Skip to main content

Arid Rangeland Management Supported by Dynamic Spatially Explicit Simulation Models

  • Conference paper
Sustainable Land Use in Deserts
  • 856 Accesses

Abstract

In arid regions, the effects of grazing management on natural communities of long-lived plants generally take years or even decades to become evident. Event-driven dynamic behaviour, disturbances, unpredictable and low rainfall and complex interactions between species make it difficult to gather sufficient understanding of vegetation dynamics for developing guidelines for sustainable management of arid rangelands. This is further complicated by the importance of spatial scales and patterns, e.g. patchiness of rainfall, heterogeneous grazing behaviour of domestic livestock or distances between artificial watering points.

Simulation models that consider the essential processes determining vegetation dynamics offer scope for quantitatively exploring long-term vegetation dynamics of arid rangelands. If these models are spatially explicit, they additionally allow for the investigation of spatial processes, such as competition or dispersal, and patterns such as landscape features or structures imposed by management (boreholes, paddocks etc.).

This chapter, discusses the promises and limitations of spatially explicit simulation models as (often neglected) tools for rangeland management. We focus on model examples from rangelands in southern Africa, namely a set of models simulating cattle grazing in the southern Kalahari and a model simulating a karakul sheep farm at the border of the Namib desert (Namibia).

Results of the Kalahari models show the existence of a grazing threshold that determines the long-term sustainability of livestock grazing. This threshold depends on rainfall, grazing intensity and grazing heterogeneity. Its effect is illustrated with the spatial vegetation dynamics around artificial watering points. The model of the karakul sheep farm is used to investigate a successful example of sustainable rangeland management under harsh conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew MH (1988) Grazing impact in relation to livestock watering points. Trends Ecol Evol 3: 336–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Archer S, Smeins FE (1991) Ecosystem-level processes. In: Heitschmidt RK, Stuth JW (eds) Grazing management. Timber, Oregon, pp 109–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean WRJ, Macdonald IAW (1994) Historical changes in stocking rates of domestic livestock as a measure of semi-arid and arid rangeland degradation in the Cape Province, South Africa. J Arid Environ 26: 281–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourie JH, van Niekerk JW, Fouché HJ (1985) Weidingskapasiteitsnorme in die Vrystaatstreek. Glen Agric 14: 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedel MH (1991) Range condition assessment and the concepts of thresholds: view point. J Range Manage 44: 422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusco M, Holechek J, Tembo A, Daniel A, Cardenas M (1995) Grazing influences on watering point vegetation in the Chihuahuan desert. J Range Manage 48: 32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellden U (1991) Desertification: time for an assessment? Ambio 20:372–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeltsch F, Milton S, Dean WRJ, van Rooyen N (1996) Tree spacing and coexistence in semi-arid savannas. J Ecol 84: 583–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeltsch F, Milton S, Dean WRJ, van Rooyen N (1997a) Simulated pattern formation around artificial waterholes in the semi-arid Kalahari. J Veg Sci 8: 177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeltsch F, Milton S, Dean WRJ, van Rooyen N (1997b) Analysing shrub encroachment in the southern Kalahari: a grid-based modelling approach. J Appl Ecol 34: 1497–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeltsch F, Milton SJ, Dean WRJ, Moloney K (1998) Modelling the impact of small-scale heterogeneities on tree-grass coexistence in semi-arid savannas. J Ecol 86: 780–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeltsch F, Milton SJ, Moloney K (1999) Detecting process from snap-shot pattern-lessons from tree spacing in the southern Kalahari. OIKOS 85: 451–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger AS, Woehl H (1996) The challenge for Namibia’s future: sustainable land use under arid conditions. Entwicklung Ländlicher Raum 4: 16–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Leistner OA (1967) The plant ecology of the southern Kalahari. Mem Bot Sury South Africa 38: 1–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens HE (1971) The effect of tribal grazing patterns on the habitat in the Kalahari. Botswana Notes Rec 1: 234–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins JS, Thomas DSG (1993) Environmental responses and sensitivity to permanent cattle ranching, semi-arid western central Botswana. In: Thomas DSG, Allison RI (eds) Landscape sensitivity. Wiley, London, pp 273–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickup G (1994) Modelling patterns of defoliation by grazing animals in rangelands. J Appl Ecol 31: 231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieri C, Steiner KG (1996) The role of soil fertility in sustainable agriculture with special reference to Sub—Saharan Africa. Entwicklung Ländlicher Raum 4: 3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Reynolds JF, Cunningham GL, Huenneke LF, Jarrell WM, Virginia RA, Whitford WG (1990) Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247: 1043–1048

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skarpe C (1990) Structure of the woody vegetation in disturbed and undisturbed arid savanna, Botswana. Vegetatio 87: 11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarpe C (1991) Impact of grazing in savanna ecosystems. Ambio 20: 351–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan T, Jeltsch F, Wiegand T, Wissel C, Breiting HA (1998) Sustainable farming at the edge of the Namib: analysis of land use strategies by a computer simulation model. In: Use, JL, Brebbia CA, Power H (eds) Ecosystems and sustainable development. Advances in ecological sciences 1. Computational Mechanics Publication, Southampton, pp 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiéry JM, D’Herbés JM, Valentin C (1995) A model simulating the genesis of banded vegetation patterns in Niger. J Ecol 83: 497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DSG, Shaw PA (1991) The Kalahari environment. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolsma DJ, Ernst WHO, Verwey RA (1987) Nutrients in soil and vegetation around two artificial waterpoints in Eastern Botswana. J Appl Ecol 24: 991–1000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH (1993) Rangeland ecology: understanding and managing change. Ambio 22: 80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter H (1954) Die Grundlagen der Weidewirtschaft in Südwestafrika. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber GE, Jeltsch F (1998) Spatial aspects of grazing in savanna rangelands — a modelling study of vegetation dynamics. In: Usó JL, Brebbia CA, Power H (eds) Ecosystems and sustainable development. Advances in ecological sciences 1. Computational Mechanics Publication, Southampton, pp 427–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber GE, Jeltsch F, van Rooyen N, Milton SJ (1998) Simulated long-term vegetation response to spatial grazing heterogeneity in semi-arid rangelands. J Appl Ecol 35: 687–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Walker BH, Noy-Meir I (1989) Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. J Range Manage 42: 266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand T, Milton SJ, Wissel C (1995) A simulation model for a shrub-ecosystem in the semi-arid Karoo, South Africa. Ecology 76: 2205–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucchini W, Adamson P, McNeill L (1992) A model of Southern African rainfall. South Afr J Sci 88: 103–109

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jeltsch, F., Stephan, T., Wiegand, T., Weber, G.E. (2001). Arid Rangeland Management Supported by Dynamic Spatially Explicit Simulation Models. In: Breckle, SW., Veste, M., Wucherer, W. (eds) Sustainable Land Use in Deserts. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59560-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59560-8_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64027-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59560-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics