Skip to main content

Multi-Airport Ground Holding Problem: A Heuristic Approach Based on Priority Rules

  • Conference paper
Modelling and Simulation in Air Traffic Management

Part of the book series: Transportation Analysis ((TRANSANALY))

Abstract

In recent years, many sophisticated mathematical models have been proposed to address the problem of reducing congestion at major airports by means of Ground Holding (GH) Policies, i.e., by imposing a ground delay to selected aircraft in order to reduce and possibly to avoid airborne delays and congestion. These models, which are usually optimization models, have found little application in practice so far, probably because they are not easy to understand. In this paper we introduce and analyze a family of simple, easy to understand, heuristics. Each heuristic is based on a specific “priority rule”. The flights are grouped dynamically into a manageable number of classes. Each “priority rule” specifies, for any two flights of different classes, which one has priority over the other. The performances of the proposed heuristics are compared among themselves, and with that of an “optimal” policy, on a set of test problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Andreatta and L. Brunetta. Multi-airport ground holding problem: a computational evaluation of exact algorithms, to appear in Operations Research, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Andreatta and G. Tidona. A new formulation for the multi-airport ground holding problem. Internal Report no. 3/94, Dip. di Matematica Pura e Applicata, University di Padova, Italy, March 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Brunetta, G. Guastalla and L. Navazio. A new approach for solving the multi-airport ground holding problem. Internal Report no. 25/95, Dip. di Matematica Pura e Applicata, University di Padova, Italy, September 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.R. Odoni. The flow management problem in air traffic control, in A.R. Odoni, L. Bianco and G. Szego eds., Flow control of congested networks, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.B. Vranas. The multi-airport ground holding problem in air traffic control, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Ocean Engineering and Operations Research Center, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P.B. Vranas, D.J. Bertsimas and A.R. Odoni. The multi-airport ground holding problem in air traffic control. Operations Research, 42:249–261, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andreatta, G., Brunetta, L., Guastalla, G. (1997). Multi-Airport Ground Holding Problem: A Heuristic Approach Based on Priority Rules. In: Bianco, L., Dell’Olmo, P., Odoni, A.R. (eds) Modelling and Simulation in Air Traffic Management. Transportation Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60836-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60836-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64576-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60836-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics