Advertisement

External Referencing Systems

  • R. W. Newman
  • E. A. Penner
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

The value of MR, CT or other diagnostic imaging modalities in assisting in surgical procedures has long been recognized. To extend the clinical utility of these images, stereotactic frames were introduced to allow the spatial information from the computer-based “image space” to be translated back into patient-based “physical space”, allowing for increased precision in the planning of interventional procedures. Several computer workstation systems are in clinical use for common stereotactic procedures, such as brain biopsies and, the introduction of stents, lasers, or radiotherapy devices into critical areas. The process is rather complex, however, as it is first necessary to attach a set of fiducials to the patient prior to MR/CT imaging (i.e., a mechanical head frame, implanted markers, skin markers, etc.). A complete volume of images is subsequently collected including the fiducials. These are then transferred to a computer for display.

Keywords

Pointer System Error Distance Stereotactic Frame Liquid Crystal Display Monitor Interventional Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Image Guided Technologies (1996) Flashpoint™ Model 5000 3D localizer user’s and programmer’s manual. Image Guided Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
  2. GE Medical Systems (1997) GE Signa SP™ Optional Accessories Operators Manual. GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis.Google Scholar
  3. Moriarty TM, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA, Black PM, Alexander E (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging therapy — intraoperative MR imaging. Neurosurg Clin N Am 7:323–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schenck JF, Jolesz FA, Roemer PB, et al (1995) Superconducting open-configuration MR imaging system for image guided therapy. Radiology 195:805–814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Silverman SG, Collick BD, Figueira MR, Khorasani R, Adams DF, Newman RW, Topulos GP, Jolesz FA (1995) Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system. Radiology 197:175–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Silverman SG (1996) Percutaneous abdominal biopsy: recent advances and future directions. Semin Interv Radiol 13:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sipos EP, Tebo SA, Zinreich SJ, Long DM, Brem H (1996) In-vivo accuracy testing and clinical experience with the ISG viewing wand. Neurosurgery 39:194–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith KR, Frank KJ, Bucholz RD (1994) The Neurostation — a highly accurate, minimally invasive solution to frameless stereotactic neurosurgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph 18:247–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Steiner P, Schoenenberger AW, Penner EA, Erhart P, Debatin JF, von Schulthess GK, Kacl GM (1996) Interaktive, stereotaktische Interventionen im supraleitenden, offenen 0,5-Tesla-MR-Tomographen. Rofo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 165:276–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. W. Newman
    • 1
  • E. A. Penner
    • 2
  1. 1.General Electric CompanyMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.GE Medical SystemsAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations