The Utrecht Workshop on Welfare Aspects of Transgenic Animals

General Discussion
  • T. Poole
Conference paper


The main points raised in the discussion will be briefly outlined. Firstly, some delegates asserted that there is no real difference between transgenics and genetical changes achieved through traditional selective breeding. The opponents of this view argued that the changes brought about by transgenics are less predictable, much more rapid and in some cases much more debilitating. The point was made that genes from different species may have been separated for millions of years and that their insertion into the genome could result in a serious upset to the “genetic integrity” of the species. The concept of genetic integrity was debated with some delegates supporting such a notion and others denying its existence. The main arguments against genetic integrity are that, in the course of evolution, genetical differences between species or sub-species are often non-adaptive, having arisen through physical separation of sections of an originally single population and that in some instances hybrids may even be at an advantage. Furthermore transgenesis by means of viral vectors is a naturally occurring phenomenon.


Transgenic Animal Neutral Point Physical Separation Genetic Integrity Pain Coping 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Poole

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations