Advertisement

Evaluation of Contact Stress and Fracture Parameters

  • K. Ramesh

Abstract

In many mechanical devices, there exist contact between two or more parts such as in gears, rolling element bearings, locomotive wheels and rails etc. The stresses caused by the pressure distribution between the bodies in contact are of importance in the design of these parts. Hertz [1] pointed out that in the absence of friction, the maximum shear stress occurs beneath the surface of contacting bodies. This leads to pitting of the contacting surfaces. The material lost from the surface due to pitting may get trapped into the contacting surfaces, causing abrasive wear. Smith and Liu [2] studied the effect of friction between the contacting surfaces. They reported that under certain conditions, the point of maximum shear stress could also occur at the surface of contacting bodies. The knowledge of contact zone and coefficient of friction between the contacting bodies is essential for evaluating the design of such contacting elements.

Keywords

Stress Intensity Factor Contact Stress Stress Intensity Factor Fringe Pattern Fracture Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Morton WB, Close LZ (1922) Notes on Hertz’s theory of the contact of elastic bodies. Phil Mag Series 6, 43:320–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith JO, Liu CK (1953) Stresses due to tangential and normal loads on an elastic solid with application to some contact stress problems. J Appl Mech 20:157–166Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broek D (1986) Elementary engineering fracture mechanics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broek D (1989) The practical use of fracture mechanics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murakami Y (1987) Stress intensity factors handbook Vol I, Vol II, Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tada H, Paris P, Irwin G (1973) The stress analysis of cracks. Handbook. Del research corporation, HellertownGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sirkis JS, Chen YM, Singh H, Cheng AY (1992) Computerised optical fringe pattern analysis in photomechanics: a review. Opt Engng 31(2):304–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shukla A, Nigam H (1985) A numerical-experimental analysis of the contact stress problem. J Strain Analysis for Engng Des 20(4):241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pankhawalla VA, Ramesh K, Dixit PM (1998) Evaluation of contact stress parameters by digital photoelasticity in non-linear mechanics. Kalyanaraman V, Sriram P (eds) Allied publishers, New Delhi, pp 284–291Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Westergaard HM (1939) Bearing pressure and cracks. J Appl Mech 6:A49–A53Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Irwin GR (1957) Analysis of stress and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate. J Appl Mech 24:361–364Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wells AA, Post D (1958) The dynamic stress distribution surrounding a running crack - a photoelastic analysis. Proc SESA 16(l):69–92Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Irwin GR (1958) Discussion of paper by Wells A, Post D. The dynamic stress distribution surrounding a running crack - a photoelastic analysis. Proc SESA, 16(1):93–95Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sih GC (1966) On the Westergaard method of crack analysis. Int J Fracture Mech 2:628–631Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eftis J, Liebowitz H (1972) On the modified Westergaard equations for certain crack problems. Int J Fracture Mech 8:383–391Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eftis J, Subramonian N, Liebowitz H (1977) Crack border stress and displacement equations revisited. Engng Fracture Mech 9:189–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paris PC, Sih GC (1965) Stress analysis of cracks. ASTM STP 381:30–81Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chona R, Irwin GR, Sanford RJ (1983) Influence of specimen size and shape on the singularity dominated zone. ASTM 791:13–123Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramesh K (1994) Recent advances on the application of digital computers in experimental evaluation of stress field parameters in fracture mechanics. J Aero Soc India 46(4):224–237Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramesh K, Yadav AK, Pankhawalla VA (1995) Plotting of fringe contours from finite element results. Communications in Numer Meth in Engng 11:839–847MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sanford RJ (1979) A critical re-examination of Westergaard method for solving opening mode crack problems. Mech Res Communications 6(5):289–294MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramesh K, Gupta S, Srivastava AK, Kelkar AA (1995) Use of higher order stress field equations for the evaluation of stress field parameters in fracture mechanics. ARDB-STR-TR-95-786-02Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams ML (1957) On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack. J Appl Mech 24:109–114MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Atluri SN, Kobayashi AS (1987) Mechanical response of materials. In: Kobayashi AS (ed) Handbook on experimental mechanics. Prentice Hall, New York pp 1–37Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramesh K, Gupta S, Srivastava AK (1996) Equivalence of multi-parameter stress field equations in fracture mechanics. Int J Fracture Mech 79:R37–R41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bradley WB, Kobayashi AS (1970) An investigation of propagating cracks by dynamic photoelastic analysis. Exp Mech 10(3): 106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Etheridge JM, Dally JW (1977) A critical review of methods for determining stress intensity factors from isochromatic fringes. Exp Mech 17:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramesh K (1991) Experimental determination of stress intensity factors in isotropic model materials by the technique of photoelasticity. ARDB-STR-TR-91- 540-02Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sanford RJ, Dally JW (1972) A general method for determining mixed mode stress intensity factors. Engng Fracture Mech 4:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schroedl MA, Smith CW (1975) A study of near and far field effects in photoelastic stress intensity factors. Engng Fracture Mech 7:341–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rosakis AJ, Ravichandar K (1986) On crack tip stress state: an experimental evaluation of three-dimensional effects. Int J Solids and Structures 22(2):121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ramesh K, Gupta S, Kelkar AA (1996) Evaluation of stress field parameters in fracture mechanics by photoelasticity - revisited. Engng Fracture Mech 56:25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chauhan DPS (1990) An experimental study of static and dynamic behaviour of cyclically symmetric radial cracks. M.Tech Thesis, Dept of Mech Engg, IIT KanpurGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ramesh K, Kelkar AA, Pankhawalla VA, Dixit PM (1996) Automated photoelastic evaluation of stress intensity factors for cracked gear teeth. In: Lakshmana Rao C (ed) Recent Advances in Solid Mechanics. Allied Publishers, New Delhi,Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dally JW, Chen YM (1991) A photoelastic study of friction at multipoint contacts. Exp Mech 31:144–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Inoue K, Kato M, Yamanaka M (1989) Fatigue strength and crack growth of carburised and shot-peened gears. Proc Int Power Transmission and Gearing Conference, ASME:663-668Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Honda H, Conway JC (1979) An analysis by finite element techniques of the effects of a crack in the gear tooth fillet and its applicability to evaluating strength of the flawed gears. Bulletin of JSME 22(174): 1848–1855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Erdogan F, Sih GC (1972) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J Basic Engng 85:441–446Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sih GC (1974) Strain energy density factor applied to mixed mode problems. Int J Fracture Mech 10:305–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Williams JG, Ewing PD (1972) Fracture under complex stress - the angled crack problem. Int J Fracture Mech 8:441–446Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Viswanadham K (1998) Contact stress and fracture analysis of a spur gear. M. Tech thesis, IIT KanpurGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Ramesh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations