Skip to main content
Book cover

NMR pp 51–76Cite as

Coherence Transfer of J-Coupled Spins

  • Chapter
  • 1072 Accesses

Abstract

The influence of indirect spin-spin interaction (briefly J coupling) on the evolution of spin coherences becomes appreciable if the much stronger dipolar or quadrupolar interactions are largely averaged out by molecular motions. This is the realm of high-resolution NMR which applies to low-viscous isotropic liquids in particular. Similar conditions can also be produced in solids by experimental averaging procedures such as magic-angle spinning or multi-pulse line narrowing [336]. As outlined before, echoes are understood as coherence dephasing/rephasing phenomena. Therefore any interaction and any measure influencing the coherence evolution and the coherence pathways affect the formation of spin echoes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The rules for the interpretation of the spin-operator terms are summarized in Table 51.1 on page 482.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The terminology and symbols for the time intervals normally used in context with three-pulse two-dimensional spectroscopy are partially different from those common with ordinary spin-echo experiments. The 2D nomenclature corresponds to that used in the three-pulse schemes Fig. 7.3, for instance.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A treatment of a similar three-pulse sequence serving volume-selective spectral editing of an A3X spin system can be found in Sect. 37.1.2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The subscript in parentheses indicates that we are now dealing with converted coherences. In the present case, σ(lm) means single-quantum coherences which can be traced back to longitudinal magnetization in the previous interval.

    Google Scholar 

  5. This also implies that no “exchange” takes place (compare Sect. 23.2).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See footnote 4 on page 63.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The operator terms can equivalently be represented by the single-transition expressions given by Eqs. 42.76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. This is the reason why zero-quantum coherences cannot be spoiled by external field gradients.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Compare footnote 4 on page 63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Compare footnote 8 on page 34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The operator terms standing for double-quantum coherences can also be expressed by the single-transition operators given by Eqs. 42.77.

    Google Scholar 

  12. According to the theory outlined above, double-quantum coherences as well as any other order of non-single-quantum coherences should not occur if spin-spin and dipolar couplings do not affect the evolution of spin-1/2 coherences. In the present case, where complete motional averaging is assumed, this is readily demonstrated by setting J = 0 in Eq. 7.45. However, long-range intermolecular dipolar interactions fluctuate more slowly than short-range and intramolecular couplings. Motional averaging may therefore be incomplete for long distances r. Multiple-quantam coherences might arise on these grounds [505]. Remember that dipolar interaction varies proportional to r-3, whereas the number of coupling partners increases proportional to r2. Also, one should keep in mind that radiation damping and the demagnetizing field can cause striking effects which mimic the coherence-transfer features of J coupled spin systems under motional averaging conditions [64, 65]. Radiation damping is the result of the feedback action of the currents induced in the probe RF coil by the precessing magnetization [66]. The demagnetizing field is caused by the magnetization of the sample as described in Sect. 2.4. The line shifts caused by this field are appreciable in high-resolution NMR at the strong flux densities of modern spectrometers. The demagnetizing field follows the magnetization in the course of a pulse sequence, and, hence, a feedback effect on the evolution occurs [59].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kimmich, R. (1997). Coherence Transfer of J-Coupled Spins. In: NMR. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60582-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60582-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64465-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60582-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics