The Integrated Transport and Evolution Model



The impact of transport infrastructure on regional development has been difficult to verify empirically in Europe (Wegener in WP 7, EUROSIL, 1998). There seems to be a clear positive correlation between transport infrastructure endowment or the location in interregional networks and the levels of economic indicators such as GDP per capita (e.g. Biehl, 1986; 1991; Keeble et al. , 1982, 1988). However, this correlation may merely reflect historical agglomeration processes rather than causal relationships effective today (cf. Brocker and Peschel, 1988). Attempts to explain changes in economic indicators, i.e. economic growth and decline, by transport investment have been much less successful. The reason for this failure may be that in countries with an already highly developed transport infrastructure further transport network improvements bring only marginal benefits. The conclusion is that transport improvements have strong impacts on regional development only where they result in removing a bottleneck (Blum, 1982; Biehl, 1986; 1991). In China the situation is quite different. There is a growing need for an expansion of transport infrastructure on the urban level, the regional and national levels.


Traffic Flow Transport Infrastructure Employment Effect Public Capital Trip Purpose 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of StuttgartInstitute for Theoretical PhysicsStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Steinbeis Transfer Center and University of StuttgartApplied Systems AnalysisStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations