Advertisement

Geographie Transaction Costs and Specialisation Opportunities of Small and Medium-Sized Regions: Scale Economies and Market Extension

  • Börje Johansson
  • Charlie Karlsson
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstracts

In recent decades an embryo of a new theory of specialisation and trade has been developed with an emphasis on differentiated competition, scale economies and size of the “home market” (e.g. Krugman, 1990). As regards the size of the home market several contributions focus on the country as the potential home market (e.g. Porter, 1990), which may be described as an ad hoc approach without any clear theoretical underpinning. In response to this type of deficiencies, this paper introduces a theoretical framework based on the concepts of a functional region and its product-specific market potentials. This approach is developed to improve the analysis of small and medium-sized regions, with an emphasis on their internal and external market interactions.

Keywords

Transaction Cost Market Potential Functional Region Scale Economy External Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balassa, B. and L. Bauwens, 1988, “The Determinants of Intra-European Trade in Manufactured Goods”, European Economic Review, 32:1421–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batten, D.F. and B. Johansson, 1985, “Price Adjustments and Multiregional Rigidities in the Analysis of World Trade”, Papers of Regional Science Association, 56:145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batten, D.F. and D. Boyce, 1986, “Spatial Interaction and Interregional Commodity Flow Models”, in P. Nijkamp (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. I, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. Bröcker, J., 1988, “Interregional Trade and Economic Integration: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18:261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burenstam-Linder, S., 1961, An Essay on Trade and Transformation, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Chamberlin, E.H., 1933, Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Harvard Economic Studies, Vol. 38, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, D. and D. Weinstein, 1997, Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation, Harvard University and NBER.Google Scholar
  8. Dixit, R. and V. Norman, 1980, Theory of International Trade, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dixon, R. and A.P. Thirlwall, 1975, A Model of Regional Growth Differences along Kaldorean Lines, Oxford Economic Papers, 27:201–214.Google Scholar
  10. Ethier, W., 1982, “National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade”, American Economic Review, 72:389–405.Google Scholar
  11. Faini, R., 1984, “Increasing Returns, Nontraded Inputs, and Regional Development”, Economic Journal, 94:308–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujita, M., 1988, “A Monopolistic Competition Model of Spatial Agglomeration: A Differentiated Product Approach”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18:87–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, C., 1954, “The Market as a Factor in the Location of Industry in the United States”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 44:315–348.Google Scholar
  14. Harrod, R., 1939, “An Essay in Dynamic Theory”, Economic Journal, 49:14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Helpman, E., 1981, “International Trade in the Presence of Product Differentiation, Economies of Scale and Monopolistic Competition: A Chamberlain— Heckscher-Ohlin Approach”, Journal of International Economics, 11:305–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helpman, E., 1984, “Increasing Returns, Imperfect Markets and Trade Theory”, in R. Jones and P. Kenan (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 1, North Holland, Amsterdam, 325–365.Google Scholar
  17. Johansson, B., C. Karlsson and L. Westin, (eds.), 1993, Patterns of a Network Economy, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  18. Johansson, B. and L. Westin, 1991, “How Network Properties Influence Trade Patterns”, Paper presented at the 31st European Regional Science Association Congress in Lisbon.Google Scholar
  19. Johansson, B. and L. Westin, 1993, “Revealing Network Properties of Sweden’s Trade with Europe”, in B. Johansson, C. Karlsson and L. Westin (eds.), Patterns of a Network Economy, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 125–141.Google Scholar
  20. Johansson, B. and L. Westin, 1994, “Affinities and Frictions of Trade Networks”, Annals of Regional Science.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, R. and P. Kenan, (eds.), 1984, Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 1, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  22. Kaldor, N., 1970, “The Case for Regional Policies”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 17:337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krugman, P., 1979, “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and Inter-national Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 9:469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krugman, P., 1980, “Scale Economies, Product Differentiation and the Pattern of Trade”, American Economic Review, 70:950–959.Google Scholar
  25. Krugman, P., 1981, “Trade, Accumulation and Uneven Development”, Journal of Development Economics, 8:149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krugman, P., 1990, Rethinking International Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  27. Krugman, P., 1990a, “The Hub Effect: Or, Threeness in Interregional Trade”, mimeo, Department of Economics, MIT.Google Scholar
  28. Krugman, P., 1991, Geography and Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  29. Krugman, P., 1992, “A Dynamic Spatial Model”, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  30. Krugman, P., 1993, “First Nature, Second Nature, and Metropolitan Location”, Journal of Regional Science, 33:129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lancaster, K., 1980, “Intra-Industry Trade under Perfect Monopolistic Competition”, Journal of International Economics, 10:151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall, A., 1920, Principals of Economics, 8 ed., Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  33. Myrdal, G., 1957, Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions, Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  34. Ohlin, B., 1933, Interregional and International Trade, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  35. Porter, M.E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  36. Rivera-Batiz, F.L., 1988, “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and Agglomeration Economies in Consumption and Production”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18:87–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snickars, F. and J. Weibull, 1977, “A Minimum Information Principle: Theory and Practice”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 7:137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SOU 1997:13, Regionpolitik fòr hela Sverige, Fritzes, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  39. Stigler, G., 1951, “The Division of Labour is Limited by the Extent of the Market”, Journal of Political Economy, 59:185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Storper, M. and A.J. Scott, 1995, “The Wealth of Regions, Market Forces and Policy Imperatives in Local and Global Context”, Futures, 27.Google Scholar
  41. Sölvell, Ö., I. Zander and M.E. Porter, 1991, Advantage Sweden, Norstedt, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  42. Venables, A.J., 1995, “Economic Integration and the Location of Firms”, American Economic Review, 85:296–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Börje Johansson
    • 1
  • Charlie Karlsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations