Skip to main content

Measures to Evaluate Rankings of Classification Algorithms

  • Conference paper
Data Analysis, Classification, and Related Methods

Abstract

Due to the wide variety of algorithms for supervised classification originating from several research areas, selecting one of them to apply on a given problem is not a trivial task. Recently several methods have been developed to create rankings of classification algorithms based on their previous performance. Therefore, it is necessary to develop techniques to evaluate and compare those methods. We present three measures to evaluate rankings of classification algorithms, give examples of their use and discuss their characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BRAZDIL, P. and SOARES C. (2000): A Comparison of Ranking Methods for Classification Algorithm Selection. To be published in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAMA, J. and BRAZDIL, P. (1995): Characterization of Classification Algorithms. In: Pinto-Ferreira, C. and Mamede, N. (Eds.):Progress in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIETTERICH, T.G (1998): Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms. Neural Computation, 10, 7, 1895–1924ftp://ftp.cs.orst.edu/pub/tgd/papers/nc-stats.ps.gz

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAKHAEIZADEH, G. and SCHNABL, A. (1997): Development of Multi-Criteria Metrics for Evaluation of Data Mining Algorithms. In: D. Heckerman and H. Mannila and D. Pregibon and R. Uthurusamy (Eds.): Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AAAI Press, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEAVE, H.R. and WORTHINGTON, P.L. (1992):Distribution-Free Tests Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • SALZBERG, S.L. (1997): On Comparing Classifiers: Pitfalls to Avoid and a Recommended Approach.Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery1, 317–327 http://www.cs.jhu.edu/~salzberg/critique.ps

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SOARES, C.P. (1999):Ranking Classification Algorithms on Past Performance. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Economics, University of Portohttp://www.ncc.up.pt/~csoares/miac/thesis_revised.zip

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Soares, C., Brazdil, P., Costa, J. (2000). Measures to Evaluate Rankings of Classification Algorithms. In: Kiers, H.A.L., Rasson, JP., Groenen, P.J.F., Schader, M. (eds) Data Analysis, Classification, and Related Methods. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59789-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59789-3_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67521-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59789-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics