Cross-correlated Flow Analysis in Microstructures

  • Michael Brinkmeier
Part of the Springer Series in Chemical Physics book series (CHEMICAL, volume 65)


In most of the FCS applications, diffusion is the physical parameter usedin gaining translational information about the molecules observed. The underlyingreason for this is that a change of the diffusion constant reveals a change of the molecule size, which can be coupled to chemical reactions: therefore opening the important field of chemical kinetics measurements. In all these applications, the measurements are performed in a time-spatially isotropic environment: No information about the structure of the environment and non-diffusional transport processes is needed or being used. But especially for biotechnological applications where complete reaction cascades take place on a small chip streaked with channels and chambers, these reactions and the active transport of the react ants have to be monitored. For this, flow parameters like velocity and its direction are determined via FCS on a micrometer scale. At the same time, other parameters, like diffusion or fluorescent intensity can be measured. The ability to measure flow is greatly enhanced by the so-called “two-beam FCS” where the fluorescent signals generated by two separated foci are being cross-correlated. In the following, the theory of two-beam FCS is outlined, and a typical setup and microchannel measurements are described. Finally, possible applications of the FCS and single molecule detection in microstructures will be given.


Volume Element Focal Spot Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Single Molecule Detection Fluctuation Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 18.1
    E.L. Elson and D. Madge: Biopol. 13, 1–27 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 18.2
    E.L. Elson, D. Madge, and W.W. Webb: Biopol. 13, 29–61 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 18.3
    H. Asai: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 19(11), 2279–2282 (1980)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 18.4
    M. Lapczyna: Thesis, Vakuum-Ultraviolett-(VUV)-Laser-induzierte Mikrostrukturierung von Polymersubstraten für laserspektroskopische Anwendungen in der Bioanalytik, Univ. Kassel, Germany (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 18.5
    J. Holm, H. Elderstig, O. Kristensen, R. Rigler: Nucleosides Nucleotides 16, 557–562 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 18.6
    R. Rigler, et al.: Eur. Biophys. J. 22, 169–175 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 18.7
    M. Brinkmeier: Thesis, Fluoreszenz-Korrelations-Spektroskopie in Mikrostrukturen, Univ. Braunschweig, Germany (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 18.8
    M. Brinkmeier, K. Dorre, K. Riebeseel, R. Rigler: Biophys. Chem. 66, 229– 239 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 18.9
    F. Bernasconi: Investigation of Rates and Mechanism of Reactions Part II, Tech. of Chem. Vol VI, 4th edn. (Wiley, New York)Google Scholar
  10. 18.10
    K. Dorre, S. Brakmann, M. Brinkmeier, et al.: Bio imaging 5, 139–152 (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Brinkmeier

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations