Advertisement

Qualitätskriterien Onkologischer Studien

  • Th. Lehnert
Conference paper
Part of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie book series (DTGESCHIR, volume 2000)

Zusammenfassung

Für die Bewertung des Evidenzgrades randomisierter Studien spielt auch die Studienqualität eine Rolle. Insbesondere chirurgische Therapiestudien müssen auf eine exakte Beschreibung und hohe Qualität der Therapie achten. Die Studienqualität in Planung, Auswertung und Präsentation kann mit Hilfe von Summenscores beschrieben werden.

Schlüsselwörter

Randomisierte Studien Qualitätssicherung 

Quality Criteria for Oncological Studies

Summary

The quality of randomized trials is relevant for their respective evidence grade. Studies involving operative treatment must aim at precise description of procedures and high surgical quality. The overall quality of studies can be described in terms of planning, statistical analysis and presentation using sum scores.

Key words

Randomized trials Quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Desch C, Benson AB, Smith TJ, Flynn PJ, Krause C, Lprinzi CL, Minsky BD, Petrelli NJ, Pfister DG, Somerfield MR (1999) Recommended Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 17: 1312–1321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Choti MA, Kaufman HS, Bender JS, Duncan MD, Magnuson TH, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL (1999) Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg 230: 404–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist LE (1997) Influence of hospital-and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 84: 657–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Porter GA, Soskolne CL, Yakimets WW, Newman SC (1998) Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 227: 157–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (1995) Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273: 1421–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kronborg O (1995) Acute obstruction from tumour in the left colon without spread.A randomized trial of emergency colostomy versus resection. Int J Colorectal Dis so: 1–5Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dube S, Heyen F, Jenicek M (1997) Adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal carcinoma: results of a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 40: 35–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, Tugwell P, Klassen TP (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352: 609–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Th. Lehnert
    • 1
  1. 1.Sektion für Chirurgische OnkologieChirurgische UniversitätsklinikHeidelbergDeutschland

Personalised recommendations