Socio-Demographic Risk Factors for Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease in the Paquid Study

  • J. F. Dartigues
  • C. Helmer
  • L. Letenneur
Conference paper
Part of the Research and Perspectives in Alzheimer’s Disease book series (ALZHEIMER)


Paquid (Personne Agée QUID) is a French population-based prospective cohort study conducted in the Bordeaux area and specifically designed to study normal and pathological brain aging (Barberger-Gateau et al. 1992). The main objective of Paquid was initially the analysis of the natural history of the cognitive disorders occurring at the very early phase of dementia. However, the baseline data collection and the follow-up of the cohort provided the opportunity to study the relationships between several potential risk factors and the risk of subsequent dementia or Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). We will present here some results about these risk factors with special attention to socio-demographic factors such as age, gender, level of education and marital status.


Electoral Roll Wine Consumption Baseline Screening Primary School Level Objective Health Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. APA (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Edition I II Revised (DSM-III R). Washington DC, American Psychiatric AssociationGoogle Scholar
  2. Barberger-Gateau P, Chaslerie A, Dartigues JF, Commenges D, Gagnon M, Salamon R (1992) Health measures correlates in a French elderly population: the Paquid study. J Gerontol 47: S88 - S95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Benton A (1965) Manuel pour l’application du test de rétention visuelle. Applications cliniques et expérimentales. Paris, Centre de Psychologie AppliquéeGoogle Scholar
  4. Breslow N, Day N (1987) Statistical method in cancer research. Vol. 2. Lyon, IARC Scientific Publications n° 82, WHOGoogle Scholar
  5. Commenges D, Letenneur L, Joly P (1997) Re: „Serum transferrin saturation, stroke incidence, and mortality in women and men. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study? ’ Am J Epidemiol 146: 683–684PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Commenges D, Letenneur L, Joly P, Alioum A, Dartigues JF (1998) Modelling age-specific risk: application to dementia. Stat Med 17: 1973–1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dartigues, JF, Gagnon M, Michel P, Letenneur L, Commenges D, Barberger-Gateau P, Auriacombe S, Rigal B, Bedry R, Alperovitch A, Orgogozo JM, Henry P, Loiseau P, Salamon R (1991) Le programme de recherche Paquid sur l’épidémiologie de la démence. Méthodologie et résultats initiaux. Rev Neurol (French) 147: 225–230Google Scholar
  8. Fabrigoule C, Letenneur L, Dartigues JF, Zarrouk M, Commenges D, Barberger-Gateau P (1995) Social and leisures activities and risk of dementia: a prospective longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc 43: 485–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-Mental State. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicians. J Psychiatr Res 12: 189–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka F, Du Boulay GH, McAllister VL, Marshall J, Russell RWR, Symon L (1975) Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol 32: 632–637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Isaacs B, Akhtar A (1972) The set test: a rapid test of mental function in old people. Age Aging 1: 222–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Katz S, Downs T, Cash H, Grotz R (1970) Progress in development of the index of A.D.L. Gerontologist 10: 20–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Korn EL, Graubard BI, Midthune D (1997) Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of the time-scale. Am J Epidemiol 145: 72–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawton M, Brody E (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9: 179–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services task force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 34: 939–944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1: 385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wechsler D (1945) A standardized memory scale for clinical use. J Psychol 19: 87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wechsler D (1981) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Manual. New York Psychological CorpGoogle Scholar
  19. Zazzo R (1964) Test des deux barrages. Actualités pédagogiques et psychologiques. Neuchâtel, Delachaux et NiestléGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Dartigues
    • 1
  • C. Helmer
    • 1
  • L. Letenneur
    • 1
  1. 1.INSERM U 330Université de Bordeaux IIBordeaux CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations