Advertisement

Comparison and evaluation of the new Russian global geopotential model to degree 360

  • G. Demianov
  • A. Maiorov
  • P. Medvedev
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 121)

Abstract

A new Russian global geopotential model was created with the use of detailed gravity data, satellite tracking and altimetry data. Through the research and operations executed, the global Earth gravity field model GAO-98 with the resolution level corresponding to the geopotential expansion into spherical harmonics up to 360th degree has been developed. The main parameters of the model developed are a set of mean anomalies for 30’ x 30’ — blocks covering the whole surface of Earth and a set of spherical harmonics to 360th degree resulted from the expansion of the geopotential. The model is destined mainly for use in highly accurate quasigeoidal height determination, which will significantly improve the efficiency of implementing GPS/GLONASS satellite equipment unto the routine geodetic operations of the Federal Service of Geodesy and Cartography of Russia. The accuracy of absolute quasigeoid heights by use of the model developed is for most regions of Russia Mç = ŷ20–25 cm. The test data that we used for model evaluations include geoid undulations (or height anomalies) determined from GPS positioning and level observations, global geopotential models EGM96, global marine gravity field from Russian GEOIK altimetry data and from GEOSAT, ERS-1, TOPEX/POSEIDON data. Future problems geoid determinations discussed.

Keywords

Global geopotential model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashjaee J., G.V. Demyanov et al. “Precise positioning with the use of JPS legacy GPSIGLONASS Receivers”. IUGG Birmingham.Google Scholar
  2. Bursa M., G.V.Demyanov, M.I.Yurkina “On the determination of the Earth’s model — the mean equipotential surface”. Studia geoph. et geod. 42 (1998).Google Scholar
  3. Demianov G.V., V.I. Kaftan, V.I. Zubinsky Participation of the Central Research Institute of Geodesy, Aerial Surveying and Cartography in the third Baltic Sea Level GPS Campaign, Paper on the Second workshop “Results of the Third Baltic Sea Level GPS Compaign,1997” of the sub-commission IAG SSG 8.1 Studies of the Baltic Sea.Google Scholar
  4. Medvedev P., Yu S., Tyupkin, S.A. Lebedev. An Integrated Satellite Altimetry, Gravity, Geodesy Data Base: Architecture, Verification Data Processing, Data Base Management System. Presented to XXII General Assembly of IUGG, Birmingham, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Medvedev P., S.A. Lebedev, Yu.S. Tyupkin, V.F. Galazin, D.I. Pleshakov, AN Zueva. An Integrated Satellite Altimety Data Base and Final Results of Russian Alrimetry Data Processing. Presented to 2nd Joint Meeting of the IGC/IGeC, Trieste, Italy, September, 5–9, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. Zubinsky VI., GV Demianov et al. “Experimental estimation of heights accuracy by GPS construction big extent”.Proceeding of TcNVIIGAiK. 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Zhalkovsky EA, GA Demyanov, BV Brovar, AN Mayorov, VA Taranov, MI Yurkina “Gravimetry and Modern Satellite Geodesy”. Proceeding of TcNIIGAiK. 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SPringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Demianov
    • 1
  • A. Maiorov
    • 1
  • P. Medvedev
    • 2
  1. 1.Central Research Institute of Geodesy, Air Surveying and CartographyFederal Service of Geodesy and Cartography of RussiaMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Geophysical CenterRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations