Skip to main content

Telecommunications Reform in the United States: Promises and Pitfalls

  • Chapter
Book cover Telecommunications and Energy in Systemic Transformation

Abstract

The United States Congress recently enacted sweeping legislation to overhaul the rules governing competition in telecommunications services. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (see CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, 1996) is the first major rewrite of the Communications Act of 1934. It also supersedes the 1982 antitrust consent decree that broke up AT&T and barred the seven new regional Bell operating companies (“Bells”) from manufacturing equipment and offering long-distance service.

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the seminar on “Energy and Telecoms Regulation in Transition Countries,” The Center for Economic Development, Bratislava, Slovakia, October 1995. The views in this paper do not purport to represent those of any United States government agency. I have learned a lot from discussions with Tim Brennan, Gerald Brock, Richard Clarke, Bill Corbett, Robert Crandall, Tom Hazlett, Evan Kwerel, Roger Noll, George Slover, Lisa Sockett, Joe Stiglitz, Jean Tirole, Scott Wallsten, Leonard Waverman, John Windhausen, Peyton Wynns and many others. I wish I could blame them for any errors, but unfortunately must take full responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BRENNAN, T.J. (1987), “Why Regulated Firms Should Be Kept Out of Unregulated Markets: Understanding the Divestiture in U.S. v. AT&T,” Antitrust Bulletin vol. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRENNAN, T.J. (1995), “Is the Theory Behind U.S. v. AT&T Applicable Today?” forthcoming, Antitrust Bulletin vol. 40, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROCK, G.W. (1994), Telecommunication Policy for the Information Age: From Monopoly to Competition, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, S.J. and D.S. SIBLEY (1994), The Theory of Public Utility Pricing, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauley, L. (1995), “Calls Waiting: Rivals Are Hung Up On Baby Bells’ Control Over Local Markets,” The Wall Street Journal, Tuesday, October 24, 1995, Al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Quarterly (1995), “The Fine Print: A Side-by-Side Comparison of the House and Senate Telecommunications Bills,” Special Report, September 23, 1995, vol. 53, Supplement to No. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD (1996), “Conference Report on S. 652, Telecommunications Act of 1996,” and “Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference,” vol. 142, January 1996, H1078-H1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRAMTON, P.C. (1995), “The PCS Spectrum Auctions: An Early Assessment,” mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRANDALL, R. and L. WAVERMAN (1995), Talk Is Cheap: The Promise of Regulatory_Reform in North American Telecommunications. The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Report Of The President, February 1996, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • GORE, A. (1995), “Remarks Delivered by Vice President Gore to the Networked Economy Conference,” Washington DC, September 12, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • KWEREL, E.R., and J.R. WILLIAMS (1993), “Moving toward a Market for Spectrum,” Regulation: Cato Review of Business & Government, 1993 No. 2, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAFFONT, J.-J., and J. TIROLE (1993), A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J. and J. Tirole (1996), “Creating Competition Through Interconnection: Theory and Practice,” manuscript, Institut d’Economie Industrielle, Toulouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEWIS, W. (1995), “Telecoms Regulator to Face Public,” Financial Times Weekend, November 18/19, 1995, page 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEARL, D. (1995), “Good Connections: Despite Deregulation, Rural Phone Subsidies Are Likely to Survive,” The Wall Street Journal, Thursday, November 30, 1995, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, M. (1986a), “The Nature and Scope of Contestability Theory,” Oxford Economic Papers vol. 38 Supplement, November 1986, 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHWARTZ, M. (1986b), “The Perverse Effects of the Robinson-Patman Act,” Antitrust Bulletin vol. 31, no. 3, Fall 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 524 Federal Supplement 1336 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwartz, M. (1997). Telecommunications Reform in the United States: Promises and Pitfalls. In: Welfens, P.J.J., Yarrow, G. (eds) Telecommunications and Energy in Systemic Transformation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60519-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60519-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64441-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60519-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics