Skip to main content

Subjects on Using Open and Closed-Ended Questions

  • Conference paper
Advances in Classification and Data Analysis
  • 515 Accesses

Abstract

In order to go on with the study of differences between open and closed-ended answers we want to overcome the simple univariate comparison to arrive at the study of relations between open and closed-ended alternatives. The coding procedure of the open answers texts is made by means of the manual post-coding and the textual analysis techniques. Since there is the possibility of observing open and closed-ended information taken from the same respondents, the aim of this work is to understand differences in the frequencies collected with the two data collecting tools and new methods of analysis are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belson W. A., Duncan J. A., (1962), A comparison of the check-list and the open response questioning system, Applied Statistics, 1962, 2, 120–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolasco S. (1995) Criteri di lemmatizzazione per l’individuazione di coordinate semantiche, in Ricerca qualitativa e computer: teorie metodi e applicazioni, Bolasco S. & Cipriani R. (Eds), Franco Angeli, Milano, 87–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolasco S. (1997) L’analisi informatica dei testi, in La ricerca qualitativa, Ricolfi L. ( Eds. ), NIS, 165–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolasco S. (1999) Analisi multidimensionale dei dati, Carocci editore, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn N.M., Sudman S. (1979), Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design, Jossey-Bass Publisher, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld P. L. (1944) The controversy over detailed interviews - an offer for negotiation, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 8, 38–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebart L., Salem A., Berry L. (1998) Exploring textual data, Kluwer-Academic

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman H., Presser F. (1981) Question and Answers in Attitude Surveys, Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman S., Bradburn N. M. (1982) Asking Questions. A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman S., Bradburn N. (1974) Response Effect in Survey, Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tuzzi, A. (2001). Subjects on Using Open and Closed-Ended Questions. In: Borra, S., Rocci, R., Vichi, M., Schader, M. (eds) Advances in Classification and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59471-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59471-7_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41488-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59471-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics