Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) Statistical methods in cancer research, vol 1. The analysis of case-control studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp 162–189Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schlesselman JJ (1982) Case-control studies: design, conduct, analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 213–219Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. JNCI 22: 719–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feinstein AR (1985) Experimental requirements and scientific principles in case-control studies. J Chronic Dis 38: 127–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibrahim MA (ed) (1979) The case-control study: consensus and controversy. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR (1979) Methodological standards and contradictory results in case-control research. Am J Med 66: 556–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hayden GF, Kramer MS, Horwitz RI (1982) The case-control study: a practical review for the clinician. JAMA 247: 326–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael S. Kramer
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations