Skip to main content

Role of Sutures and Suturing in the Formation of Postoperative Peritoneal Adhesions

  • Conference paper
Peritoneal Adhesions
  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

Peritoneal adhesions are abnormal fibrous connections between adjacent peritoneal surfaces. They are the commonest cause of small intestinal obstruction in developed countries [31, 45], a prominent reason for female infertility and a troublesome cause of abdominal or pelvic pain. When encountered by the surgeon, peritoneal adhesions make abdominal operations more difficult, hazardous and time-consuming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous (1987) Leading article. Lancet 1: 727

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bowman MC, Cooke ID (1994) The efficacy of synthetic adhesion barriers in infertility surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101: 3–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartolo DCC (1994) The rectum and anal canal. In: Keen G, Farndon JR (eds) Operative surgery and management, 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, p 249

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buckman RF, Woods M, Sargent L, Gervin AS (1976) A unifying pathogenetic mechanism in the aetiology of intraperitoneal adhesions. J Surg Res 20: 1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Conolly WB, Stephens FO (1968) Factors influencing the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions: an experimental study. Surgery 63: 976–979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. von Dembowski T (1888) Ueber die Ursachen der peritonealen Adhäsionen nach chirurgischen Eingriffen mit Rücksicht auf die Frage des Ileus nach Laparotomien. Arch Klin Chir 37: 745–748

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis H (1962) The aetiology of post-operative abdominal adhesions. An experimental study. Br J Surg 50: 10–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis H, Harrison W, Hugh TB (1965) The healing of peritoneum under normal and pathological conditions. Br J Surg 52: 471–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis H, Heddle R (1977) Does the peritoneum need to be closed at laparotomy? Br J Surg 64: 733–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert JM, Ellis H, Foweraker S (1987) Peritoneal closure after lateral paramedian incision. Br J Surg 74: 113–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Glucksman DL (1966) Serosal integrity and intestinal adhesions. Surgery 60: 1009–1011

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van Goor H, de Graaf JS, Grond J, Sluiter WJ, van der Meer J, Bom VI, Bleichrodt RP (1994) Fibrinolytic activity in the abdominal cavity of rats with faecal peritonitis. Br J Surg 81: 1046–1049

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hawley PR, Thomson JPS (1987) Colonic surgery. In: Kirk RM, Williamson RCN (eds) General surgical operations, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p 143

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hertzler AE (1919) The peritoneum. CV Mosby, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hubbard TB, Khan MZ, Carag VR, Albites VE, Hricko GM (1967) The pathology of peritoneal repair: its relation to the formation of adhesions. Ann Surg 165: 908–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hugh TB, Nankivell C, Meagher AP, Li B (1990) Is closure of the peritoneal layer necessary in the repair of midline surgical abdominal wounds? World J Surg 14: 231–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Interceed (TC7) Adhesion Barrier Study Group (1989) Prevention of postsurgical adhesions by INTERCEED (TC7), an absorbable adhesion barrier: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Fertil Steril 51: 933–938

    Google Scholar 

  18. Irvin TT, Golligher JC (1975) A controlled clinical trial of three different methods of perineal wound management following excision of the rectum. Br J Surg 62: 287–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kapur BM, Daneswar A, Chopra P (1979) Evaluation of peritoneal closure at laparotomy. Am J Surg 137: 650–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kyzer S, Bayer I, Turani H, Chaimoff C (1986) The influence of peritoneal closure on formation of intraperitoneal adhesions: an experimental study. Int J Tissue React 8: 355–359

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Laufer N, Merino M, Trietsch HG, DeCherney AH (1984) Macroscopic and histological reactions to polydioxanone, a new synthetic monofilament microsuture. J Reprod Med 29: 307–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Laufman H, Method H (1948) Effect of absorbable foreign substances on bowel anastomoses. Surg Gynecol Obstet 86: 669–673

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Menzies D, Ellis H (1989) Intra-abdominal adhesions and their prevention by topical tissue plasminogen activator. J R Soc Med 82: 534–535

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Menzies D, Ellis H (1990) Intestinal obstruction from adhesions - how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72: 60–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meyer WR, Grainger DA, DeCherney AH, Lachs MS, Diamond MP (1991) Ovarian surgery on the rabbit. Effect of cortex closure on adhesion formation and ovarian function. J Reprod Med 36: 639–643

    Google Scholar 

  26. Milligan DW, Raftery AT (1974) Observations on the pathogenesis of peritoneal adhesions: a light and electron microscopical study. Br J Surg 61: 274–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McLachlin AD, Olssen LS, Pitt DF (1976) Anterior anastomosis of the rectosigmoid: an experimental study. Surgery 80: 306–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Neff MR, Holtz GL, Betsill WL (1985) Adhesion formation and histologic reaction with polydioxanone and polyglactin suture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151: 20–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. O’ Leary DP (1984) Studies on the development of peritoneal adhesions. BSc dissertation, National University of Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  30. O’ Leary DP, Coakley JB (1992) The influence of suturing and sepsis on the development of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74: 134–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Raf LE (1969) Causes of small intestinal obstruction; a study covering the Stockholm area. Acta Chir Scand 135: 67–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Raftery AT (1973a) Regeneration of parietal and visceral peritoneum. Br J Surg 60: 293–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Raftery AT (1973b) Regeneration of parietal and visceral peritoneum: an electron microscopic study. J Anat 115: 375–392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Raftery AT (1981) Effect of peritoneal trauma on peritoneal fibrinolytic activity and intraperitoneal adhesion formation: an experimental study in the rat. Eur Surg Res 13: 397–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Robbins GF, Brunschwig A, Foote FW (1949) Deperitonealization; clinical and experimental observations. Ann Surg 130: 466–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rotstein OD (1992) Role of fibrin deposition in the pathogenesis of intraabdominal infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 11: 1064–1068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ryan GB, Grobety J, Majno G (1971) Postoperative peritoneal adhesions: a study of the mechanisms. Am J Pathol 65: 117–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Saxen L, Myllarniemi H (1968) Foreign materials and postoperative adhesions. N Engl J Med 279: 200–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schwartz LB, Diamond MP (1993) Prevention of adhesion reformation. In: Sutton C, Diamond M (eds) Endoscopic surgery for gynecologists. Saunders, London, p 246

    Google Scholar 

  40. Scott-Coombes DM, Vipond MN, Thompson JN (1993) General surgeons’ attitudes to the treatment and prevention of abdominal adhesions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75: 123–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Singleton AO, Rowe EB, Moore RM (1952) Failure of reperitonealization to prevent abdominal adhesions in the dog. Am J Surg 18: 789–792

    Google Scholar 

  42. Smith JG (1895) Is the apposition of peritoneum to peritoneum a surgical error? Br Med J 1: 1–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Snoj M, Ar’ Rajab A, Ahren B, Bengmark S (1992) Effect of phosphatidylcholine on postoperative adhesions after small bowel anastomosis in the rat. Br J Surg 79: 427–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Snoj M (1993) Intra-abdominal adhesion formation is initiated by phospholipase A2. Med Hypotheses 41: 525–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Stewardson RH, Bombeck CT, Nyhus LM (1978) Critical operative management of small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 187: 189–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Surgical Membrane Study Group (1992) Prophylaxis of pelvic sidewall adhesions with Gore-Tex surgical membrane: a multicenter clinical investigation. Fertil Steril 57: 921–923

    Google Scholar 

  47. Thomas JW, Rhoads JE (1950) Adhesions resulting from removal of serosa from an area of bowel; failure of oversewing to lower incidence in the rat and guinea pig. Arch Surg 61: 565–576

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Thompson JN, Paterson-Brown S, Harbourne T, Whawell SA, Kalodiki E, Dudley HA (1989) Reduced human peritoneal plasminogen activating activity: a possible mechanism for adhesion formation. Br J Surg 76: 382–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Trimpe HD, Bacon HE (1952) Clinical and experimental study of denuded surfaces in extensive surgery of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg 34: 596–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tulandi T, Hum HS, Gelfand MM (1988) Closure of laparotomy incisions with or without peritoneal suturing and second-look laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158: 636–637

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ulfelder H, Quinby WC (1951) Small bowel obstruction following combined abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Surgery 30: 174–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Vipond MN, Whawell SA, Thompson JN, Dudley HA (1994) Effect of experimental peritonitis and ischaemia on peritoneal fibrinolytic activity. Eur J Surg 160: 471–477

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Williams NS (1993) Surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma. In: Keighley MRB, Williams NS (eds) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Saunders, London, pp 1004–1005

    Google Scholar 

  54. di Zerega GS (1994) Contemporary adhesion prevention. Fertil Steril 61: 219–235

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zollinger RM, Zollinger RM (1988) Atlas of surgical operations, 6th edn. Macmillan, New York, p 150

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

O’Leary, D.P. (1997). Role of Sutures and Suturing in the Formation of Postoperative Peritoneal Adhesions. In: Treutner, KH., Schumpelick, V. (eds) Peritoneal Adhesions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60433-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60433-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61192-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60433-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics