Advertisement

Technology and Regional Development: Theory Revisited

  • John Rees
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

The continuing onset of globalization does not mean the End of Geography, when regions cease to matter as conceptual or empirical devices. Likewise, increasing attacks from alternative approaches to knowledge do not make theory any less important. It is a fundamental tenet of this paper that both regions and theory matter a great deal.

Keywords

Social Capital Regional Development Product Cycle High Tech Regional Innovation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlbrant, R.S., R.J. Fruehan and F. Giarratani, 1996, The Renaissances of American Steel, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Amin, A. and N. Thrift, (eds.), 1994, Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Bennis, W. and B. Nanus, 1991, Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Castells, M. and P. Hall, 1994, Technopoles of the World, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  5. Cooke, P., (ed.), 1995, The Rise of the Rustbelt, UC Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. Cooke, P., 1996, “The New Wave of Regional Innovation Networks: Analysis, Characteristics and Strategy”, Small Business Economics, 8:159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooke, P., 1992, “Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe”, Geoforum, 23:365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desantis, M. and R. Stough, 1997, “Modeling Leadership in Regional Economic Development”, Working Paper, Institute of Public Policy, George Mason University.Google Scholar
  9. Dubini, P., 1989, “The Influence of Motivations and Environment on Business Start Ups: Some Hints for Public Policies”, Journal of Business Venturing, 4:11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erickson, R.A., 1994, “Technology, Industrial Restructuring and Regional Development”, Growth and Change, 25:353–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erickson, R. and T. Leinbach, 1979, “Characteristics of Branch Plants Attracted to Nonmetropolitan Areas”, in R. Lonsdale and H.L. Seyler (eds.), Nonmetropolitan Industrialization, Winston, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Feldman, M.P. and R. Florida, 1994, “The Geographical Sources of Innovation in the US”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84:210–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feyerabend, P., 1975, Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, Verso, London.Google Scholar
  14. Feyerabend, P., 1987, Farewell to Reason, Verso, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Florida, R., 1995, “Toward the Learning Region”, Futures, 27:527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman, C., 1995, “The National System of Innovation in Historic Perspective”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19:5–24.Google Scholar
  17. Fukuyama, F., 1995, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Hansen, N., 1992, “Competition Trust and Reciprocity in the Development of Innovative Regional Milieus”, Papers in Regional Science, 71:95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansson, B. and C. Karlsson, 1987, “Processes of Industrial Change: Scale Location and Type of Job”, in M. Fischer and P. Nijkamp (eds.), Regional Labor Markets, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  20. Krugman, P., 1991, Geography and Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  21. Link, A. and J. Rees, 1990, “Firm Size, University Based Research and the Returns to R and D”, Small Business Economics, 2:25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luebke, P., 1990, Tar Heel Politics: Myths and Realities, University of North Carolina Press, London.Google Scholar
  23. Maillat, D. ,1998, “From the Innovative Milieu to the Learning Region”, Paper presented at the International Workshop on Regional Development, Uddevalla, Sweden.Google Scholar
  24. Maillat, D. and B. Lecoq, 1992, “New Technologies and Transformation of Regional Structures in Europe: The Role of the Milieu”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 4:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malecki, E.J., 1997, Technology and Economic Development, 2nd Edition, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  26. Malecki E.J., 1998, “How Development Occurs: Local Knowledge Social Capital and Institutional Embeddedness”, Paper, Southern Regional Science Association, Savannah.Google Scholar
  27. Malmberg, A., 1996, Industrial Geography: Agglomeration and Local Milieu, Progress in Human Geography, 20:392–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malmberg, A., 1997, “Industrial Geography: Location and Learning”, Progress in Human Geography, 21:573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markusen, A.R., 1985, Profit Cycles Oligopoly and Regional Development, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  30. Nelson, R.R. and S. Winter, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Nelson, R.R., 1995, “Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change”, Journal of Economic Literature, 33:48–90.Google Scholar
  32. Norton, R.D. and J. Rees, 1979, “The Product Cycle and the Decentralization of American Manufacturing”, Regional Studies, 13:141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Brien, R., 1992, Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography, Pinter Press, London.Google Scholar
  34. Ohlin, B., 1993, Interregional and Regional Trade, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  35. Ohmae, K., 1993, “The Rise of the Region State”, Foreign Affairs, 92:78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piore, M. J. and C. F. Sabel, 1984, The Second Industrial Divide, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Porter, M.E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Rees, J., 1979, “Technological Change and Regional Shifts in American Manufacturing”, Professional Geographer, 31:45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rees, J., 1979, “Regional Industrial Shifts in the U. S. and the Internal Generation of Manufacturing in Growth Centers of the Southwest”, in W. Wheaton (ed.), Interregional Movements and Regional Growth, COUPE 2, Urban Institute, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  40. Rees, J. and H.A. Stafford, 1986, “Theories of Regional Growth and Industrial Location: Their Relevance for Understanding High Technology Complexes”, in J. Rees, (ed.), Technology, Regions and Policy, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa.Google Scholar
  41. Rees, J., 1991, “State Technology Programs and Industry Experience in the USA”, Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 3:39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rees, J. and K. Debbage, 1992, “Industry Knowledge Sources and the Role of Universities”, Policy Studies Review, 11:6–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rees, J., 1999, Regional Science: From Crisis to Opportunity, Papers in Regional Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  44. Rosenau, P.M., 1992, Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  45. Rosenfeld, S.A., 1996, “Does Cooperation Enhance Competitiveness? Assessing the Impacts of Inter-Firm Collaboration”, Research Policy, 25:247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saxenian, A., 1994, Regional Advantage, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  47. Schmandt, J. and R. Wilson, (eds,), 1990, Growth Policy in the Age of High Technology, Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  48. Schumpeter, J., 1942, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Scott, A.J., 1988, New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe, Pion, London.Google Scholar
  50. Scott, A.J., 1996, “Regional Motors of the Global Economy”, Futures, 28:391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shapira, P. and J.D. Roessner, 1996, “Evaluating Industrial Modernization: Introduction”, Research Policy, 25:181:183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sorenson, D. J., 1997, “An Empirical Evaluation of Profit Cycle Theory”, Journal of Regional Science, 37:275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Staber, U., 1996, “Accounting for Variations in the Performance of Industrial Districts: The Case of Baden-Wurttenberg”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20:299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sternberg, R., 1996, “Reasons for the Genesis of High Tech Regions - Theoretical Explanation and Empirical Evidence”, Geoform, 27:205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Storper, M., 1997, The Regional World, Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  56. Taylor, M. J., 1986, “The Product Cycle Model: A Critique”, Environment and Planning A, 18:751–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Testa, W.A., T.H.Klier and H. Mattoon, 1997, Assessing the Midwest Economy: Looking Back for the Future, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  58. Thomas, M.D., 1975, “Growth Pole Theory, Technological Change and Regional Economic Growth”, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 34:3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vernon, R., 1996, “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80:190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Whittington, D., (ed.), 1985, High Hopes for High Tech: Microelectronics Policy in North Carolina, UNC Press, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Rees
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations