Skip to main content

Organizational Change and Assembly Automation in the Dutch Automotive Industry

  • Chapter
Book cover Transforming Automobile Assembly

Abstract

In the Netherlands, discussions about the limitations of traditional production concepts as well as the practical development of new production systems have been strongly influenced by the Dutch version of sociotechnical systems design (STSD). Japanese management concepts such as Lean Production (LP) tend to be compared with sociotechnical principles rather than with traditional Taylorist models as is the case in much of the international literature. This raises many questions. How do LP and Dutch STSD compare? Are they at odds, or might a combination of both be fruitful? What is the impact of these organization concepts on organizational design in practice?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson E (1996) Management Fashion. Academy of Management Review Vol 21 No 1: 254–285.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aertsen F, Benders J (1993) Tricks or Trucks; Ten Years of Organizational Renewal at DAF? Research Memorandum 627, Faculty of Economics, Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bell J H J (1990) Profiteren van de profits? Unpublished Master’s thesis, Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benders J (1993) Optional Options: Work Design and Manufacturing Automation. Avebury, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benders J (1996) Leaving Lean? Recent Changes in the Production Organization of some Japanese Car Plants. Economic and Industrial Democracy Vol 17 No 1: 9–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benders J, Bijsterveld M van (1995) Leaning on Lean; The Processing of a Management Fad. Unpublished paper, Nijmegen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berggren C (1993) The Volvo Experience; Alternatives to Lean Production in the Swedish Auto Industry. Macmillan, BasingstokeVLondon.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berggren C (1995) Japan as Number Two: Competitive Problems and the Future of Alliance Capitalism after the Burst of the Bubble Boom. Work, Employment & Society Vol 9 No 1: 53–95.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bijsterveld M van, Huijgen F (1995) Modern Sociotechnology: Exploring the Frontiers, in: Benders J, de Haan J, Bennett D (eds) The Symbiosis of Work and Technology. London\Bristol PA, Taylor and Francis: 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boom H van den (1992) Keuzeproces carriers bij eindmontage Volvo BV. in: Frambach R T, Nijssen E J (eds) Technologie en Strategisch Management. LEMMA, Utrecht: 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conti R F, Warner M (1993) Taylorism, new technology and just-in-time systems in Japa-nese manufacturing. New Technology, Work, and Employment Vol 8 No 1: 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dankbaar B, Diepen B van (1990) Vernieuwing en herstrukturering bij Volvo Car BV. MERIT, Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dankbaar B, Diepen B van (1991) Voordat Mitsubishi kwam… Vernieuwing en herstructur-ering bij Volvo Car BV. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken Vol 7 No 3: 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Delbridge R, Turnbull P, Wilkinson B (1992) Pushing back the frontiers: management control and work intensification under JIT/TQM factory regimes. New Technology, Work and Employment Vol 7 No 2: 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eijnatten F van (1993) The Paradigm that Changed the Work Place. Assen\Stockholm, van Gorcum\Arbetslivscentrum.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Engström T, Medbo L (1994) Intra-Group Work Patterns in Final Assembly of Motor Vehicles. International Journal of Operations and Production Management Vol 14 No 1: 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujimoto T (1994) Reinterpreting the Resource-Capability View of the Firm: A Case of the Development-Production System of the Japanese Auto Makers. Discussion paper 94-F-20, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fujimoto T (1996) An Evolutionary Process of Toyota’s Final Assembly Operations — The Role of Ex-post Dynamic Capabilities. Discussion paper 96-F-2, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grönning T (1995) Recent developments at Toyota Motor Corporation: The emergence of “Neo-Toyotism”? in: Sandberg Å (ed) Enriching Production; Perspectives on Volvo’s Udde- valla plant as an alternative to lean production, Avebury, Aldershot: 405–425.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huys R, Hootegem G van (1995) Volvo-Gent: a Japanese transplant in Belgium or beyond? in: Sandberg Å (ed) Enriching Production; Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production. Avebury, Aldershot: 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Imai M (1986) KAIZEN — The key to Japan’s competitive success. New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jürgens U (1992) Lean Production in Japan: Mythos und Realität, in: IAT/IGM/IAO/HBS (eds) Lean Production; Schlanke Produktion, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf: 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kieser A (1993) Die “Zweite Revolution in der Autoindustrie” — Eine vergleichende Analyse und ihre Schwächen, in: Meyer-Krahmer F (ed) Innovationsökonomie und Technologiepolitik. Forschungsansätze und politische Konsequenzen, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg: 103–134.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kieser A (1996) Moden & Mythen des Organisierens. Die Betriebswirtschaft Vol 56 No 1: 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krafcik J F (1988) Triumph of the Lean Production System. Sloan Management Review Vol 30 No 1:41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nakamoto M (1995) Partnerships: A Driving Force for Sales Growth. The JAMA Forum Vol 13 No 4: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. NedCar (1994) Personeelsjaarverslag 1993. NedCar, s.l. [Born].

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nederveen Pieterse J (1994) Globalization as Hybridization. International Sociology Vol 9 No 2: 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Niepce W (1994) Lean Production Versus Sociotechnical Systems at NedCar. Unpublished master’s thesis, State University Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ortmann G (1995) Formen der Produktion; Organisation und Rekursivität. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sandberg Å (ed) (1995) Enriching Production; Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production. Avebury, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schramade P (1992) Learning for lean & lean for learning? Opleiding & Ontwikkeling Vol 5 No 7/8: 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sey A-P (1994) Soziale Aspekte in den gegenwärtigen Modifizierungen von Produktionskonzepten in der japanischen Automobilindustrie; Japan auf dem Weg zur “arbeiterfreundlichen Fabrik”? Unpublished Master’s thesis, Free University of Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shimizu K (1995) Humanization of the production system and work at Toyota Motor Co and Toyota Motor Kyushu, in: Sandberg Å (ed) Enriching Production; Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production, Avebury, Aldershot: 383–403.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sitter L U de (1989) Modern Sociotechnology. Internal paper, KOERS, Den Bosch.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Takehara N (1993) NedCar’s Way of Thinking. Proceedings Conference on Lean Manufacturing and Automation, University of Nijmegen, February 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Verlaar A J J M, Buyse J J (1990) Integrale organisatievernieuwing bij DAF; Rol P&O bij veranderingsproject in Motoren Testhal. Human resource management III. 11 -(1–20).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vloet M (1993) Lean Production versus Moderne Sociotechniek; Een vergelijkende studie tussen de arbeidsorganisatie van Lean Production en Moderne Sociotechniek. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Womack, J P, Jones D T, Roos D (1990) The Machine that Changed the World. Rawson Associates, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wood S (1991) Japanization and\or Toyotaism? Work, Employment & Society Vol 5 No 4: 567–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Young S M (1992) A Framework for Successful Adoption and Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Practices in the United States. Academy of Management Review Vol 17 No - 4: 677–700.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benders, J., Dankbaar, B. (1997). Organizational Change and Assembly Automation in the Dutch Automotive Industry. In: Shimokawa, K., Jürgens, U., Fujimoto, T. (eds) Transforming Automobile Assembly. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60374-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60374-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64377-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60374-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics