Skip to main content
  • 76 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In der kanadischen Provinz British Columbia ist der Zugang zu und die Erstattung von verschreibungspflichtigen Arzneimitteln (AM) in drei Stufen gegliedert. Die erste Stufe stellt die Zulassung einer neuen chemischen Substanz dar, die in Abhängigkeit von deren Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit durch die kanadische Bundesbehörde „Therapeutics Products Program“ (TPP) vergeben wird [27]. Entscheidungen dieser Behörde beruhen auf dem Food and Drugs Act, division seven [18] und sind für alle 14 Provinzen verbindlich. Das TPP ist in seinen Regulations-pflichten und -befugnissen vergleichbar mit dem BfArM in Deutschland oder der FDA in den USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Anis A. H., Rahman T., Schechter M.T. (1998): Using pharmacoeconomic analysis to make drug insurance coverage decisions. PharmacoEconomics, 13:119–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anis, A.H., Guh D., Wang X. (1999): A dog’s breakfast: Prescription drug coverage varies widely across Canada. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anis, A.H., Wen Q. (1998): Price regulation of pharmaceuticals in Canada. J Health Economics, 17:21–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brogan Inc (1997): Factors affecting the cost of private drug plans: 1993–1996. Brogan, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Canadian Office of Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA) (1994): Guidelines for economic evaluations of pharmaceuticals. CCOHTA, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cantor J.C., Gross D.J. (1993): The effects of a drug price review board: Lessons from the Canadian Experience. Washington DC, US General Accounting Office.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Danzon P.M. (1997): Pharmaceutical price regulation. American Enterprise Institute, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Danzon P.M. (1999): Price comparisons for pharmaceuticals. A review of U.S. and cross-national studies. American Enterprise Institute, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fricke U., Klaus W.: Neue Arzneimittel 1997. Fortschritte für die Arzneimitteltherapie? Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gold M.R., Siegel J.E., Russell L.B., Weinstein M.C. (1996): Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Litsch M., Reichelt H., Selke G.W. (1990): Auswirkungen der Arzneimittel-Festbeträge. WIdO, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maclure M., Potashnik T.M. (1997): What is direct evidence-based policy-making? Experience from the drug benefits program for seniors in British Columbia. Can J Aging/Can J Public Policy: 132–146.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer W.N. (1994): Access to affordable medicines: the role of the Canadian Patented Medicine Review Board. Proceedings, Annual meeting of the International Society of Technology Assessment in Health Care (no. 133).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patented Medicines Prices Review Board (1993): International price comparison studies.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pharmacare Trends (1997): British Columbia Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors. Victoria, British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schneeweiss S., Maclure M., Glynn R.J., Soumerai S.B., Dormutil G, Walker A.M. (1999): The impact of differential cost sharing of ACE inhibitors (ACEI) on drug utilization. Am J Epidemiol: 149:154.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schröder H., Selke G.W. (1999): Der Arzneimittelmarkt in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In: Schwabe U., Paffrath D.: Arzneiverordnungs-Report 1998 (S.627), Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Food and Drugs Act and Regulations: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/food-.

  19. Health Canada: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/index.htm.

  20. Pacific Blue Cross: URL: http://www.pac.bluecross.ca/.

  21. Patented Medicine Prices Review Board: http://www.pmprb-cepmb.gc.ca/.

  22. Von Pharmacare erstattete Preise: http://www.hlth.gov.bc.ca/pharme/outgoing/index.html.

  23. Pharmacoeconomics Initiative: http://www.pharmacoeconomics.ubc.ca/.

  24. Statistisches Bundesamt: http://www.sMistik-bund.de/presse/deutsch/pm/p0039022.htm.

  25. Studiengang Öffentliche Gesundheit und Epidemiologie der Universität München: http://www.med.uni-muenchen.de/mfv/studiengang/studienfuehrer.html.

  26. Therapeutics Initiative: http://www.ti.ubc.ca/.

  27. Therapeutics Products Program: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Hiedelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneeweiß, S. (2000). British Columbia. In: Klauber, J., Schröder, H., Selke, G.W. (eds) Innovation im Arzneimittelmarkt. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59796-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59796-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64129-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59796-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics