Floc Characterisation at Full Scale: The Case of Humic Waters

  • D. H. Bache
  • E. Rasool
  • D. Moffat
  • M. Johnson
Conference paper


This paper describes part of a larger scale investigation designed to characterise humic flocs and focuses on those found in the flocculators at full scale. Following a section dealing with the basic parameterisation, the paper provides insight into the techniques which were employed. Insight is provided into some limitations of image analysis when attempting to measure floc size. It is shown that floc sizes measured in a sample stream withdrawn from a stirred vessel bares little resemblance to those measured in situ. From a survey carried at ten WTWs, it was apparent that the greatest influence on floc size and density was the presence of polymer. There was evidence that the presence of high alkalinity induced properties comparable with polymer addition. Little correspondence existed between floc sizes at full scale and those found in a laboratory scale mixer at identical values of velocity gradient. It was evident that DAF plants performed satisfactorily whatever the size of the incoming floc.


Full Scale Sample Stream Floc Size Humic Water Beaker Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bache, D.H., Rasool, E., Ali, A., McGilligan, J.F.: Floc Character: Measurement and Role in Optimum Dosing. J Wat. SRT-Aqua 44 (2) (1995) 83–92Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tambo, N., Watanabe, Y.: Physical Characteristics of Flocs-I. The Floc Density Function and Aluminium floc. Wat. Res. 13 (1979) 409–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bache, D.H., Hossain, M.D.: Optimum Coagulation Conditions for Coloured Water in terms of Floc Properties, J Wat. SRT-Aqua 40 (3) 1991 170–178Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gregory, J.: Fundamentals of Flocculation. In CRC Crit. Rev. Environ. Control. 19 (3) (1985) 185–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bache, D.H., Rasool, E., Moffat, D., McGilligan, F.J.: On the Strength and Character of Alumino-Humic Flocs. Water Sei. Tech. 40 (9) (1999), 81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tambo, N., Hozumi, H.: Physical characteristics of flocs-II. Strength of Floc. Wat. Res. 13 (1979) 421–427Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parker, D.S., Warren, A.M., Kaufman, M., Jenkins, D.: Floc Breakup in Turbulent Flocculation Processes. J. San. Eng. Div., ASCE, 98 (SA1), (1972) 79–99Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valade, M.T., Edzwald, J.K., Tobiason, J.E., Dahlquist, J., Hedberg, T., Amato, T.: Particle removal by flotation and filtration: pretreatment effects. J A WW A 88 (12X1996) 35–47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. H. Bache
    • 1
  • E. Rasool
    • 1
  • D. Moffat
    • 1
  • M. Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.North West WaterLingley MereGreat SankeyUK

Personalised recommendations