Advertisement

Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Causes of Sterility

  • K. H. Broer
Conference paper

Keywords

Penetration Test Motile Spermatozoon Cervical Mucus Cervical Secretion Periovulatory Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander N (1981) Evaluation of male infertility with an in vitro cervical mucus penetrations test. Fertil Steril 36:201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Asch RH et al (1985) A modern treatment for infertile couples: gift. Am Fert Soc Progr Suppl 18Google Scholar
  3. Broer KH (1981) Diagnostik und Therapie zervikaler Sterilitätsursachen. In: Kaiser R, Schumacher GFB (eds) Menschliche Fortpflanzung. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  4. Broer KH (1978) Improvement of motility and morphology of human spermatozoa by filtration assay. In: Emperaire JC, Audebert A (eds) 1st International Symposium on Artificial Insemination: Homologous and Male Subfertility. Bordeaux, p. 188Google Scholar
  5. Broer KH, Winkhaus I (1978) Die Bedeutung des Postcoitaltestes in der Sterilitätsberatung. Fortschr Med 96:351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Broer KH, Hirschhäuser C, Kaiser R (1975a) Morphology of human spermatozoa before and after migration through cervical mucus in vitro. IRCS Med Sci 3:145Google Scholar
  7. Broer KH, Hirschhäuser C, Kaiser R (1976) Filterfunktion der Cervix uteri. Fortschr Fertilitätsforsch 3:36Google Scholar
  8. Broer KH, Dauber U, Kaiser R (1977a) A filtering method of cleaning up spermatozoa in cases of asthenospermia. Fertil Steril 28:335Google Scholar
  9. Broer KH, Schaal P, Siepel G (1977b) In vitro investigations about influence of bacterial infection upon spermatozoa migration through cervical mucus. Fertil Steril 18:397Google Scholar
  10. Broer KH, Knieps U, Kaiser R (1978) Verbesserung der Spermatozoenmotilität und Reproduzierbarkeit im in vitro-Penetrationstest. Fortschr SterilitätsforschGoogle Scholar
  11. Broer KH, Teepe W, Kaiser R (1975b) Untersuchungen zur Filterfunktion der Cervix uteri. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 35:697Google Scholar
  12. Davaian V, Kulinitake M (1969) Fractional in vivo and in vitro examination of postcoital cervical mucus in the human. Fertil Steril 20:197Google Scholar
  13. Davaian V, Nakamura R, Kharma K (1970) Spermatozoan transport in cervical mucus. Obstet Gynec Surv 25:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eggert-Kruse W, Runnebaum B (1989) Clinical significance of crossed in vitro spermcervical mucus penetration test in infertility investigation. Fertil Steril 6:1032Google Scholar
  15. Giner J, Merino G, Luna J, Aznar R (1974) Evaluation of the Sims-Huhner postcoital test in fertile couples. Fertil Steril 25:145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Glass RG, Mrouheh A (1967) The postcoital test and semen analysis. Fertil Steril 18:314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Herwitt JJ, Steptoe PC (1985) Treatment of idiopathic infertility, cervical mucus hostality and male infertility. Fertil Steril 44:350Google Scholar
  18. Insler V (1977) Evaluation and treatment of cervical mucus diseases leading to infertility. In: Mucus in health and disease 1977. p. 477Google Scholar
  19. Insler V, Melmed H, Eichenbrenner I, Serr D, Lunenfeld B (1972) The cervical score. Int J Gynec Obstet 10:223Google Scholar
  20. Kaiser R (1977) Anatomie and Physiologie der Fortpflanzung. In: Martius G (ed) Lehrbuch der Geburtshilfe. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  21. Kremer J (1965) A simple sperm penetration test. Int H Fertil 10:201Google Scholar
  22. Kremer J, Jager S (1992) Tne significance of antisperm antibodies for sperm cervical mucus interaction. Hum Repr 7:781Google Scholar
  23. Miller EG Jr, Kurzrok R (1932) Biochemical studies of human semen III. Factors effecting migration of sperm through the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynec 24:19Google Scholar
  24. Moghissi KS (1976) Postcoital test: physiologic basis, technique, and interpretation. Fertil Steril 27:2Google Scholar
  25. Moghissi KS, Darich D, Lebine J et al (1964) Mechanism of spermigration. Fertil Steril 15:15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Perloff WH, Steinberger E (1973) In vivo penetration of cervical musus bei spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 14:231Google Scholar
  27. Rabe T, Runnebaum B (1994) Funktionsteste und Untersuchungsmethoden in der gynäkologischen Endokrinologie und Fortpflanzungsmedizin. In: Runnebaum B, Rabe T (eds) Fortpflanzungsmedizin. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 29Google Scholar
  28. Scott JZ, Nakamura RM, Mutch J, Davajan V (1977) The cervical factor in fertility: diagnosis and treatment. Fertil Steril 28:12Google Scholar
  29. Semm K (1967) A new instrument for artifical insemination. Excerpta Medica, New York p 593 (International Congress Series, vol 33)Google Scholar
  30. Sims JM (1968) Illustrations of the value of the microscope in the treatment of the sterile condition. Br Med J II:465Google Scholar
  31. Tresway D (1976) Interpretations and significance of the fractional postcoital test. Am J Obstet Gynec 124:352Google Scholar
  32. van der Veen H, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K (1990) Neue Aspekte der Inseminationsbehandlung. In: Diedrich K (ed) Neue Wege in der Diagnostik und Therapie der Sterilitát. Bücherei des Frauenarztes, vol 25. Enke, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  33. Whitelaw MJ (1950) Use of the cervical cap to increase fertility in cases of oligospermy. Fertil Steril 1:33Google Scholar
  34. World Health Organisation (1992) WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction, 3rd edn. Cambridge University, Press Syndicate, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. H. Broer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations