Advertisement

Regional Dynamics with Endogenous Knowledge in a Multi-Sector Model

  • Wei-Bin Zhang
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

The dynamic relationship between the interregional division of labor, division of consumption and the determination of price structures in the global economy is a main concern of contemporary economics. In fact, economists have produced different trade theories, which deal with various aspects of international and inter-regional trade. Although Adam Smith held that a country could gain from free trade, he failed to create a convincing economic theory of international trade. It is generally agreed that David Ricardo is the creator of the classical theory of trade. The theories of comparative advantage and the gains from trade are usually connected with Ricardo. In this theory the crucial variable used to explain international trade patterns is technology. The theory holds that a difference in comparative costs of production is the necessary condition for the existence of international trade. But this difference reflects a difference in the techniques of production. According to this theory, technological differences between countries determine the international division of labor and consumption and trade patterns. It concludes that trade is beneficial to all participating countries. This conclusion is in contradiction to the viewpoint about trade held by the doctrine of mercantilism. In mercantilism regulation and planning of economic activity are held to be efficient means of fostering the goals of a nation. This theory assumes that production costs are independent from factor prices and the composition of output. Since it lacks consideration of the demand side, the theory cannot determine how and at what value the terms of trade are or should be.

Keywords

Economic Geography Regional Dynamics Trade Theory Land Rent Knowledge Stock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso, W., 1964, Location and Land Use, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, Å. and J. Mantsinen, 1986, “Mobility of Resources, Accessibility of Knowledge and Economic Growth”, Behavioural Science, 25:353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G.S., K.M. Murphy and R. Tamura, 1990 “Human Capital, Fertility and Economic Growth”, Journal of Economic Economy, 98:12–37.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, C., 1991, “Regional Heterogeneity, Migration, and Shadow Prices”, Journal of Public Economics, 46:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamond, D.B. and G.S. Tolley, (eds.), 1981, The Economics of Urban Amenities. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman, 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  7. Johansson, B. and C. Karlsson, (eds.), 1990, Innovation, Industrial Knowledge and Trade — A Nordic Perspective. CERUM at University of Umeå, Umeå.Google Scholar
  8. Kanemoto, Y., 1980, Theories of Urban Externalities, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. Krugman, P., 1991, “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography”. Journal of Political Economy, 99:483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lucas, R.E., 1986, “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22:3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rauch, J.E., 1991, “Comparative Advantage, Geographic Advantage and the Volume ofTrade” The Economic Journal, 101:1230–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roback, J., 1982, “Wages, Rents and Quality of Life”, Journal of Political Economy, 90:1257–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Scotchmer, S. and J.F. Thisse, 1992, “Space and Competition - A Puzzle”, The Annals of Regional Science, 26:269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Simon, J.L. and D.O. Love, 1990, “City Size, Prices, and Efficiency for Individual Goods and Services”, The Annals of Regional Science, 24:163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. von Thlinen, J.H., 1826, Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalekonomie, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  16. Voith, R., 1991, “Capitalization of Local and Regional Attributes into Wages and Rents - Differences Across Residential, Commercial and Mixed-Use Communities”, Journal of Regional Science, 31:129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang, W.B., 1992, “Trade and World Economic Growth — Differences in Knowledge Utilization and Creativity”, Economic Letters, 39:199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei-Bin Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of EconomicsNational University of SingaporeCrescentSingapore

Personalised recommendations