Advertisement

Steps Toward a Robust High-Order Simulation Tool for Aerospace Applications

  • Harold L. Atkins
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 11)

Abstract

The discontinuous Galerkin method is seemingly immune to many of the problems that commonly plague high-order finite-difference methods, and as such, has the potential to bring the robustness of low-order methods and the efficiency of high-order methods to bear on a broad class of engineering problems. However the dependence of the method on numerical quadrature has significantly increased the cost of the method and limited the use of the method to element shapes for which quadrature formulas are readily available. A quadrature-free formulation has been proposed that allows the discontinuous Galerkin method to be implemented for any element shape and for polynomial basis functions of any degree.

Keywords

Quadrature Formula Discontinuous Galerkin Method Element Shape Numerical Quadrature Curve Wall 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bassi, F. and Rebay, S., “Accurate 2D Euler Computations by Means of a High-Order Discontinuous Finite Element Method,” Proceedings of the Conference Held in Bangalore, India, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, October 1995, pp. 234–240.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bassi, F. and Rebay, S., “Discontinuous Finite Element High Order Accruate Numerical Solution of the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations,” Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Clarendon, Oxford, England, UK, 1995, pp. 295–302.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lowrie, R. B., Roe, P. L., and van Leer, B., “A Space-Time Discontinuous Galerkin Method for the Time-Accurate Numerical Solution of Hyperbolic Conservation Laws,” AIAA Paper-95–1658, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atkins, H. L. and Shu, C.-W., “Quadrature-Free Implementation of Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Hyperbolic Equations,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 36, No. 5, 1998, pp. 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cockburn, B., Hou, S., and Shu, C.-W., “TVB Runge-Kutta Local Projection Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Conservation Laws IV: The MultiDimensional Case,” Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 54, No. 190, 1990, pp. 545–581.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubiner, M., “Spectral Methods on Triangles and Other Domains,” Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 6, 1991, pp. 345.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sherwin, S. J. and Karniadakis, G. E., “A New Triangular and Tetrahedral Basis for High-Order (hp) Finite Element Methods,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 38, 1999, pp. 3775–3802.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atkins, H. L., “Local Analysis of Shock Capturing Using Discontinuous Galerkin Methodology,” AIAA Paper 97–2032, 1997, 13th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass Village, Colorado, June 29-July 2.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Atkins, H. L., “Continued Development of the Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Computational Aeroacoustic Applications,” AIAA Paper-97–1581, 1997, Third Joint CEAS/AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, May 12–14.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atkins, H. L. and Lockard, D. P., “A High-Order Method Using Unstructured Grids for the Aeroacoustic Analysis of Realistic Aircraft Configurations,” AIAA Paper-99–1945, 1999, Fifth Joint AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, May 10–12.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marcum, D. L., “Generation of Unstructured Grids for Viscous Flow Applications,” AIAA Paper-95–0212, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold L. Atkins
    • 1
  1. 1.NASA Langley Research CenterHamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations