Advertisement

MR-Guided Biopsy of the Abdomen

  • C. Frahm
  • H.-B. Gehl
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

The excellent soft tissue contrast of MRI, its multiplanar imaging capabilities, and detailed delineation of anatomic features gave rise to the concept of MR-guided biopsy. The first attempt to realize this idea was reported by Mueller et al. (1986), who described phantom trials for needle visualization, as well as MR-guided aspiration biopsies of liver masses. Other groups followed with applications in the head and neck, but also in the abdomen, musculoskeletal system, and breast (Lufkin et al. 1987,1988; Lufkin and Layfield 1989; van Sonnenberg et al. 1988; Duckwiler et al. 1989; Pitt et al. 1993; Greenstein Orel et al. 1994). The first specially designed commercially available aspiration biopsy needle was developed and introduced by Lufkin et al. in 1987.

Keywords

Target Lesion Adrenal Mass Sagittal Slice Needle Position Angle Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Duckwiler G, Lufkin RB, Teresi L, Spickler E, Dion J, Vinuela F, Bentson J, Hanafee W (1989) Head and neck lesions: MR-guided aspiration biopsy. Radiology 170:519–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Frahm C, Kloess W, Gehl HB, Weiss HD (1995) Ein neues Laser-Punktionsvisier für CT- und MRT-gesteuerte Punktionen des Körperstamms. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 163:73–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frahm C, Gehl HB, Weiss HD, Rossberg WA (1996) Technik der MRT-gesteuerten Stanzbiopsie im Abdomen an einem offenen Niederfeldgerät: Durchführbarkeit und erste klinische Ergebnisse. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 164:62–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gehl HB, Frahm C, Schimmelpenning H, Weiss HD (1996) Technik der MRT-gesteuerten abdominellen Drainage an einem offenen Niederfeldmagneten: Durchführbarkeit und erste Ergebnisse. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 165:70–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Greenstein Orel S, Schnall MD, Newman RW, Powell CM, Torosian MH, Rosato EF (1994) MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. Radiology 193:97–102Google Scholar
  6. Lee H, Lu DSK, Farahani K, Krasny RM (1996) Biopsies of hepatic dome lesions: semi-real time coronal MR guidance technique, (abstract) Proceedings of the 4th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, New York, p 889Google Scholar
  7. Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Petersilge CA, et al (1996) Interactive MRI for procedure guidance on a clinical c-arm system: A pilot biopsy study, (abstract) Proceedings of the 4th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, New York, p 53Google Scholar
  8. Lufkin R, Lay field L (1989) Coaxial needle system of MR- and CT-guided aspiration cytology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:1105–1107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lufkin R, Teresi L, Hanafee W (1987) New needle for MR-guided aspiration cytology of the head and neck. Am J Roentgenol 149:380–382Google Scholar
  10. Lufkin R, Teresi L, Chiu L, Hanafee W (1988) A technique for MR-guided needle placement. Am J Roentgenol 151:193–196Google Scholar
  11. Mack MG, Vogl TJ, Balzer JO, Hammerstingl R, Pegios W, Lobbeck H, Felix R (1997) MR-guided biopsies of soft tissue tumors on a conventional high-field MR-system. (abstract) Eur Radiol 7 [Suppl]: S188Google Scholar
  12. Mueller PR, Stark DD, Simeone JF, Saini S, Butch RJ, Edelman RR, Wittenberg J, Ferrucci JT (1986) MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 161:605–609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pitt AM, Fleckenstein JL, Greenlee RG, Burns DK, Bryan WW, Haller R (1993) MRI-guided biopsy in inflammatory myopathy: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 11:1093–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schenck JF, Jolesz FA, Roemer PB, et al (1995) Superconducting open-configuration MR imaging system for image-guided therapy. Radiology 195:805–814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Silverman SG, Collick BD, Figueira MR, et al (1995) Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system. Radiology 197:175–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Steiner P, Schoenenberger AW, Penner EA, Erhart P, Debatin JF, von Schulthess GK, Kacl GM (1996) Interaktive stereotaktische Interventionen im supraleitenden, offenen 0,5-Tesla-MR-Tomographen. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 165:276–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. van Sonnenberg E, Wittenberg J, Ferrucci JT, Mueller PR, Simeone JF (1981) Triangulation method for percutaneous needle guidance: the angled approach to upper abdominal masses. Am J Roentgenol 137:757–761Google Scholar
  18. van Sonnenberg E, Hajek P, Gylys-Morin V, et al (1988) A wire-sheath system for MR-guided biopsy and drainage: laboratory studies and experience in 10 patients. Am J Roentgenol 151:815–817Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Frahm
    • 1
  • H.-B. Gehl
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of RadiologyMedical University of LübeckLübeckGermany

Personalised recommendations