Wood Pretreatment to Remove Toxic Extractives

  • Pratima Bajpai
  • Pramod K. Bajpai
  • Ryuichiro Kondo


Environmental research on the aquatic impacts of pulp mill effluents has been concentrated in Scandinavia and North America. In the 1970s, the regulatory framework covered conventional parameters such as biochemical oxygen demand, suspended solids, and nutrients. From the 1980s until today, concern has been directed towards chemical toxicity. It has been claimed that the organic materials in the effluents from pulp mills cause a number of biological effects. These suspicions have prompted intensive research to study relationships between exposure and effects, as well as profound process changes within the pulp industry. Chemical toxicity analysis has been performed at various levels of biological organization: community, population, individual, organ, tissue, cell, subcellular, and molecular. Many studies performed on pulp mill effluents have focused upon within-organism effects on physiology and biochemistry.1 Despite the profound process changes in the industry, there is still evidence of physiological changes in organisms exposed to mill effluent. However, the ecological significance of these responses is unknown; in large part they are provoked by lipophilic compounds present in the wood entering the mill (extractives) rather than by materials formed or modified during pulping or bleaching.


Wood Chip Free Fatty Acid Content Resin Acid Pulp Mill Resin Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Owens JW: The hazard assessment of pulp and paper effluents in the aquatic environment: a review. Environ Toxicol Chem 1991; 10: 1511–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fengel D, Wegener G: Wood: chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sunito LR, Shiu WY, Mackay D: A review of the nature and properties of chemicals present in pulp mill effleunts. Chemosphere 1988; 17: 1249–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chung LTK, Meier HP, Leach JM: Can pulp mill effluent toxicity be estimated from chemical analyses? Tappi J 1979; 62: 71–74.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rabergh CMI, Isomaa B, Eriksson KE: The resin acids dehydroabietic acid and isopimaric acid inhibit bile acid uptake and perturb potassium transport in isolated hepatocytes from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).Aquat Toxicol 1992; 23: 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pesonen M, Andersson T: Toxic effects of bleached and unbleached paper mill effluents in primary cultures of rainbow trout hepatocytes. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 1992; 24: 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tana J: Sublethal effects of chlorinated phenols and resin acids on rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Water Sci 1988; 2: 77–85.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oikari A, Lonn BE, Castren M, Nakari T, Snickars-Nikinmaa B, Bister H, Virtanen E: Toxicological effects of dehydroabietic acid (DHAA) on the trout, Salmo gairdneriRichardson, in fresh water. Water Res 1983; 17: 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oikari A, Nakari T: Kraft pulp mill effluents cause liver dysfunction in trout. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1982; 28: 266–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Servizi JA, Martens DW, Gordon RW, Kutney JP, Singh M, Dimitriadis E, Hewitt GM, Salisbury PJ, Choi LSL: Microbiological detoxification of resin acids. Water Pollut Res J Can 1986; 21: 119–129.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smook GA: Handbook for pulp and paper technologists. Tappi Press, Atlanta, GA 1989; 7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allen LH: Pitch In wood pulps. Pulp Pap Can 1975; 76(5) 70–77.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Irie Y, Hata K: Enzymatic pitch control in papermaking system. Proceedings of 1990 Papermaking Conference, Atlanta, GA, 1990; 1–10.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujita Y, Awaji H, Taneda H, Matsukura M, Hata K, Shimoto H, Sharyo M, Sakaguchi H, Gibson K: Recent advances in enzymatic pitch control. Tappi J 1992; 74(4) 117–122.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brush TS, Farrell RL, Ho C: Biodegradation of wood extractives from southern yellow pine by Ophiostoma piliferum. Tappi J 1994; 77(1) 155–159.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hata K, Matsukura M, Taneda M, Fujita Y: Mill scale application of enzymatic pitch control during paper production. In: Enzymes in pulp and paper processing. Jeffries TW, Viikari L, eds. ACS Symp Ser 1996; 655: 280–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Farrell RL, Hata K, Wall MB: Solving pitch problems in pulp and paper processes by the use of enzymes or fungi. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 1997; 57: 198–212.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zabel RA, Morrell JJ: Wood microbiology: decay and its prevention. Academic Press, New York 1992; 476.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Breuil C, Iverson S, Yong Gao: Fungal treatment of wood chips to remove extractives. In: Environmentally friendly technologies for the pulp and paper industry. Young RA, Akhtar M, eds. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1998; 541–565.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen T, Wang Z, Gao Y, Breuil C, Hatton JV: Wood extractives and pitch problems: analysis and partial removal by biological treatment. Appita 1994; 47: 463–468.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoffman GC, Brush TS, Farrell RL: Cartapip: A biopulping product for control of pitch and resin acid problems in pulp and paper mills. Nav Stores Rev 1982; 102(3): 10–12.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blanchette RA, Farrell RL, Burnes TA, Wendler PA, Zimmerman W, Brush TS, Snyder RA: Biological control in pulp and paper production by Ophiostoma piliferum. Tappi J 1992; 75(12): 102–106.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Farrell RL, Blanchette RA, Brush TS, Gysin B, Hadar Y, Wendler PA, Zimmerman W: Cartapip: A biopulping product for control of pitch and resin acid problems in pulp and paper industry. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Biotechnology in the Pulp and Paper Industry Kuwahara M, Shimada M, eds. Tokyo: Unipublishers, 1992; 23–32.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Farrell RL, Blanchette RA, Brush TS, Hadar Y, Iverson S, Krisa K, Wendler PA, Zimmerman W: Cartapip, a biopulping product for control of pitch and resin acid problem in pulp mills. J Biotechnol. 1993; 30: 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    THaller, GKile: Cartapip treatment of wood chips to reduce pitch and improve processing. Proc Tappi Pulp Conf 1992; 1243–1252.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lim CS, Cho NS: Studies on the biological degradation of oak wood by white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J Tappi Korea 1992; 22: 32–44.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fischer K, Akhtar M, Blanchette RA, Burnes TA, Messner K, Kirk TK: Reduction of resin content in wood chips during experimental biological pulping process. Holzforschung 1994; 48: 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Akhtar M, Blanchette RA, Myers G, Kirk TK: An Overview of biomechanical pulping research. In: Environmentally friendly technologies for the pulp and paper industry. Young RA, Akhtar M, eds. 1998; 309–340.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schmitt EK, Miranda MB, Williams DP: Applications of fungal inocula in the pulp and paper industry. Presented in 7th International Conference on Biotechnology in Pulp and Paper Industry, Vancouver, BC, June 16–19,1998.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nilsson T, Asserson A: Treating wood chips with fungi to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis. US Patent 1969; 3 486, 969, 5 pages.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gibson K: Application of lipase enzmes in mechanical pulp production. Tappi Pulp Conf 1991; Book 2: 775–780.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fischer K, Messner K: Reducing troublesome pitch in pulp mills by lipolytic enzymes. Tappi J 1992; 75(2) 130–134.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fischer K, Messner K: Biological pitch reduction of sulfite pulp on pilot scale. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Biotechnology in Pulp and Paper Industry, Kyoto, Japan 1992; 169–174.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fischer K, Puchinger L, Schloffer K, Kreiner W, Messner K: Enzymatic pitch reduction of sulfite pulp on pilot scale. J Biotechnol 1993; 27: 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mustranta A, Fagernas L, Viikari L: Effects of lipases on birch extractives. Tappi J 1995; 78(2) 140–146.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sarkar JM, Tseng AM, Hartig ET: Application of enzymes and polymers for controlling pitch in papermaking, Proceedings Papermakers Conference, Chicago, Illinois, Tappi Press 1995; 175–182.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sarkar JM, Finck MR: Method for controlling pitch deposits using lipase and cationic polymer, US Patent 1993; 5,256,252: 25 pages.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pratima Bajpai
    • 1
  • Pramod K. Bajpai
    • 1
  • Ryuichiro Kondo
    • 2
  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DivisionThapar Corporate Research & Development CentrePatialaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Forest Products, Faculty of AgricultureKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations