Patient Package Inserts: Carriers of Consensus Information

  • R. Vander Stichele
Conference paper
Part of the Health Systems Research book series (HEALTH)


In the information network surrounding the individual patient, there are many oral information sources, each playing its role. The health professionals, i.e., physicians and pharmacists, are the information sources preferred by the patient [1, 2]. Field studies, however, have demonstrated that information from these sources is limited, especially with regard to risk communication [3, 4]. Traditionally, there has been very little cooperation between physicians and pharmacists in bringing information about medications to the patient [5, 6] (Fig. 1). A social network of relatives and friends surrounds the patient. Patients consult this network when in trouble, e.g., when deciding whether to seek professional help or to start (or continue) taking medication. The media influence the patient directly, and through the social network. Some of the information provided by these sources is repetitive, some is conflicting, and some diverges from accepted knowledge.


Risk Communication Drug Information Branded Product Original Drug Pharmacy Refill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Morris LA, Grossman R, Barkdoll GL, Gordon E, Soviero C (1984) A survey of patient sources of prescription drug information. Am J Public Health 74: 1161–1162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baldwin HJ, Cosier LE, Schulz RM (1987) Opinion leadership in medication information. Commun Q 35: 84–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morris LA (1982) A survey of patients’ receipt of prescription drug information. Med Care 20: 596–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scherwitz L, Hennrikus D, Yysim S, Lester J, Vallbona C (1985) Physician communication to patients regarding medications. Pat Educ Couns 7: 121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norwood GJ, Seibert JJ, Gagnon JP (1976) Attitudes of rural consumers and physicians toward expanded roles for pharmacists. J Am Pharm Assoc 16: 551–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Woroniecki CL, McKercher PL, Flagler DG, Berchou R, Cook JA (1982) Effect of pharmacist counseling on drug information recall. Am J Hosp Pharm 39: 1907–1910PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herxheimer A, Davies C (1982) Drug information for patients: bringing together the messages from prescriber, pharmacist and manufacturer. J Roy Coll Gen Pract 32: 93–97Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vander Stichele R, Bogaert MG (1989) Patient package inserts: the Belgian experience with a mandatory program. Drug Inf J 23: 673–677Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leventhal H, Cameron L (1987) Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. Pat Educ Couns 10: 117–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sauer F (1989) EEC regulatory initiatives on drug information. In: Bogaert M, Vander Stichele R, Kaufman JM, Lefebvre R (eds) Patient package insert as a source of drug information. Excerpta Medica, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Vander Stichele

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations