Skip to main content

Host Relationships at Reversed Generation Times: Margaritifera (Bivalvia) and Salmonids

  • Chapter
Vertical Food Web Interactions

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 130))

Abstract

Generation time is supposed to be an important factor for the evolution of host-parasite relationships. The shorter an organism’s generation time, the faster its potential rate of evolution. Thus, short-lived hosts (the generation time is equal to or only slightly longer than that of the parasite) can be thought as being involved in an arms race where new host defences select for new parasite offences and vice versa. On the other hand, long-lived hosts are unlikely to match the faster evolving attack possibilities of parasites. Therefore the evolution of “covenants” may account for the continued persistence of such host-parasite systems (Freeland 1986).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arey LB (1932) The formation and structure of the glochidial cyst. Biol Bull 53: 217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Awakura T (1968) The ecology of parasitic glochidia of the freshwater pearl musselMargaritifera laevis. Sci Rep Hokkaido Fish Hatchery 23: 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer JG (1951) The ecology of animal parasites. Univ Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaresku (1992) Distribution and dispersal of freshwater animals in North America and Eurasia. Aula, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1987a) Reproductive strategy of the freshwater pearl mussel. J Anim Ecol 56: 691–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1987b) The parasitic stage of the freshwater pearl mussel. II. Susceptibility of brown trout. Arch Hydrobiol 76: 393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1987c) The parasitic stage of the freshwater pearl mussel. III. Host relationships. Arch Hydrobiol 76: 413–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1988) Threats to the freshwater pearl mussel in central Europe. Biol Conserv 45: 239–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1992) Variation in the life span and size of the freshwater pearl mussel. J Anim Ecol 61: 425–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1994) The adaptive value of offspring size among freshwater mussels (Bivalvia; Unionoidea). J Anim Ecol 63: 933–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G, Vogel C (1987) The parasitic stage of the freshwater pearl mussel. I. Host response to glochidiosis. Arch Hydrobiol 76: 393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G, Hochwald S, Silkenat W (1992) Spatial distribution of freshwater mussels. The role of host fish and metabolic rate. Freshwater Biol 26: 377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behuke RJ (1972) The systematics of salmonid fishes of recently glaciated lakes. J Fish Res Board Can 29: 639–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berven KA, Gill DE (1983) Interpreting geographic variation in life history traits. Am Zool 23: 85–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Beverton RJH, Holt SJ (1959) A review of the life spans and mortality rates of fish in nature, and their relation to growth and other physiological characteristics. CIBA Found Colloq Ageing 5: 142–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Buddensiek V (1991) Untersuchungen zu den Aufwuchsbedingungen der FlußperlmuschelMargaritifera margaritiferain ihrer früher postparasitären Phase. PhD Thesis, Tierärztliche Hochschule, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney HCG, Oliver PG, Davis GM (1993)Margaritifera durrovensis: taxonomie status, ecology and conservation. J Conchol Lond 34:267–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke AH (1981) The freshwater molluscs of the Canadian Interior Basin. Malacologia 13: 1–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort A (1957) The duration of life in molluscs. Proc Malacol Soc Lond 32: 219–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunjak RA, McGladdery SE (1990) The parsite-host relationship of glochidia on the gills of young-of-the-year Atlantic salmon. Can J Zool 69: 353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeland B (1986) Arms races and covenants: the evolution of parasite communities. In: Kikkawa J, Anderson DJ (eds) Community ecology: pattern and process. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 289–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost WE, Brown ME (1967) The trout. The New Naturalist. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fustish CA, Millemann RE (1978) Glochidiosis of salmonid fishes II. J Parasitol 64: 155–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grundelius E (1987) Flodpaerlmusslans Tillbakagang i Dalarna. Information fran Soetvattenslaboratoriet Drottningholm 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hänfling B (1993) Wanderverhalten, Wachstumsparameter und Mortalität der BachforelleSalmo trutta. Ms Thesis, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms W (1907) Zur Biologie und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Flußperlmuschel. Zool Anz 31: 814–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1979) An introduction to population ecology. Yale University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermy T (1984) Evolution of insect/host plant relationships. Am Nat 124: 609–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karna DW, Millemann RE (1978) Glochidiosis of salmonid fishes III. J Parasitol 63: 728–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Kat PW (1984) Parasitism and the Unionacea. J Parasitol 59: 189–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers TR, Millemann RE (1977) Glochidiosis of Salmonid fishes I. Comparative susceptibility to experimental infection withMargaritifera margaritifera. J Parasitol 63: 728–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers TR, Millemann RE, Fustish CA (1980) Glochidiosis of Salmonid fishes IV. Humoral and tissue response of Coho and Chinook salmon to experimental infection withMargaritifera margaritifera. J Parasitol 66: 274–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy G (1942) Relationship of the freshwater pearl mussel to trout in the Truckee River. Calif Fish Game 28: 89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeve F (1958) The origin and speciation ofOncorhynchus. Trans R Soc Can 52: 25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves RJ, Weaver LR, Zale AV (1985) An evaluation of host fish suitability for glochidia ofVillosa vanuxemiandV. nebulosa. Am Midi Nat 113: 13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott WB, Crossman EJ (1973) Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DG (1976) Notes on the biology ofMargaritifera margaritiferain central Massachusetts. Am Midi Nat 1: 252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DG (1978) Biannual gametogenesis inMargaritifera margaritiferain northeastern North America. Bull Am Malacol Union Inc: 49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DG (1980) Anatomical studies onMargaritifera margaritiferaandCumberlandia monodonta. Zool J Linn Soc 69: 257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith G, Stearley R (1989) The classification and scientific names of rainbow and cutthroat trout. Fisheries 14: 4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Gill SJ (1983) Developmental plasticity: developmental conversion versus phenotypic modulation. Am Zool 23: 47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1977) The evolution of life history traits; a critique of the theory and a review of the data. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8: 145–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surber T (1912) Identification of the glochidia of freshwater mussels. Bur Fish Doc 771: 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DW, Uyeno T (1966) Evolution of host specificity of freshwater salmonid fishes and mussels in the north Pacific region. Venus 24: 199–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Utermark W (1973) Untersuchungen über die Wirtsfischfrage für die Glochidien der Flußperlmushel. MS Thesis. Tierärztliche Hochschule, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Young M, Williams J (1984a) The reproductive biology of the pearl mussel in Scotland. I. Field

    Google Scholar 

  • studies. Arch Hydrobiol 99:405-422 Young M, Williams J (1984b) The reproductive biology of the freshwater pearl mussel in Scotland. II. Laboratory studies. Arch Hydrobiol 100:29-43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziuganov V, Zotin A, Nezlin L, Tretiakov V (1994) The freshwater pearl mussels and their relationships with salmonid fish. Vniro Publishing House, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bauer, G. (1997). Host Relationships at Reversed Generation Times: Margaritifera (Bivalvia) and Salmonids. In: Dettner, K., Bauer, G., Völkl, W. (eds) Vertical Food Web Interactions. Ecological Studies, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60725-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60725-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64528-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60725-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics