Regulating the 26S Proteasome

  • M. H. Glickman
  • V. Maytal
Part of the Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology book series (CT MICROBIOLOGY, volume 268)


Numerous regulatory pathways are regulated by timely removal of critical proteins. These include proteins involved in the cell cycle, transcriptional regulation, DNA repair, development and differentiation, long-term memory, circadian rhythms, stress response, transcriptional silencing, cell-surface signaling, antigen presentation, and in combating cancer or viral infection (Hershko and Ciechanover 1998; Spataro et al. 1998; Ciechanover et al. 2000). Other proteins that must be degraded properly are damaged, abnormal, or foreign (viral) proteins. Remarkably, in eukaryotes, almost all such proteins are degraded in an ATP-dependent manner by a single, highly conserved, 2.5MDa multisubunit enzyme, the proteasome (Voges et al. 1999; Ferrell et al. 2000; Glickman 2000). The majority of substrates for degradation are first covalently attached to a chain of multiple ubiquitin molecules — a highly conserved 76 amino acid protein — recognized by the proteasome, and hydrolyzed into short peptides (Hershko and Ciechanover 1998; Ciechanover et al. 2000; Kornitzer and Ciechanover 2000; Wilkinson 2000).


Major Histocompatibility Complex Class Core Particle Polyubiquitin Chain Regulatory Particle Multiubiquitin Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams GM, Crotchett B, Slaughter CA, DeMartino GN, Gogol EP (1998) Formation of proteasome PA700 complexes directly correlates with activation of peptidase activity. Biochemistry 37:12927–12932PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams GM, Falke S, Goldberg AL, Slaughter CA, DeMartino GN, Gogol EP (1997) Structural and functional effects of PA700 and modulator protein on proteasomes. J Mol Biol 273:646–657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberts B, Miake-Lye R (1992) Unscrambling the puzzle of biological machines: the importance of details. Cell 68:415–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Amos LA, Cross RA (1997) Structure and dynamics of molecular motors. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7:239–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aravind L, Ponting CP (1998) Homologues of 26S proteasome subunits are regulators of transcription and translation. Prot Sci 7:1250–1254Google Scholar
  6. Armon T, Ganoth D, Hershko A (1990) Assembly of the 26S complex that degrades proteins ligated to ubiquitin is accompanied by the formation of ATPase activity. J Biol Chem 265:20723–20726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Asano K, Kinzy TG, Merrick WC, Hershey JWB (1997) Conservation and diversity of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3. J Biol Chem 272:1101–1109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aviel S, Winberg G, Massucci M, Ciechanover A (2000) Degradation of the Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, targeting via ubiquitination of the N-terminal residue. J Biol Chem 275:23491–23499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Beal R, Deveraux Q, Xia G, Rechsteiner M, Pickart C (1996) Surface hydrophobic residues of multiubiquitin chains essential for proteolytic targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:861–866PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Beal RE, Toscano-Cantaffa D, Young P, Rechsteiner M, Pickart CM (1998) The hydrophobic effect contributes to polyubiquitin chain recognition. Biochemistry 37:2925–2934PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Beninga J, Rock KL, Goldberg AL (1998) Interferon-gamma can stimulate post-proteasomal trimming of the N terminus of an antigenic peptide by inducing leucine aminopeptidase. J Biol Chem 273:18734–18742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bercovich B, Stancovski I, Mayer A, Blumenfeld N, Laszlo A, Schwatz AL, Ciechanover A (1997) Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of certain protein substrates in vitro requires the molecular chaperone Hsc70. J Biol Chem 272:9002–9010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Beyer A (1997) Sequence analysis of the AAA protein family. Prot Sci 6:2043–2058Google Scholar
  14. Bochtler M, Ditzel M, Groll M, Hartmann C, Huber R (1999) The Proteasome. Annu Rev Biophys Bio Mol Struct 28:295–317Google Scholar
  15. Bounpheng MA, Dimas JJ, Dodds SG, Christy BA (1999) Degradation of Id proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. FASEB J 13:2257–2264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bousiotis VA, Freedman GJ, Taylor PA, Berezovskaya A, Grass I, Blazar RB, Nadler LM (2000) p27kipl functions as an anergy factor inhibiting interleukin2 transcription and clonal expansion of alloreactive human and mouse T lymphocytes. Nature Med 6:290–297Google Scholar
  17. Braun BC, Glickman MH, Kraft R, Dahlmann B, Kloetzel PM, Finely D, Schmidt M (1999) The base of the proteasome regulatory particle exhibits chaperone-like activity. Nature Cell Biol 1:221–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Breitschopf K, Bengal E, Ziv T, Admon A, Ciechanover A (1998) A novel site for ubiquitination: the N-terminal residue, and not internal lysines of MyoD, is essential for conjugation and degradation of the protein. EMBO J 17:5964–5973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cagney G, Uetz P, Fields S (2001) Two-hybrid analysis of the Saccharoir yces cerevisiae 26S proteasome. Physiol Genomics 7:27–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chamovitz DA, Wei N, Osterlund MT, von Arnim AG, Staub JM, Deng XW (1996) The COP9 complex, a novel multisubunit nuclear regulator involved in light control of a plant development switch. Cell 86:115–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chauchereau A, Georgiakaki M, Perrin-Wolff M, Milgrom E, Loosfelt H (2000) JAB1 interacts with both the progesterone receptor and SRC-1. J Biol Chem 275:8540–8548PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen P, Hochstrasser M (1996) Autocatalytic subunit processing couples active site formation in the 20S proteasome to completion of assembly. Cell 86:961–972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ciechanover A, Orian A, Schwartz AL (2000) Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis: biological regulation via destruction. Bioessays 22:442–451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Claret FX, Hibi M, Dhut S, Toda T, Karin M (1996) A new group of conserved coactivators that increase the specificity of AP-1 transcription factors. Nature 383:453–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen H, Azriel A, Cohen T, Meraro D, Hashmueli S, Bech-Otschir D, Kraft R, Dubiel W, Levi BZ (2000) Interaction between ICSBP and CSN2 (Tripl5) - a possible link between IRF signaling and the COP9/Signalosome. J Biol Chem (in press)Google Scholar
  26. Dawson S, Hastings R, Takayanagi K, Reynolds S, Low P, Billet M, Mayer RJ (1997) The 26S proteasome: regulation and substrate recognition. Mol Biol Rep 24:39–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dawson SP, Arnold JE, Mayer NJ, Reynolds SE, Billett MA, Gordon C, Colleaux L, Kloetzel PM, Tanaka K, Mayer RJ (1995) Developmental changes of the 26S proteasome in abdominal intersegmental muscles of Manduca sexta during programmed cell death. J Biol Chem 270:1850–1858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. De Mot R, Nagy I, Walz J, Baumeister W (1999) Proteasomes and other self-compartmentalizing proteases in prokaryotes. Trends Microbiol 7:88–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. DeMartino GN, Moomaw CR, Zagnitko OP, Proske RJ, Ma CP, Afendis SJ, Swaffield JC, Slaughter CA (1994) PA700, an ATP-dependent activator of the 20S proteasome, is an ATPase containing multiple members of a nucleotide binding protein family. J Biol Chem 269:20878–20884Google Scholar
  30. DeMartino GN, Proske RJ, Moomaw CR, Strong AA, Song X, Hisamatsu H, Tanaka K, Slaughter CA (1996) Identification, purification, and characterization of a PA700-dependent activator of the proteasome. J Biol Chem 271:3112–3118Google Scholar
  31. Deng XW, Dubiel W, Wei N, Hofmann K, Mundt K, Colicelli J, Kato JY, Naumann M, Segal D, Seeger M, Carr A, Glickman MH, Chamovitz DA (2000) Unified nomenclature for the COP9 signalosome: an essential regulator of development. Trends Genet Sci 16:202–203Google Scholar
  32. Deveraux Q, Jensen C, Rechsteiner M (1995) Molecular cloning and expression of a 26S proteasome subunit enriched in dileucine repeats. J Biol Chem 270:23726–23729PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dick TP, Nussbaum AK, Deeg M, Heinemeyer W, Groll M, Schirle M, Keilholz W, Stefanovic S, Wolf DH, Huber R, Rammenesee HG, Schild H (1998) Contribution of proteasomal beta-subunits to the cleavage of peptide substrates analyzed with yeast mutants. J Biol Chem 273:25637–25646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dubiel W, Ferrell K, Rechsteiner M (1995) Subunits of the regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome. Mol Biol Rep 21:27–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dubiel W, Pratt G, Ferrell K, Rechsteiner M (1992) Purification of an IIS regulator of the multicatalytic protease. J Biol Chem 267:22369–22377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Emmerich NP, Nussbaum AK, Stevanovic S, Priemer M, Toes RE, Rammensee HG, Schild H (2000) The human 26S and 20S proteasomes generate overlapping but different sets of peptide fragments from a model psrotein substrates. J Biol Chem 275:21140–21148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Enenkel C, Lehmann A, Kloetzel PM (1998) Subcellular distribution of proteasomes implicates a major location of protein degradation in the nuclear envelope-ER network in yeast. EMBO J 17:6144 -6154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ferrell K, Wilkinson CR, Dubiel W, Gordon C (2000) Regulatory subunit interactions of the 26S proteasome, a complex problem. Trends Biochem Sci 25:83–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Finley D, Tanaka K, Mann C, Feldmann H, Hochstrasser M, Vierstra R, Johnston S, Hampton R, Haber J, Silver P, Frontali L, Thorsness P, Varshavsky A, Byers B, Wolf D, Jentsch S, Sommer T, Baumeister W, Goldberg A, Fried V, Rubin D, Glickman M, Toh-e A (1998) Unified nomenclature for subunits of the S. cerevisiae proteasome regulatory particle. Trends Biochem Sei 271:244–245Google Scholar
  40. Foss GS, Prydz H (1999) Interferon regulatory factor 1 mediates the interferon-gamma induction of the human immunoproteasome subunit MECL-1. J Biol Chem 274:35196–35202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Freilich S, Oron E, Orgad S, Segal D, Chamovitz DA (1999) The COP9 complex is essential for development of Drosophila melanogcister. Curr Biol 9:1187–1190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Fu H, Sadis S, Rubin DM, Glickman MH, van Nocker S, Finley D, Vierstra RD (1998) Multiubiquitin chain binding and protein degradation are mediated by distinct domains within the 26S proteasome subunit Mcbl. J Biol Chem 273:1970–1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Fujimuro M, Takada H, Saeki Y, Toh-e A, Tanaka K, Yokosawa H (1998a) Growth-dependent change of the 26S proteasome in budding yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 251:818–823PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fujimuro M, Tanaka K, Yokosawa H, Toh-e A (1998b) Sonlp is a component of the 26S proteasome of the yeast Sacharomyces cerevisiae.FEBS Lett 423:149–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Gaczynska M, Rock KL, Goldberg AL (1993) Gamma-interferon and expression of MHC genes regulate peptide hydrolysis by proteasomes. Nature 365:264–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Girod PA, Fu H, Zryd JP, Vierstra RD (1999) Multiubiquitin chain binding subunit MCB1 (RPN10) of the 26S proteasome is essential for developmental progression in Physcomitrella patens. The Plant Cell 11:1457–1471PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Glickman MH (2000) Getting in and out of the proteasome. Semin Cell Dev Biol 11:149–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Glickman MH, Rubin DM, Coux O, Wefes I, Pfeifer G, Cjeka Z, Baumeister W, Fried VA, Finley D (1998a) A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9/Signalosome and eIF3. Cell 94:615–623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Glickman MH, Rubin DM, Fried VA, Finley D (1998b) The regulatory particle of the S. cerevisiae proteasome. Mol Cell Biol 18:3149–3162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Gorbea C, Taillander D, Rechsteiner R (2000) Mapping subunit contacts in the regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome. J Biol Chem 275:875–882PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Gottesman S, Maurizi MR, Wickner S (1997a) Regulatory subunits of energy-dependent proteases. Cell 91(4):435–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Gottesman S, Wickner S, Maurizi MR (1997b) Protein quality control: triage by chaperones and proteases. Genes Dev 11:815–823PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Groll M, Bajorek M, Koehler A, Moroder L, Rubin D, Huber R, Glickman M, Finley D (2000) A gated channel into the core particle of the proteasome. Nature Struct Biol 7:1062–1067PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Groll M, Ditzel L, Loewe J, Stock D, Bochtler M, Bartunik HD, Huber R (1997) Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at a 2.4 Angstrom resolution. Nature 386:463–471PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Haracska L, Udvardy A (1997) Mapping the ubiquitin-binding domains in the p54 regulatory complex subunit of the Drosophila 26S protease. FEBS Lett 412:331–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Hendil KB, Khan S, Tanaka K (1998) Simultaneous binding of PA28 and PA700 activators to 20S proteasomes. Biochem J 332:749–754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hershko A, Ciechanover A (1998) The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem 67:425–479PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Hershko A, Leshinsky E, Ganoth D, Heller H (1984) ATP-dependent degradation of ubiquitin-protein conjugates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:1619–1623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Heusch M, Lin L, Geleziunas R, Greene WC (1999) The generation of nfkb2 p52: mechanism and efficiency. Oncogene 18:6201–6208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Higashitsuji H, Itoh K, Nagao T, Dawson S, Nonoguchi K, Kido T, Mayer RJ, Arii S, Fujita J (2000) Reduced stability of retinoblastoma protein by gankyrin, an oncogenic ankyrin-repeat protein overexpressed in hepatomas. Nature Med 6:96–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Hiyama H, Yokoi M, Masutani C, Sugasawa K, Maekawa T, Tanaka K, Hoeijmaker JH, Hanaoka F (1999) Interaction of hHR23 with s5a. J Biol Chem 274:28019–28025PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Hoelzl H, Kapelari B, Kellermann J, Seemuller E, Sumegi M, Udvardy A, Medalia O, Sperling J, Muller S, Engel A, Baumeister W (2000) The regulatory complex of Drosophila melanogaster 26S proteasomes. Subunit composition and localization of a deubiquitylating enzyme. J Cell Biol 150: 119–130Google Scholar
  63. Hoffman L, Rechsteiner M (1994) Activation of the multicatalytic protease. J Biol Chem 269:16890–16895PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Hofmann K, Bucher P (1998) The PCI domain: a common theme in three multi-protein complexes. Trends Biochem Sci 23:204–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Hofmann RM, Pickart CM (1999) Noncanonical MMS2-encoded ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme functions in assembly of novel polyubiquitin chains for DNA repair. Cell 96:645–653PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Hofmann K, Falquet L (2001) A ubiquitin-interacting motif conserved in components of the proteasomal and lysosomal degradation systems. Trends Biochem Sci 26(6):347–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Holzhutter HG, Froemmel C, Kloetzel PM (1999) A theoretical approach towards the identification of cleavage-determining amino acid motifs of the 20S proteasome. J Mol Biol 286:1251–1265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Hoppe T, Matuschewski K, Rape M, Schlenker S, Ulrich HD, Jentsch S (2000) Activation of a membrane-bound transcription factor by regulated ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent processing. Cell 102:577–586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Hon T, Kato S, Saeki M, DeMartino GN, Slaughter CA, Takeuchi J, Toh-e A, Tanaka K (1998) cDNA cloning and functional analysis of p28 (Nas6p) and p40.5 (Nas7p), two novel regulatory subunits of the 26S proteasome. Gene 216:113–122Google Scholar
  70. Horwich AL, Weber-Ban EU, Finley D (1999) Chaperone rings in protei l folding and degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 96:11033–11040Google Scholar
  71. Hough R, Pratt G, Rechsteiner M (1986) Ubiquitin-lysozyme conjugates. J Biol Chem 261:2400–2408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Kaiser P, Flick K, Wittenberg C, Reed S (2000) Regulation of transcription by ubiquitination without proteolysis: Cdc34/SCF(Met30)-mediated inactivation of the transcription factor Met4. Cell 102: 303–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Kaiser P, Moncollin V, Clarke DJ, Watson MH, Bertolaet BL, Reed SI, Bailly E (1999) Cyclin-dependent kinase and Cks/Sucl interact with the proteasome in yeast to control proteolysis of M-phase targets. Genes Dev 13:1190–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Kapelari B, Bech-Otschir D, Hegerl R, Schade R, Dumdey R, Dubiel W (2000) Electron microscopy and subunit-subunit interaction studies reveal a first architecture of COP9 signalosome. J Mol Biol 300:1169–1178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Karniol B, Yahalom T, Kwok S, Tsuge T, Matsui M, Deng XW, Chamovitz DA (1998) The Arabidopsis homologue of an eIF3 complex subunit associates with the COP9 complex. FEBS Lett 439:173–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Kisselev AF, Akopian TN, Goldberg AL (1998) Range of sizes of peptide products generated during degradation of different proteins by Archaeal proteasomes. J Biol Chem 273:1982–1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Kisselev AF, Akopian TN, Woo KM, Goldberg AL (1999) The size of peptides generated from protein by mammalian 26S and 20S proteasomes. J Biol Chem 274:3363–3371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Kleijnen MF, Shiih AH, Zhou P, Kumar S, Soccio RE, Kedersha NL, Gill G, Howley PM (2000) The hPLIC proteins may provide a link between the Ubiquitination machinery and the proteasome. Mol Cell 6:409–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Knipfer N, Shrader TE (1997) Inactivation of the 20S poteasome in Mycobacterium smegmatis.Mol Microbiol 25:375–383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Kornitzer D, Ciechanover A (2000) Modes of regulation of ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. J Cell Physiol 182:1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Kuttler C, Nussbaum AK, Dick TP, Rammensee HG, Schild H, Hadeler KP (2000) An algorithm for the prediction of proteasomal cleavages. J Mol Biol 298:417–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Kwok SF, Staub JM, Deng XW (1999) Characterisation of two subunits of Arabidopsis 19S proteasome regulatory complex and its possible interaction with the COP9 complex. J Mol Biol 285:85–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Lam YA, DeMartino GN, Pickart CM, Cohen RE (1997a) Specificity of the ubiquitin isopeptidase in the PA700 regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome. J Biol Chem 272:28438–28446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Lam YA, Xu W, DeMartino GN, Cohen RE (1997b) Editing of ubiquitin conjugates by an isopeptidase in the 26S proteasome. Nature 385:737–740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Lambertson D, Chen L, Madura K (1999) Pleiotropic defects caused by loss of the proteasomal-interacting factors Rad23 and RpnlO of S. cerevisiae. Genetics 153:69–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Layfield R, Franklin K, Landon M, Walker G, Wang P, Ramage R, Brown A, Love S, Urquhart K, Muir T, Baker R, Mayer RJ (1999) Chemically synthesized ubiquitin extension proteins detect distinct catalytic capacities of deubiquitinating enzymes. Anal Biochem 274:40–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Lee DH, Sherman MY, Goldberg AL (1996) Involvement of the molecular chaperone Ydjl in the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of short-lived abnormal proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Mol Cell Biol 16:4773–4781PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Li S, Liu X, Ascoli M (2000) p38JAB1 binds to the Intracellular Precursor of the Lutropin/Choriogonadotropin Receptor and promotes Its Degradation. J Biol Chem 275:13386–13393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Li T, Naqvi NI, Yang H, Teo TS (2000) Identification of a 26S proteasome-associated UCH in fission yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 272:270–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Loewe J, Stock D, Jap B, Zwickl P, Baumeister W, Huber R (1995) Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 Angstrom resolution. Science 268:533–539Google Scholar
  91. Lueders J, Demand J, Hoehfeld J (2000) The ubiquitin-related BAG-1 provides a link between the molecular chaperones Hsc70/Hsp70 and the proteasome. J Biol Chem 275:4613–4617Google Scholar
  92. Lupas A, Baumeister W, Hofmann K (1997a) A repetitive sequence in subunits of the 26S proteasome and 20S cyclosome (APC). Trends Biochem Sci 22:195–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Lupas A, Flanagan JM, Tamura T, Baumeister W (1997b) Self compartmentalizing proteases. Trends Biochem Sci 22:399–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Ma CP, Slaughter CA, DeMartino GN (1992) Identification, purification, and characterization of a protein activator (PA28) of the 20S proteasome. J Biol Chem 267:10515–10523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Mamane Y, Heylbroeck C, Genin P, Algarte M, Servant MJ, LePage C, DeLuca C, Kwon H, Lin R, Hiscott J (1999) IRFs: the next generation. Gene 237:1–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Maniatis T (1999) A ubiquitin ligase complex essential for the NF-KB, Wnt/Wingless, and Hedgehog signaling pathways. Genes and Dev 13:505–514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Mannhaupt G, Schnall R, Karpov V, Vetter I, Feldmann H (1999) Rpn4 acts as a transcription factor by binding to PACE, a nonamer box found upstream of 26S protease mal and other genes in yeast. FEBS Lett 450:27–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Maupin-Furlow JA, Wilson HL, Kaczowka SJ, Ou MS (2000) Proteasomes in the archaea: from structure to function. Front Biosci 5:D837-D865PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Michalek MT, Grant EP, Gramm C, Goldberg AL, Rock KL (1993) A role for the ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway in MHC class 1 restricted antigen presentation. Nature 363:552–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Mundt KE, Porte J, Murray JM, Brikos C, Christensen PU, Caspari T, Hagan IM, Millar JB, Simanis V, Hofmann K, Carr AM (1999) The COP9/signalosome complex is conserved in fission yeast and has a role in S phase. Curr Biol 9:1427–1430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Murakami Y, Matsufuji S, Hayashi SI, Tanahashi N, Tanaka K (2000) Degradation of ODC by the 26S proteasome. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 267:1–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Nakagawa K, Yokasawa H (2000) Degradation of transcription factor IRF-1 by the ubiquitn-proteasome pathway. The C-terminal region governs protein stability. Eur J Biochem 267:1680–1686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Naumann M, Bech-Otschir D, Huang X, Ferrell K, Dubiel W (1999) COP9 signalosome-directed c-Jun activation/stabilization is independent of JNK. J Biol Chem 274:35297–35300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Nussbaum AK, Dick TP, Keilholz W, Schirle M, Stevanovic S, Dietz K, Heinemeyer W, Groll M, Wolf DH, Huber R, Rammensee HG, Schild H (1998) Cleavage motifs of the yeast 20S proteasome beta-subunits deduced from digests of enolase 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:12504–12509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Ohba M (1997) Modulation of intracellular protein degradation by SSB1-SIS1 chaperon system in yeast S. cerevisiae.FEBS Lett 409:307–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Orian A, Schwartz AL, Israel A, Whiteside S, Kahana C, Ciechanover A (1999) Structural motifs involved in ubiquitin-mediated processing of the NF-κB precursor pi05: roles of the glycine-rich region and a downstream ubiquitination domain. Mol Cell Biol 19:3664–3673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Osmulski PA, Gaczyncka M (1998) A new large proteolytic complex distinct from the proteasome is present in the cytosol of fission yeast. Curr Biol 8:1023–1026PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Palombella VJ, Rando OJ, Goldberg AL, Maniatis T (1994) The ubiquitin proteasome pathway is required for processing the NF-KB 1 precursor protein and activation of NF-KB. Cell 78:773–785PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Papa FR, Amerik AY, Hochstrasser M (1999) Interaction of the Doa4 deubiquitinating enzyme with the yeast 26S proteasome. Mol Biol Cell 10:741–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Papa FR, Hochstrasser M (1993) The yeast DOA4 gene encodes a deubiquitinating enzyme related to a product of the tre-2 oncogene. Nature 366:313–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Patel S, Latterich M (1998) The AAA team: related ATPases with diverse functions. Trends Cell Biol 8:65–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Peters JM, Franke WW, Kleinschmidt J A (1994) Distinct 19S and 20S subcomplexes of the proteasome and their distribution in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. J Biol Chem 269:7709–7718PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Pickart C (1997) Targeting of substrates to the 26S proteasome. FASEB J 11:1055–1066PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Piotrowski J, Beal R, Hoffman L, Wilkinson KD, Cohen RE, Pickart C (1997) Inhibition of the 26S proteasome by polyubiquitin chains synthesized to have defined lengths. J Biol Chem 272:23712–23721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Ramos PC, Hockendorff J, Johnson ES, Varshavsky A, Dohmen RJ (1998) Umplp is required for proper maturation of the 20S proteasome and becomes its substrate upon completion of the assembly. Cell 92:489–499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Realini C, Jensen CC, Zhang Z, Johnsto SC, Knowlton JR, Hill CP, Rechsteiner M (1997) Characterization of recombinant REGα, REGβ and REGγ proteasome activators. J Biol Chem 272:25483–25492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Rechsteiner M, Hoffman L, Dubiel W (1993) The multicatalytic and 26S proteases. J Biol Chem 268:6065–6068PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Rechsteiner M, Realini C, Ustrell V (2000) The proteasome activator 11S REG (PA28) and class I antigen presentation. Biochem J 345:1–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Rohrwild M, Pfeifer G, Santarius U, Mueller SA, Hauang HC, Engel A, Baumeister W, Goldberg AL (1997) The ATP-dependent HslV/U protease from Escherichia coli is a four-ring structure resembling the proteasome. Nature Struct Biol 4:133–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Rubin DM, Glickman MH, Larsen CN, Dhruvakumar S, Finley D (1998) Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome. EMBO J 17:4909–4919PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Ruepp A, Eckerskorn C, Bogyo M, Baumeister W (1998) Proteasome function is dispensable under normal but not under heat shock conditions in Thermoplasma acidophilum. FEBS Lett 425:87–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Russell SJ, Reed SH, Huang W, Friedberg EC, Johnston SJ (1999) The 19S regulatory complex of the proteasome functions independently of proteolysis in nucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell 3:687–695PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Russell SJ, Steger KA, Johnston SA (1999) Subcellular localization stochiometry and protein levels of 26S proteasome subunits in yeast. J Biol Chem 274:21943–21952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Saeki Y, Toh-e A, Yokosawa H (2000) Rapid isolation and characterization of the yeast proteasome regulatory complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 273:509–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Schauber C, Chen L, Tongaonakar P, Vega I, Lambertson D, Potts W, Madura K (1998) Rad23 links DNA repair to the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Nature 391:715–718PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Schmidtke G, Emch S, Groettrup M, Holzhutter HG (2000) Evidence for the existence of a non-catalytic modifier site of peptide hydrolysis by the 20S proteasome. J Biol Chem 275:22056–22063PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Sears C, Olesen J, Rubin DM, Finley D, Maniatis T (1998) NF-κB pl05 processing via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J Biol Chem 273:1409–1419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Seeger M, Ferrell K, Frank R, Dubiel W (1997) HIV-1 Tat inhibits the 20S proteasome and its US regulator-mediated activation. J Biol Chem 272:8145–8148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Seeger M, Kraft R, Ferrel K, Bech-Otschir D, Dumdey R, Schade R, Gordon C, Naumann M, Dubiel W (1998) A novel protein complex involved in signal transduction possessing similarities to the 26S proteasome subunits. FASEB J 12:469–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Serino G, Tsuge T, Kwok SF, Matsui M, Wei N, Deng XW (1999) Arabidopsis cop8 and fus4 mutations define the same locus that encodes subunit 4 of the COP9 signalosome. Plant Cell 11:1967–1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Silva CL, Portaro FC, Bonato VL, deCamargo AC, Ferro ES (1999) Thimet oligopeptidase (EC, a novel protein on the route of MHC class I antigen presentation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 255:591–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Spataro V, Norbury C, Harris AL (1998) The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in cancer. Br J Cancer 77:448–455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Spence J, Gali RR, Dittmar G, Sherman F, Karin M, Finley D (2000) Cell cycle-regulated modification of the ribosome by a variant multiubiquitin chain. Cell 102:67–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Spence J, Sadis S, Haas AL, Finley D (1995) A ubiquitin mutant with specific defects in DNA repair and multiubiquitination. Mol Cell Biol 15:1265–1273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Stenoien DL, Cummings CJ, Adams HP, Manicini MG, Patel K, DeMartino GN, Marcelli M, Weigel NL, Mancini MA (1999) Polyglutamine-expanded androgen receptors form aggregates that sequester heat shock proteins, proteasome components and SRC-1, and are suppressed by the HDJ-2 chaperone. Hum Mol Genet 8:731–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Stohwasser R, Salzmann U, Ruppert T, Kloetzel PM, Holzhuetter HG (2000) Kinetic evidences for facilitation of peptide channeling by the proteasomal activator PA28. Eur J Biochem 267:6221–6230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Stoltze L, Nussbaum AK, Sijts A, Emmerich NP, Kloetzel PM, Schild H (2000) The function of the proteasome system in MHC class I antigen processing. Immunol Today 21:317–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Strous GJ, Govers R (1999) The ubiquitin-proteasome system and endocytosis. J Cell Sci 112:1417–1423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Swaminathan S, Amerik AY, Hochstrasser M (1999) The Doa4 deubiquitinating enzyme is required for ubiquitin homeostasis in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 10:2583–2594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Szpikowska BK, Swiderek KM, Sherman MA, Mas MT (1998) MgATP binding to the nucleotide-binding domains of the eukaryotic cytoplasmic chaperonin induces conformational changes in the putative substrate binding domains. Prot Sci 7:1524–1530Google Scholar
  141. Tamura N, Lottspeich F, Baumeister W, Tamura T (1998) The role of tricorn protease and its aminopeptidase-interacting factors in cellular protein degradation. Cell 95:637–648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Tanahashi N, Murakami Y, Minami Y, Shimbara N, Hendil KB, Tanaka K (2000) Hybrid proteasomes: induction by interferon-gamma and contribution to ATP-dependent proteolysis. J Biol Chem 275:14336–14345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Thrower JS, Hoffman L, Rechsteiner M, Pickart C (2000) Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J 19:94–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Tomoda K, Kubota Y, Kato J (1999) Degradation of the cyclin dependent kinaseinhibitor p27/Kipl is instigated by Jabl. Nature 398:160–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Tone Y, Tanahashi N, Tanaka K, Fujimoro M, Yokosawa H, Toh-e A (2000) Nobl, a new essential protein associates with the 26S proteasome of growing S. cerevisiae cells. Gene 243:37–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Tongaonkar P, Chen L, Lambertson D, Ko B, Madura K (2000) Evidence for an interaction between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and the 26S proteasome. Mol Cell Biol 2000:4691–4698Google Scholar
  147. Treier M, Staszewski LM, Bohmann D (1994) Ubiquitin-dependent c-Jun degradation in vivo is mediated by the delta domain. Cell 78:787–798PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. van Nocker S, Sadis S, Rubin DM, Glickman MH, Fu H, Coux O, Wefes I, Finley D, Vierstra RD (1996) The multiubiquitin chain binding protein Mcbl is a component of the 26S proteasome in S. cerevisiae and plays a nonessential, substrate-specific role in protein turnover. Mol Cell Biol 11:6020–6028Google Scholar
  149. Voges D, Zwickl P, Baumeister W (1999) The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu Rev Biochem 68:1015–1068PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Wang EW, Kessler BM, Borodovsky A, Cravatt BF, Bogyo M, Plotgh HL, Glas R (2000) Integration of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway with a cytosolic oligopeptidase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9990–9995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Wang G, Wang B, Jiang J (1999) Protein kinase A antagonises Hedge hog signaling by regulating both the activator and repressor forms of Cubitus interruptus. Genes Dev 13:2828–1960PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Watanabe TK, Saito A, Suzuki M, Fujiwara T, Takahashi E, Slaughter CA, DeMartino GN, Hendil KB, Chung CH, Tanahashi N, Tanaka K (1998) cDNA cloning and characterization of a human proteasomal modulator subunit p27. Genomics 50:241–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Weber-Ban EU, Reid BG, Miranker AD, Horwich AL (1999) Global unfolding of a substrate protein by the HsplOO chaperone ClpA. Nature 401:90–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Wei N, Tsuge T, Serino G, Dohmae N, Takio K, Matsui M, Deng XW (1998) The COP9 complex is conserved between plants and mammals and is related to the 26S proteasome regulatory complex. Curr Biol 8:919–922PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Wigley WC, Fabunmi RP, Lee MG, Marino CR, Muallem S, DeMartino GN, Thomas PJ (1999) Dynamic association of proteasomal machinery with the centrosome. J Cell Biol 145:481–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Wilkinson CRM, Ferrell K, Penny M, Wallace M, Dubiel W, Gordon C (2000) Analysis of a gene encoding RpnlO of the fission yeast proteasome reveals that the polyubiquitin-binding site of this subunit is essential when Rpnl2/Mts3 activity is compromised. J Biol Chem 275:15182–15192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Wilkinson CR, Seeger M, Hartmann-Petersen R, Stone M, Wallace M, Semple C, Gordon C (2001) Proteins containing the UBA domain are able to bind to multi-ubiquitin chains. Nature Cell Biol 3:939–943PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Wilkinson KD (2000) Ubiquitination and deubiquitination: Targeting of proteins for degradation by the proteasome. Semin Cell Dev Biol 11:141–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Wilson HL, Ou MS, Aldrich HC, Maupin-Furlow J (2000) Biochemical and physical properties of the M. jannaschii 20S proteasome and PAN, a homolog of the ATPase (Rpt) subunits of the eucaryal 26S proteasome. J Bacteriol 186:1680–1692Google Scholar
  160. Wolf S, Nagy I, Lupas A, Pfeifer G, Cejka Z, Mueller SA, Engel A, De Mot R, Baumeister W (1998) Characterization of ARC, a divergent member of the AAA ATPase family from Rhodococcus erythropolis. J Mol Biol 277:13–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Xie Y, Varshavsky A (2000) Physical association of ubiquitin ligases and the 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:2497–2502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Yao T, Cohen RE (1999) Giant proteases: beyond the proteasome. Curr Biol 9:R551-R553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Yao Y, Huang L, Krutchinsky A, Wong ML, Standing KG, Burlingame AL, Wang CC (1999) Structural and functional characterizations of the proteasome-activating protein PA26 from Trypanosoma brucei.J Biol Chem 274:33921–33930PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Young P, Deveraux Q, Beal RE, Pickart CM, Rechsteiner M (1998) Characterization of two polyubiquitin binding sites in the 26S protease subunit 5a. J Biol Chem 273:5461–5467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Zwickl P, Baumeister W, Steven A (2000) Dis-assembly lines: the proteasome and related ATPase-assisted proteases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10:242–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Zwickl P, Ng D, Woo KM, Klenk HP, Goldberg AL (1999) An archaebacterial ATPase, homologous to ATPases in the eukaryotic 26S proteasome, activates protein breakdown by 20S proteasomes. J Biol Chem 274:26008–26014PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. H. Glickman
    • 1
  • V. Maytal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyThe Technion, Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Institute for Catalysis (ICST)The Technion, Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations