Skip to main content

Limitations of Existing Systems of Staging for Rectal Cancer: The Forgotten Margin

  • Chapter
Rectal Cancer Surgery

Abstract

Good staging is central to the logical management of patients with rectal cancer since the choice of future treatment is frequently based upon the stage of the tumour. Before one can describe the limitations of existing staging systems, the best method must be considered. The ideal staging system would be clinicopathological, however, there are two disadvantages of such methods. Firstly, clinical impressions can be inaccurate with false-positive and negative diagnoses, e.g. radiological imaging of metastases, surgeon’s impression of adequacy of resection, and secondly, communication and cooperation must be high between the surgeon and his specialist pathologist, which may not always be the case. With improved imaging, more specialisation of both surgeons and pathologists, and the realisation of the importance of the close relationship between the pathologist and surgeon, it should be possible to move towards a clinicopathological system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D, Dixon MF, Quirke P (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344: 707 – 711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arbman G, Nilsson E, Hallböök O, Sjödahl R (1996) Can total mesorectal excision reduce the local recurrence rate in rectal cancer surgery? Br J Surg 83: 375 – 379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Astler VB, Coller FA (1954) The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 139: 846 – 852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beahrs OH, Myers MD (1983) American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for staging cancer, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blenkinsopp WK, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G, Fielding LP (1981) Histopathology reporting in large bowel cancer. J Clin Pathol 34: 598 – 613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cawthorne SJ, Gibbs NM, Marks CG (1986) Clearance techniques for the detection of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 73: 58 – 60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan KW, Boey J, Wong SKC (1985) A method of reporting radial invasion and surgical clearance of rectal carcinoma. Histopathology 9: 1319 – 1327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chapuis PH, Fisher R, Dent OF, Newland RC, Pheils MT (1985) The relationship between different staging methods and survival in colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 28: 158 – 161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Fisher R,Newland RC, Pheils MT, Smyth E, Colquhoun K (1985) A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer. Br J Surg 72: 698 – 702

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Newland RC, Bokey EL, Pheils MT (1986) An evaluation of the American Joint Committee pTNM staging method for cancer of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 29: 6 – 10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis NC, Newland RC (1982) The reporting of colorectal cancer. The Australian clinico-pathological staging system. Aust NZ J Surg 53: 211 – 221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis NC, Newland RC (1983) Terminology and classification of colorectal adenocarcinoma: The Australian Clinico-pathological Staging System. Aust NZ J Surg 53: 211 – 221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Denoix PF (1954) French Ministry of Public Health. National Institute of Hygiene Monograph No. 4, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Haas-Kock D, Baeten C, Jager J, Langendijk J, Schouten L, Arends J (1995) The prognostic significance of the lateral resection margin in rectal cancer. Proceedings of the conference “Colorectal Cancer: From Gene to Cure”, Amsterdam, December 1995. Abstract P43

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dukes CE (1932) The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol Bacteriol 35: 323 – 332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dukes CE, Bussey HJR (1958) The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis. Br J Cancer 12: 309 – 320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabriel WB, Dukes CE, Bussey HJR (1935) Lymphatic spread in cancer of the rectum. Br J Surgery 23: 395 – 413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heald RJ, Karanjia ND (1992) Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer. World J Surg 16: 848 – 857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hermanek P (1986) Problems of pTNM classification of carcinoma of the stomach, col-orectum and anal margin. Pathol Res Pract 181: 296 – 300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hermanek P, Giedl J, Dworak O (1989) Two programmes for examination of regional lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma with regard to the new pN classification. Path Res Pract 185: 867 – 873

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hermanek P, Wittekind C (1994) The pathologist and the residual tumour (R) classification. Path Res Pract 190: 115 – 123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hermanek P (1995) Interdepartmental variability in long time survival for surgical therapy for colonic cancer - results of the German Study Group for Colorectal Carcinoma (SGCRC). Proceedings of the conference “Colorectal Cancer: From Gene to Cure”, Amsterdam, December 1995. Abstract P40

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hermanek P, Wiebelt H, Staimmer D, Riedl S (1995) Prognostic factors of rectum carcinoma - experience of the German Multicentre Study SGCRC. Tumori 81: 60 – 64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jass JR, Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Bussey HJR, Morson BC, Northover JMA, Todd IP (1986) The grading of rectal cancer: historical perspectives and a multivariate analysis of 447 cases. Histopathology 10: 437 – 459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jass LR, Love SB, Northover JMA (1987) A new classification of rectal cancer. Lancet 1: 1303 – 1306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirklin JW, Dockerty MB, Waugh JM (1949) The role of the peritoneal reflection in the prognosis of carcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 88: 326 – 331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McArdle CS, Hole D (1991) Impact of variability among surgeons on post-operative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. Br Med J 302: 1501 – 1505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341: 457 – 460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nathanson SD, Schultz L, Tilley B, Kambouris A (1986) Carcinomas of the colon and rectum. A comparison of staging classifications. Am Surg 52: 429 – 433

    Google Scholar 

  30. Newland RC, Chapuis PH, Smyth EJ (1987) The prognostic value of substaging colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study of 1117 cases with standardised pathology. Cancer 60: 852 – 857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ng IOL, Luk ISC, Yuen ST, Lau PWK, Pritchett CJ, Ng M, Poon GP, Ho J (1993) Surgical lateral clearance in resected rectal carcinomas. A multivariate analysis of clin-icopathological features. Cancer 71: 1972 – 1976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) The prediction of local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 11: 996 – 999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Quirke P, Dixon MF (1988) How I do it: the prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorect Dis 3: 127 – 131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Quirke P, Scott N (1992) The pathologist’s role in the assessment of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1: 1 – 17

    Google Scholar 

  35. Scott N, Jackson P, Al-Jaberi T, Dixon MF, Quirke P, Finan PJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision and local recurrence: a study of tumour spread in the mesorectum distal to rectal cancer. Br J Surg 82: 1031 – 1033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shepherd NA, Baxter KJ, Love SB (1995) Influence of local peritoneal involvement on pelvic recurrence and prognosis in rectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 48: 849 – 855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Turnbull RB, Kyle K, Watson FR, Spratt J (1967) Cancer of the colon: the influence of the no touch isolation technique on survival rates. Ann Surg 166: 420 – 427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. UICC (1993) TNM supplement. A commentary on uniform use. Hermanek P, Henson DE, Hunter RVP, Sobin L (eds) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. United Kingdom Coordinating Committee for Cancer Research Colorectal Cancer Subcommittee (1987) Handbook for the clinicopathological assessment of colorectal cancer. Medical Research Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wood DA, Robins GF, Zipin C, Lum D, Stearns M (1979) Staging of cancer of the colon and cancer of the rectum. Cancer 43: 961 – 968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Quirke, P. (1997). Limitations of Existing Systems of Staging for Rectal Cancer: The Forgotten Margin. In: Søreide, O., Norstein, J. (eds) Rectal Cancer Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60514-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60514-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61566-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60514-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics