Clustering and Economic Change: New Policy Orientations — The Case of Styria

  • Michael Steiner
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


According to an (if not true, then well found) anecdote the world’s champion in heavy weight boxing walking along a nice sunny beach wants to take a swim. Taking off his clothes he thinks to protect them from getting stolen by putting a note on them: “These clothes belong to the world’s heavy weight champion in boxing.” Returning after a nice swim he finds his clothes gone, the note still there with the words written on the other side: “Thank you. Sincerely yours, world champion in long distance running.”


Regional Policy Technology Policy Hotel Industry Technological Cluster Member Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adametz, C., 1998, “Innovators for SMES”, Paper presented at the T3Net-Conference, March 1998, Vienna.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C. and D. Schon, 1978, Organizational Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, B., 1987, “Self-Reinforcing Mechanism in Economics”, Mimeo, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  4. Balthasar, A. and C. Knöpfel, 1993, Die Technologiepolitik europäischer Staaten and Japan. Ein Überblick über Deutschland, Frankreich, England, Schweden, Holland and Japan, Studie im Auftrag des Schweizerischen Wissenschaftsrates, Bern.Google Scholar
  5. Batt, H.-L., 1994, Kooperative regionale Industriepolitik, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  6. Bergman, E.M., 1998, “Industrial Trade Clusters in Action: Seeing Regional Economic Whole”, in M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation, European Research in Regional Science, vol. 8.Google Scholar
  7. Cappellin, R., 1997, “Regional Policy and Federalism in the Process of International Integration”, in K. Peschel (ed.), Regional Growth and Regional Policy within the Framework of European Integration, Springer-Physika Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  8. Cooke P. and K. Morgan, 1991, The Network Paradigm, Regional Industrial Research Report 8, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
  9. Cullen, J. , 1998, “Promoting Competitiveness for Small Business Clusters through Collaborative Learning: Policy Consequences from a European Perspective”, in M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation, European Research in Regional Science, vol. 8.Google Scholar
  10. Czamanski, D. and St. Czamanski, 1977, “Industrial Complexes: Their Typology, Structure and Relation to Economic Development”, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 38:93–111.Google Scholar
  11. DE.L.O.S., 1998, Developing Learning Organization Models in SME Clusters, TSER project (participating partners: Istituto G. Tagliacarne/Italy, Tavistock Institute/U.K., FormitlItaly, ECWS/Netherlands, CCI/France, Infyde/Spain), Project report available at the Istituto G. Tagliacarne/Rome.Google Scholar
  12. Dodgson, M., 1993, “Organizational Learning: The Review of Some Literatures”, Organizational Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3.Google Scholar
  13. Dodgson, M., 1996, “Learning, Trust and Inter-Firm Technological Linkages: Some Theoretical Associations”, in R. Coombs, et al., Technological Collaboration - The Dynamics of Cooperation in Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  14. Feser, E.J., 1998, “The Old and New Theory of Industry Clusters”, in M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation, European Research in Regional Science, Vol. 8.Google Scholar
  15. Fiol, C. and M. Lyles, 1995, “Organizational Learning”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 4.Google Scholar
  16. Florence, S. 1944, “The Selection of Industries Suitable for Dispersion into Rural Areas”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16:93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fritz, O., H. Mahringer and M. Valderrama, 1998, “A Risk-Oriented Analysis of Regional Clusters”, in M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation, European Research in Regional Science, Vol. 8.Google Scholar
  18. Geldner, N., 1998, “Erfolgreicher Strukturwandel in der Steiermark”, in WifoMonatsberichte 3, Osterreichisches Wirtschaftsforschungsinstitut, Wien.Google Scholar
  19. Harrigan, F., 1982, “The Relationship between Industrial and Geographical Linkages: A Case Study of the United Kingdom”, Journal of Regional Science, 22:19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrison, R.T., 1995, “Development in the Promotion of Informal Venture Capital”, in Fraunhofer Institut fair Systemtechnik and Innovationsforschung, Hrsg., EIMS Innovation Policy Workshop: “Innovation Financing: Private Investors, Banks & Technology Appraisal”, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  21. Hutschenreiter, G., 1994, Cluster Innovativer Aktivitaten in der Osterreichischen Industrie, tip, Wien.Google Scholar
  22. Jaffe, A.B., 1989, “Charachterizing the “Technological Position” of Firms, with Application to Quantifying Technological Opportunity and Research Spillovers”, Research Policy, Vol. 18, 2:87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaffe, A.B., et al. 1993, “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidences by Patent Citations”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 108, 3:577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jud, T. and D. Sturn, 1996, “Wie gestalten andere europaische Lander ihre Technologiepolitik?”, Wirtschaftspolitische Blotter, Vol. 43, 1:35–43.Google Scholar
  25. Kubin, I. and M. Steiner, 1987, “Muster raumlicher and funktionaler Verbindung”, Mimeo, Department. of Economics, University of Graz.Google Scholar
  26. Markusen, A., 1985, Profit Cycles, Oligopoly and Regional Development, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  27. Norton, R. and J. Rees, 1979, “The Product Cycle and the Spatial Decentralisation of American Manufacturing”, Regional Studies, 13, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peneder, M., 1994, Clusteranalyse and sektorale Wettbewerbsfahigkeit der Oster¬reichischen Industrie, Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums fur Offentliche Wirtschaft and Verkehr sowie fur Wissenschaft and Forschung, t.i.p., Wien.Google Scholar
  29. Porter, M, 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  30. Richter, Ch., 1969, “The Impact of Industrial Linkages on Geographic Association”, Journal of Regional Science, 9:19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Staatsministerium Baden-Wurtemberg, Hrsg. 1993, Bericht der Zukunfts-kommission Wirtschaft 2000, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  32. Steiner, M., 1987, “Contrasts in Regional Potentials: Some Aspects of Regional Economic Development”, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 61:79–92.Google Scholar
  33. Steiner, M., Th. Jud, A. Poschl and D. Sturn, 1996, Technologiepolitisches Konzept Steiermark, Leykam, Graz.Google Scholar
  34. Steiner, M., (ed.), 1998, Clusters and Regional Specialisation, European Research in Regional Science, Vol. 8.Google Scholar
  35. Steiner, M. and Ch. Hartmann, 1998, “Learning with Clusters: A Case Study from Upper Styria”, in M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation, European Research in Regional Science, Vol. 8.Google Scholar
  36. Streit, M., 1969, “Spatial Associations and Economic Linkages between Industries”, Journal of Regional Science, 9:177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sturn, D. and M. Steiner, 1995, “Cooperative Strategies of Firms. Chances and Drawbacks for Regional Technology Policy”, in J. Padjen et al. (ed.), Industrial Restructuring and its Impact on Regional Development, Zagreb.Google Scholar
  38. Sturn, D., 1997, Einrichtung von Kompetenzzentren, Erstellung eines Konzeptes zur Auswahl, Einrichtung and Finanzierung von Kompetenzzentren in Osterreich, Joanneum Research, Wien/Graz.Google Scholar
  39. Tichy, G., 1987, “A Sketch of a Probabilistic Modification of the Product Cycle Hypothesis to Explain the Problems of Old Industrial Areas”, in H. Muegge et al., International Economic Restructuring and the Regional Community, Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  40. Tichy, G., 1998, “Clusters: Less Dispensable and More Risky than Ever”, in M. Steiner (ed.), Clusters and Regional Specialisation, European Research in Regional Science, Vol. 8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Steiner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Technology and Regional Policy — InTeReg — Joanneum ResearchGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations