Advertisement

MR-Guided Cholecystostomy in Pigs

  • J. F. Debatin
  • S. Göhde
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

The MR experiment is highly sensitive to materials characterized by long T2 relaxation times. Bile fluid is such a material. Bile-filled structures can hence be displayed on heavily T2-weighted MR sequences without the use of any contrast medium. Use of very long repetition (TR) and echo times (TE) results in a selective display of the biliary system referred to as MR cholangiography (Kaufmann et al. 1989; Schuster et al. 1995). The MR images are acquired non-invasively in any desired plane, providing a truly three-dimensional perspective of the biliary tree, including any pathologic findings (Kaufmann et al. 1989; Schuster et al. 1995).

Keywords

Biliary System Tracking Signal Bile Fluid Liquid Crystal Display Monitor Percutaneous Biliary Intervention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert K, Schledjewski R, Harbaugh M, Bleser S, Jamison R, Friedrich K (1994) Characterization of wear in composite material orthopedic implants. II. The implant/bone interface. Biomed Mater Eng 4:199–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dumoulin CL, Souza, SP, Darrow RD, Pelc NJ, Adams WJ, Ash SA (1991) Simultaneous acquisition of phase contrast angiograms and stationary tissue images with Hadamard encoding of flow-induced phase shifts. J Magn Reson Imaging 1:399–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Darrow RD (1993) Real-time position monitoring of invasive devices using magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 29:411–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jokish KA, Brown SA, Bauer TW, Merritt K (1992) Biological response to chopped-carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK. J Biomed Mater Res 26:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jolesz FA, Blumenfeld SM (1994) Interventional use of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 10:85–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaufmann L, Arakawa M, Hale J, et al (1989) Accessible magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 5:283–297Google Scholar
  7. Leung DA, Debatin JF, Wildermuth S, et al (1995a) Intravascular MR tracking catheter: preliminary experimental evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1265–1270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Leung DA, Debatin JF, Wildermuth S, et al (1995b) Real-time biplanar tracking for interventional MR- imaging procedures. Radiology 197:485–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Maharaj G, Bleser S, Albert K, Lambert R, Jani S, Jamison R (1994) Characterization of wear in composite material orthopedic implants. I. The composite trunnion/ceramic interface. Biomed Mater Eng 4:193–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schenk JF, Jolesz FA, Roemer PB, et al (1995) Superconducting open configuration MR imaging system for image-guided therapy. Radiology 195:805–814Google Scholar
  11. Schuster DM, Pedrosa MC, Robbins AH (1995) Magnetic resonance cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 20:353–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wildermuth S, Debatin JF, Leung DA, et al. (1995) MR-guided percutaneous intravascular interventions: in vivo assessment of potential applications, (abstract) Proceedings, Society of Magnetic Resonance, p 1161Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Debatin
    • 1
  • S. Göhde
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Diagnostic RadiologyZurich University HospitalZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations